Evaluation of Hologic LOCalizer™ RFID Tags for Preoperative Localization of Breast Lesions: A Single-Center Experience.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15060746
Charlotte Munday, Anmol Malhotra, Sawsan Taif, Adeola Omotade, Arathi Menon, Kefah Mokbel
{"title":"Evaluation of Hologic LOCalizer™ RFID Tags for Preoperative Localization of Breast Lesions: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Charlotte Munday, Anmol Malhotra, Sawsan Taif, Adeola Omotade, Arathi Menon, Kefah Mokbel","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15060746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The increasing detection of non-palpable breast lesions necessitates accurate preoperative localization to ensure complete excision while preserving healthy tissue and optimizing cosmetic outcomes. Traditional wire-guided localization (WL) has been the gold standard; however, it has several drawbacks, including patient discomfort and scheduling challenges. This study evaluates the accuracy and feasibility of radiofrequency identification (RFID) tag localization using the Hologic LOCalizer™ system as an alternative technique. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included 258 consecutive patients who underwent image-guided RFID tag localization from March 2021 to February 2023 from a single-center London breast unit. The primary outcome measured was the accuracy of RFID tag placement, defined as within 10 mm of the target lesion on post-clip mammograms. Secondary outcomes included type and size of lesions, re-excision rates, review of post-operative specimen radiographs, and patient demographics. <b>Results</b>: A total of 297 RFID tags were placed, with 95.6% accurately positioned within the target range. The median target size was 29 mm, with the most common abnormalities being mass lesions (64%). Among the 13 inaccurately placed RFID tags (4.4%), all were identified preoperatively, with two requiring additional wire placements. RFID tags were successfully identified in 92% of specimen radiographs, and 8% of patients required re-excision due to positive or close margins. Notably, patients with multiple RFID tags showed a higher incidence of re-excision. <b>Conclusions</b>: The LOCalizer™ RFID system demonstrated a high accuracy rate for preoperative localization of breast lesions, presenting a viable alternative to WL. This technique improves surgical scheduling flexibility and enhances patient comfort. Comparative studies with other wire-free localization technologies, such as magnetic seeds and radar reflectors, are needed to determine the optimal approach for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060746","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing detection of non-palpable breast lesions necessitates accurate preoperative localization to ensure complete excision while preserving healthy tissue and optimizing cosmetic outcomes. Traditional wire-guided localization (WL) has been the gold standard; however, it has several drawbacks, including patient discomfort and scheduling challenges. This study evaluates the accuracy and feasibility of radiofrequency identification (RFID) tag localization using the Hologic LOCalizer™ system as an alternative technique. Methods: This retrospective study included 258 consecutive patients who underwent image-guided RFID tag localization from March 2021 to February 2023 from a single-center London breast unit. The primary outcome measured was the accuracy of RFID tag placement, defined as within 10 mm of the target lesion on post-clip mammograms. Secondary outcomes included type and size of lesions, re-excision rates, review of post-operative specimen radiographs, and patient demographics. Results: A total of 297 RFID tags were placed, with 95.6% accurately positioned within the target range. The median target size was 29 mm, with the most common abnormalities being mass lesions (64%). Among the 13 inaccurately placed RFID tags (4.4%), all were identified preoperatively, with two requiring additional wire placements. RFID tags were successfully identified in 92% of specimen radiographs, and 8% of patients required re-excision due to positive or close margins. Notably, patients with multiple RFID tags showed a higher incidence of re-excision. Conclusions: The LOCalizer™ RFID system demonstrated a high accuracy rate for preoperative localization of breast lesions, presenting a viable alternative to WL. This technique improves surgical scheduling flexibility and enhances patient comfort. Comparative studies with other wire-free localization technologies, such as magnetic seeds and radar reflectors, are needed to determine the optimal approach for clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hologic LOCalizer™ RFID 标签用于乳腺病灶术前定位的评估:单中心经验。
背景:越来越多的发现不可触及的乳房病变需要准确的术前定位,以确保完全切除,同时保留健康组织和优化美容效果。传统的线导定位(WL)一直是黄金标准;然而,它也有一些缺点,包括患者不适和日程安排方面的挑战。本研究评估了使用Hologic LOCalizer™系统作为替代技术的射频识别(RFID)标签定位的准确性和可行性。方法:这项回顾性研究包括258名连续患者,这些患者于2021年3月至2023年2月在伦敦一家单中心乳房单位接受了图像引导的RFID标签定位。测量的主要结果是RFID标签放置的准确性,定义为在夹片后乳房x光片上目标病变的10毫米范围内。次要结果包括病变的类型和大小、再切除率、术后标本x线片检查和患者人口统计学。结果:共放置297个RFID标签,95.6%的标签准确定位在目标范围内。中位靶大小为29mm,最常见的异常是肿块病变(64%)。在13个放置不准确的RFID标签(4.4%)中,所有的标签都在术前被识别出来,其中两个需要额外的电线放置。射频识别标签在92%的标本x线片中被成功识别,8%的患者由于边缘阳性或闭合而需要再次切除。值得注意的是,带有多个RFID标签的患者再次切除的发生率更高。结论:LOCalizer™RFID系统在乳房病变术前定位方面具有较高的准确率,是WL的可行替代方案。这项技术提高了手术安排的灵活性,提高了患者的舒适度。需要与其他无线定位技术(如磁种子和雷达反射器)进行比较研究,以确定临床实践的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Model Performance and Clinical Usefulness in Automated Rectal Segmentation in CT for Prostate and Cervical Cancer. MMDD: A Multimodal Multitask Dynamic Disentanglement Framework for Robust Major Depressive Disorder Diagnosis Across Neuroimaging Sites. Depth-Resolved OCT of Root Canal Walls After Diode-Laser Irradiation: A Descriptive Ex Vivo Study Following a Stereomicroscopy Report. Heart Morphometry in Standard Second Trimester Scan. Liver Tissue Mapping in Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia: Reproducibility and Clinical Insights from Multiparametric MRI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1