Evaluation of milking performance following 2 different teat-preparation routines

IF 4.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Dairy Science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.3168/jds.2024-25927
H.J. Williams, D.H. Grove-White, R. Ridgway, N.J. Connolly, R. Puentes-Garrido, C. Watson
{"title":"Evaluation of milking performance following 2 different teat-preparation routines","authors":"H.J. Williams,&nbsp;D.H. Grove-White,&nbsp;R. Ridgway,&nbsp;N.J. Connolly,&nbsp;R. Puentes-Garrido,&nbsp;C. Watson","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-25927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of an iodine-based predip solution and paper towel (dip routine) reduces the incidence of delayed milk ejection and the recorded vacuum at the teat end, compared with a proprietary teat wipe (wipe routine), when forestripping is not part of the teat-preparation routine. Eight experimental milkings, 4 for each teat-preparation routine, were observed on a Holstein dairy herd milking 195 cows 3 times daily through a herringbone parlor. Allocation of routine at the first session was by coin toss, thereafter teat-preparation routine was alternated for each observed session. Parameters extracted from electronic on-farm milk meters included milk yield (kg), milking unit on time (MUOT; s), average milk flow rate (kg/min), maximum milk flow rate (kg/min), milk yield in the first 2 min (kg), percentage of total milk yield in the first 2 min (%), and occurrence of bimodal milking. Vacuum at the teat level was recorded using digital vacuum recorders and analyzed to determine the average mouthpiece chamber vacuum in front and back quarters during the main milking period. Cow characteristics including parity, DIM, calving date, and 305-d mature-equivalent milk production were obtained from dairy management software. Investigators used timestamps to calculate the duration the operator spent wiping teats and the lag time, which was defined as first application of the wipe or paper towel to cluster attachment. Data from 1,287 milkings (194 cows) were analyzed for milk flow outcomes, and data from 96 milkings (76 cows) were analyzed for vacuum outcomes. Multivariable mixed-effects models demonstrated that the odds of a bimodal milking pattern were higher when the wipe routine was used compared with the dip routine (odds ratio: 1.6). The dip routine was associated with 3.37% more milk produced in the first 2 min, 4.38 s less MUOT, and 2.69 kPa lower average vacuum in the back mouthpiece during main milking, with no significant difference in the front mouthpiece vacuum between the 2 preparation routines. These results indicate that dipping followed by wiping as part of the teat-preparation routine was associated with improved milk ejection and flow compared with using a disinfectant wipe alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":"108 4","pages":"Pages 3796-3804"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030225001535","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of an iodine-based predip solution and paper towel (dip routine) reduces the incidence of delayed milk ejection and the recorded vacuum at the teat end, compared with a proprietary teat wipe (wipe routine), when forestripping is not part of the teat-preparation routine. Eight experimental milkings, 4 for each teat-preparation routine, were observed on a Holstein dairy herd milking 195 cows 3 times daily through a herringbone parlor. Allocation of routine at the first session was by coin toss, thereafter teat-preparation routine was alternated for each observed session. Parameters extracted from electronic on-farm milk meters included milk yield (kg), milking unit on time (MUOT; s), average milk flow rate (kg/min), maximum milk flow rate (kg/min), milk yield in the first 2 min (kg), percentage of total milk yield in the first 2 min (%), and occurrence of bimodal milking. Vacuum at the teat level was recorded using digital vacuum recorders and analyzed to determine the average mouthpiece chamber vacuum in front and back quarters during the main milking period. Cow characteristics including parity, DIM, calving date, and 305-d mature-equivalent milk production were obtained from dairy management software. Investigators used timestamps to calculate the duration the operator spent wiping teats and the lag time, which was defined as first application of the wipe or paper towel to cluster attachment. Data from 1,287 milkings (194 cows) were analyzed for milk flow outcomes, and data from 96 milkings (76 cows) were analyzed for vacuum outcomes. Multivariable mixed-effects models demonstrated that the odds of a bimodal milking pattern were higher when the wipe routine was used compared with the dip routine (odds ratio: 1.6). The dip routine was associated with 3.37% more milk produced in the first 2 min, 4.38 s less MUOT, and 2.69 kPa lower average vacuum in the back mouthpiece during main milking, with no significant difference in the front mouthpiece vacuum between the 2 preparation routines. These results indicate that dipping followed by wiping as part of the teat-preparation routine was associated with improved milk ejection and flow compared with using a disinfectant wipe alone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种不同的备乳程序对挤奶性能的评价。
本研究的目的是调查是否使用基于碘的预浸溶液和纸巾(DP常规)减少延迟泌乳的发生率和记录的真空在乳头末端,与专有的乳头擦拭(WP常规)相比,当预萃不是乳头准备常规的一部分。对荷斯坦奶牛群进行了8次实验挤奶,每组4次,每天3次,通过人字室为195头奶牛挤奶。在第一次会议上,例行程序的分配是通过抛硬币的方式进行的,此后,在每个观察会议上轮流进行准备程序。电子农场奶量仪提取的参数包括产奶量(kg)、按时挤奶单位(MUOT);s)、平均产奶量(kg/min)、最大产奶量(kg/min)、前2min产奶量(kg)、前2min产奶量占总产奶量的百分比(%)、双峰挤奶(BIM)的发生情况。利用数字真空记录仪记录奶头水平的真空度,并对其进行分析,确定主挤奶期间前后口室的平均真空度。奶牛特征包括胎次、DIM、产犊日期和305 d成熟当量产奶量。研究人员使用时间戳来计算操作员擦拭乳头的时间和滞后时间,滞后时间被定义为第一次使用擦拭器或纸巾进行群集附着。分析了1,287次挤奶(194头奶牛)的奶流结果,分析了96次挤奶(76头奶牛)的真空结果。多变量混合效果模型表明,当使用擦拭程序时,BIM模式的几率高于使用浸浸程序(比值比:1.6)。浸乳方式使前2 min产奶量增加3.37%,MUOT减少4.38 s,主挤奶时后吸口平均真空度降低2.69 kPa,前吸口真空度在两种准备方式之间无显著差异。这些结果表明,与单独使用消毒液擦拭相比,作为准备乳汁常规的一部分,浸泡后擦拭与改善乳汁喷射和流量有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning to understand relationships between farm practices and milk fatty acids across diverse European dairy farms. Decoding early-lactation energy balance in dairy cows using blood co-expression networks and candidate markers. Effects of Temperature Treatments on Protein Structural Modifications and Aggregation Behavior in Fermented Milks Heated after Culturing. Viable but Non-Culturable State in Staphylococcus aureus: A Potential Implication for Food Safety in the Context of Bovine Mastitis. Novel supplemental guidelines for Zn, Cu, and Mn, in bovines, by integrating net requirements, native dietary occurrence, and the boundaries of homeostatic regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1