Performance indicators on long-term care for older people in 43 high- and middle-income countries: literature review, web search and expert consultation.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12573-4
Mircha Poldrugovac, Joost D Wammes, Véronique L L C Bos, Erica Barbazza, Damir Ivanković, Hanneke Merten, Janet L MacNeil Vroomen, Niek S Klazinga, Dionne S Kringos
{"title":"Performance indicators on long-term care for older people in 43 high- and middle-income countries: literature review, web search and expert consultation.","authors":"Mircha Poldrugovac, Joost D Wammes, Véronique L L C Bos, Erica Barbazza, Damir Ivanković, Hanneke Merten, Janet L MacNeil Vroomen, Niek S Klazinga, Dionne S Kringos","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12573-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term care (LTC) for older people is an area of focus for many health and social policies in high- and middle-income countries. Performance Indicators are used to provide national and subnational jurisdictions with insights to ensure quality of the provided LTC services for older people. Although LTC systems vary across jurisdictions, there is demand for internationally comparable indicators to support countries in monitoring LTC and facilitate mutual learning. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of indicators currently employed to monitor the performance of LTC systems and services in high- and middle- income countries and describe their key characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of the literature in six scientific databases (literature review) and web searches of relevant sites across 43 selected countries (web search) was conducted. We asked country representatives from the Working Party on Health Care Quality and Outcomes of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, where most of these countries are represented, to cross-validate the sources of information found (expert consultation). We then extracted and analysed the data from all obtained sources based on a predetermined set of characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search of scientific databases yielded 12,960 records, from which forty papers were selected for inclusion. The scientific literature findings were complemented by 34 grey literature sources. In total, we identified performance indicators being used to monitor LTC systems and services across 29 national and subnational jurisdictions in 24 out of 43 countries. In total, 620 indicators were identified. All jurisdictions used indicators related to institutional LTC and 16 also used indicators on home care. The most frequently monitored structures, processes, and results were pressure ulcers, falls, use of restraints and pain management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified LTC performance indicators currently being monitored in 29 jurisdictions across 24 countries. Many jurisdictions are monitoring similar structures, processes, and results. This presents an opportunity to develop internationally comparable LTC performance indicators based on existing efforts across countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"460"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12573-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-term care (LTC) for older people is an area of focus for many health and social policies in high- and middle-income countries. Performance Indicators are used to provide national and subnational jurisdictions with insights to ensure quality of the provided LTC services for older people. Although LTC systems vary across jurisdictions, there is demand for internationally comparable indicators to support countries in monitoring LTC and facilitate mutual learning. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of indicators currently employed to monitor the performance of LTC systems and services in high- and middle- income countries and describe their key characteristics.

Methods: A review of the literature in six scientific databases (literature review) and web searches of relevant sites across 43 selected countries (web search) was conducted. We asked country representatives from the Working Party on Health Care Quality and Outcomes of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, where most of these countries are represented, to cross-validate the sources of information found (expert consultation). We then extracted and analysed the data from all obtained sources based on a predetermined set of characteristics.

Results: The search of scientific databases yielded 12,960 records, from which forty papers were selected for inclusion. The scientific literature findings were complemented by 34 grey literature sources. In total, we identified performance indicators being used to monitor LTC systems and services across 29 national and subnational jurisdictions in 24 out of 43 countries. In total, 620 indicators were identified. All jurisdictions used indicators related to institutional LTC and 16 also used indicators on home care. The most frequently monitored structures, processes, and results were pressure ulcers, falls, use of restraints and pain management.

Conclusions: We identified LTC performance indicators currently being monitored in 29 jurisdictions across 24 countries. Many jurisdictions are monitoring similar structures, processes, and results. This presents an opportunity to develop internationally comparable LTC performance indicators based on existing efforts across countries.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
43个高收入和中等收入国家老年人长期护理绩效指标:文献综述、网络搜索和专家咨询。
背景:老年人长期护理是高收入和中等收入国家许多卫生和社会政策的重点领域。绩效指标用于向国家和地方辖区提供见解,以确保为老年人提供的长期服务的质量。尽管不同司法管辖区的长期支付系统各不相同,但需要有国际上可比较的指标,以支持各国监测长期支付并促进相互学习。本研究的目的是概述目前用于监测高收入和中等收入国家长期服务系统和服务绩效的指标,并描述其关键特征。方法:对6个科学数据库中的文献进行综述(literature review),并对43个选定国家的相关网站进行网络检索(web search)。我们请经济合作与发展组织卫生保健质量和成果工作组的国家代表交叉验证所发现的信息来源(专家咨询),大多数这些国家都在该工作组有代表。然后,我们根据一组预定的特征从所有获得的来源提取和分析数据。结果:检索科学数据库获得12960条记录,从中选择40篇论文纳入。科学文献发现补充了34个灰色文献来源。总体而言,我们确定了用于监测43个国家中24个国家的29个国家和次国家管辖区的长期医疗服务体系和服务的绩效指标。总共确定了620个指标。所有司法管辖区都使用了与机构LTC相关的指标,16个司法管辖区还使用了家庭护理指标。最常监测的结构、过程和结果是压疮、跌倒、约束物的使用和疼痛管理。结论:我们确定了目前在24个国家的29个司法管辖区监测的LTC绩效指标。许多司法管辖区正在监督类似的结构、过程和结果。这为在各国现有努力的基础上制定具有国际可比性的长期投资绩效指标提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Challenges of community health nursing practice in the Primary Health Care network of Iran: a qualitative study. Demographic differences in annual wellness visit completion after expanded medicare telehealth coverage. Intra-action review of West African health Organization's response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Economic Community of West African states (ECOWAS) region, 2020 - 2022. Perception and practice of primary health care professionals regarding chronic pain: a qualitative study. Exploring patients' perceptions of their vaccine conversations with care providers: a staged approach to developing a patient evaluation survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1