Factors that influence anemia prevalence: a comparative study of datasets from Russia and South Africa.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-22363-6
Maria A Burilina, Natisha Dukhi, Aleksandra L Mashkova, Ivan V Nevolin, Ronel Sewpaul
{"title":"Factors that influence anemia prevalence: a comparative study of datasets from Russia and South Africa.","authors":"Maria A Burilina, Natisha Dukhi, Aleksandra L Mashkova, Ivan V Nevolin, Ronel Sewpaul","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-22363-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of anemia is heterogeneous: different countries and population groups face varying risks of the disease. By identifying social, demographic, and economic factors, policymakers can define risk groups based on lifestyle and tailor measures to address the disease. This study examines and compares socioeconomic factors associated with anemia using data from two national surveys. The Russian survey relied solely on questionnaires, while the South African survey included medical examinations to confirm anemia cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multinomial regression was employed to estimate the risks of anemia using a combination of socioeconomic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An inverse relationship was observed between bad habits and the risk of anemia in both samples. Education, income, and regular food consumption were found to be insignificant variables in both samples. However, household property ownership emerged as a significant factor. In South Africa, an inverse relationship with anemia risk was identified for households owning electric/gas ovens (OR = 0.769, 95% CI: 0.613-0.967, p ≤ 0.05) and washing machine (OR = 0.699, 95% CI: 0.564-0.866, p ≤ 0.01. Increased efforts for housekeeping also manifest themselves as increased risk to be anemic if an individual grows vegetables and fruits (OR = 1.333, 95% CI: 1.063-1.671, p ≤ 0.05). In Russia, factors associated with a higher socioeconomic status-such as owning a computer (OR = 0.754, 95% CI: 0.629-0.905, p ≤ 0.01), car (OR = 0.757, 95% CI: 0.610-0.938, p ≤ 0.05), or DVD player (OR = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.684-0.981, p ≤ 0.05) - were linked to a lower risk of anemia. Additionally, the habit of seeking medical help rather than self-medicating was negatively associated with anemia in the Russian sample (OR = 0.774, 95% CI: 0.704-0.850, p ≤ 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The comparison of socio-economic factors influencing the prevalence of anemia between Russian and South African samples has validated self-assessments as a reliable proxy for health status in the context of Russia. This methodological advancement underpins current and future research based on the extensive database of the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey, encompassing approximately 2,500 indicators, to investigate disease prevalence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22363-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of anemia is heterogeneous: different countries and population groups face varying risks of the disease. By identifying social, demographic, and economic factors, policymakers can define risk groups based on lifestyle and tailor measures to address the disease. This study examines and compares socioeconomic factors associated with anemia using data from two national surveys. The Russian survey relied solely on questionnaires, while the South African survey included medical examinations to confirm anemia cases.

Methods: Multinomial regression was employed to estimate the risks of anemia using a combination of socioeconomic factors.

Results: An inverse relationship was observed between bad habits and the risk of anemia in both samples. Education, income, and regular food consumption were found to be insignificant variables in both samples. However, household property ownership emerged as a significant factor. In South Africa, an inverse relationship with anemia risk was identified for households owning electric/gas ovens (OR = 0.769, 95% CI: 0.613-0.967, p ≤ 0.05) and washing machine (OR = 0.699, 95% CI: 0.564-0.866, p ≤ 0.01. Increased efforts for housekeeping also manifest themselves as increased risk to be anemic if an individual grows vegetables and fruits (OR = 1.333, 95% CI: 1.063-1.671, p ≤ 0.05). In Russia, factors associated with a higher socioeconomic status-such as owning a computer (OR = 0.754, 95% CI: 0.629-0.905, p ≤ 0.01), car (OR = 0.757, 95% CI: 0.610-0.938, p ≤ 0.05), or DVD player (OR = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.684-0.981, p ≤ 0.05) - were linked to a lower risk of anemia. Additionally, the habit of seeking medical help rather than self-medicating was negatively associated with anemia in the Russian sample (OR = 0.774, 95% CI: 0.704-0.850, p ≤ 0.01).

Conclusions: The comparison of socio-economic factors influencing the prevalence of anemia between Russian and South African samples has validated self-assessments as a reliable proxy for health status in the context of Russia. This methodological advancement underpins current and future research based on the extensive database of the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey, encompassing approximately 2,500 indicators, to investigate disease prevalence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响贫血患病率的因素:来自俄罗斯和南非的数据集的比较研究。
背景:贫血的患病率是异质性的:不同的国家和人群面临不同的疾病风险。通过确定社会、人口和经济因素,决策者可以根据生活方式确定风险群体,并制定措施来应对疾病。本研究利用两项全国性调查的数据,对与贫血相关的社会经济因素进行了检验和比较。俄罗斯的调查仅依靠问卷调查,而南非的调查包括医学检查,以确认贫血病例。方法:综合社会经济因素,采用多项回归估计贫血风险。结果:在两个样本中,不良习惯与贫血风险呈反比关系。在这两个样本中,教育、收入和常规食物消费都是不显著的变量。然而,家庭财产所有权成为一个重要因素。在南非,发现拥有电炉/煤气炉(OR = 0.769, 95% CI: 0.613-0.967, p≤0.05)和洗衣机(OR = 0.699, 95% CI: 0.564-0.866, p≤0.01)的家庭与贫血风险呈负相关。如果一个人种植蔬菜和水果,增加家务劳动也会增加患贫血的风险(OR = 1.333, 95% CI: 1.063-1.671, p≤0.05)。在俄罗斯,与较高社会经济地位相关的因素——如拥有一台电脑(OR = 0.754, 95% CI: 0.629-0.905, p≤0.01)、汽车(OR = 0.757, 95% CI: 0.610-0.938, p≤0.05)或DVD播放机(OR = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.684-0.981, p≤0.05)——与较低的贫血风险相关。此外,寻求医疗帮助而非自我用药的习惯与俄罗斯样本中的贫血呈负相关(OR = 0.774, 95% CI: 0.704-0.850, p≤0.01)。结论:俄罗斯和南非样本之间影响贫血患病率的社会经济因素的比较验证了自我评估在俄罗斯背景下作为健康状况的可靠代理。这一方法上的进步为目前和今后的研究提供了基础,该研究基于俄罗斯纵向监测调查的广泛数据库,其中包括大约2 500个指标,以调查疾病流行情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
COCCOS: a blueprint transition program for young people with chronic conditions using experience-based co-design. Spatial distribution and multilevel determinants of unvaccinated children in Somaliland: analysis of the 2020 Somaliland Health and Demographic Survey (SLHDS). Drivers of food cost in outer regional, remote, and very remote Australia: a systematic scoping review. Whole genome sequencing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in public health responses: a review of current practice and enablers in select low-incidence jurisdictions. Real-world cost evaluation of conbercept vs. ranibizumab for retinal and choroidal vascular diseases from 2021 to 2024: evidence from societal and medical insurance perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1