Can the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio Always Predict Mortality in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy? A Single-Center Experience.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.3390/brainsci15030323
Şennur Delibaş Katı, Firdevs Ezgi Uçan Tokuç
{"title":"Can the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio Always Predict Mortality in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy? A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Şennur Delibaş Katı, Firdevs Ezgi Uçan Tokuç","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15030323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Predicting mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke who need endovascular treatment (EVT) has previously been shown to be related to inflammation. In this study, we aimed to examine the effects of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and hypersensitive C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) values on mortality and hemorrhagic transformation. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 225 adult patients who underwent EVT between 2022 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The presence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after the procedure; good and poor clinical outcomes according to modified Rankin Scores; mortality status; and NLR, PLR, and CAR values were collected. <b>Results</b>: The average age of the patients was 66.95 ± 12.74 years, and 133 (59.1%) patients were male. Thirty-eight (30.4%) patients had symptomatic ICH. While 164 (72.9%) patients had a poor outcome, 80 (35.6%) patients died. There was a correlation between the NLR and PLR values and symptomatic ICH (<i>p</i> = 0.013, 0.009, respectively) in the univariate analysis, but this relationship was not found in the multivariate analyses (<i>p</i>: 0.212 and <i>p</i>: 0.459). No statistically significant relationship was observed between the CAR and symptomatic ICH and mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.784, 0.079, respectively). When the laboratory data were compared according to the mortality status, the NLR and PLR were observed to be statistically significantly higher in the patients with mortality (<i>p</i> < 0.001, 0.005, respectively) in univariate analyses. But, as a result, the NLR, PLR, and CAR were not associated with ICH and mortality according to the multivariable logistic regression analysis. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings highlight the need to better understand the post-stroke immune response. Our study demonstrated that the NLR, PLR, and CAR were not associated with ICH and mortality according to the multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Predicting mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke who need endovascular treatment (EVT) has previously been shown to be related to inflammation. In this study, we aimed to examine the effects of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and hypersensitive C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) values on mortality and hemorrhagic transformation. Methods: A total of 225 adult patients who underwent EVT between 2022 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The presence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after the procedure; good and poor clinical outcomes according to modified Rankin Scores; mortality status; and NLR, PLR, and CAR values were collected. Results: The average age of the patients was 66.95 ± 12.74 years, and 133 (59.1%) patients were male. Thirty-eight (30.4%) patients had symptomatic ICH. While 164 (72.9%) patients had a poor outcome, 80 (35.6%) patients died. There was a correlation between the NLR and PLR values and symptomatic ICH (p = 0.013, 0.009, respectively) in the univariate analysis, but this relationship was not found in the multivariate analyses (p: 0.212 and p: 0.459). No statistically significant relationship was observed between the CAR and symptomatic ICH and mortality (p = 0.784, 0.079, respectively). When the laboratory data were compared according to the mortality status, the NLR and PLR were observed to be statistically significantly higher in the patients with mortality (p < 0.001, 0.005, respectively) in univariate analyses. But, as a result, the NLR, PLR, and CAR were not associated with ICH and mortality according to the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the need to better understand the post-stroke immune response. Our study demonstrated that the NLR, PLR, and CAR were not associated with ICH and mortality according to the multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值和c反应蛋白与白蛋白比值是否总能预测机械取栓术急性缺血性卒中患者的死亡率?单中心体验。
背景:预测需要血管内治疗(EVT)的急性缺血性卒中患者的死亡率之前已被证明与炎症有关。在这项研究中,我们旨在研究中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和超敏c反应蛋白与白蛋白比值(CAR)值对死亡率和出血转化的影响。方法:回顾性分析2022 - 2024年间接受EVT治疗的225例成人患者。术后出现颅内出血(ICH);根据改良Rankin评分进行临床预后的好坏;死亡状态;采集NLR、PLR、CAR值。结果:患者平均年龄66.95±12.74岁,男性133例(59.1%)。38例(30.4%)患者有症状性脑出血。164例(72.9%)患者预后不良,80例(35.6%)患者死亡。单因素分析中NLR和PLR值与症状性脑出血有相关性(p分别为0.013、0.009),多因素分析中无相关性(p分别为0.212和0.459)。CAR与症状性脑出血及死亡率无统计学意义(p分别为0.784、0.079)。根据病死率对比实验室数据,单因素分析发现病死率患者NLR、PLR显著高于病死率患者(p分别< 0.001、0.005)。但是,根据多变量logistic回归分析,NLR、PLR和CAR与ICH和死亡率没有相关性。结论:我们的发现强调了更好地了解脑卒中后免疫反应的必要性。我们的研究表明,根据多变量logistic回归分析,NLR、PLR和CAR与ICH和死亡率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Toe Clearance Characteristics Between Simulated Obstacle Crossing Using Visual Height Cues and Actual Obstacle Crossing. Sense of Time in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: ADHD and Developmental Dyscalculia from a Dimensional and Transdiagnostic Perspective. Temporal Dynamics of Auditory Evoked Neural Oscillations Under a Paired-Pulse Suppression Paradigm. Neural Complexity of Implicit Attitudes Predicts Exercise Behavior in Hypertensive Patients: An EEG Entropy Study. Exploring the Role of TSPO-PET Imaging Among MRI-Negative Patients with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: From the Perspective of Heterogeneity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1