Ethnic and Socio-Economic Variations in Comorbidity and Mortality in Cancer Survivors: A UK Population-Based Observational Study.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancers Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.3390/cancers17060983
Tahania Ahmad, Abu Z M Dayem Ullah, Claude Chelala, Stephanie J C Taylor
{"title":"Ethnic and Socio-Economic Variations in Comorbidity and Mortality in Cancer Survivors: A UK Population-Based Observational Study.","authors":"Tahania Ahmad, Abu Z M Dayem Ullah, Claude Chelala, Stephanie J C Taylor","doi":"10.3390/cancers17060983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The population of cancer survivors is increasing rapidly in the UK. Little is known about the variation in comorbidity and mortality by ethnicity and socio-economic condition in this population. This study explores these variations using primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and linked secondary care data. The prevalence of multimorbidity and risk of mortality were calculated for Asian, Black, and Other ethnic and socio-economic groups in England, consisting of 333,226 cancer survivors across 28 cancer types. Odds ratios and hazard ratios were calculated using the White and most affluent groups as references and adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and smoking status. Stratified mortality analysis was conducted for survivors of the six common cancers in the UK: breast, prostate, colorectal, bladder, cervical, and lung. Compared to White cancer survivors, survivors of all other ethnic groups had a statistically significant higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes (Asian adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.61 (4.02-5.28), Black OR 1.87 (1.52-2.30), and Other OR 2.06 (1.64-2.59)). However, they had lower prevalences of depression and anxiety. Asian survivors exhibited the highest overall prevalence of comorbidity. Black survivors had the worst survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.48 (1.38-1.59)) for all cancers combined, as well as for breast, prostate, colorectal, and cervical cancers. Black breast cancer survivors face a particularly high mortality risk (HR 1.78 (1.52-2.10)) compared to Whites. Asian survivors had higher mortality for all cancers combined (HR 1.31 (1.23-1.39)) and specifically for lung cancer (HR 1.81 (1.44-2.28)). The Other ethnic group had a significantly increased risk of mortality in cervical cancer (HR 1.90 (1.19-3.03)). The risk of mortality increased with worse socio-economic conditions, regardless of ethnic group. Cancer survivors of non-White ethnicity and poorer socio-economic background in the UK have worse outcomes in terms of increased prevalence of multimorbidity and mortality compared to White survivors. These findings indicate the need to comprehend the underlying reasons for these disparities and to assess the implications for cancer services, patient experience, and overall outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17060983","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The population of cancer survivors is increasing rapidly in the UK. Little is known about the variation in comorbidity and mortality by ethnicity and socio-economic condition in this population. This study explores these variations using primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and linked secondary care data. The prevalence of multimorbidity and risk of mortality were calculated for Asian, Black, and Other ethnic and socio-economic groups in England, consisting of 333,226 cancer survivors across 28 cancer types. Odds ratios and hazard ratios were calculated using the White and most affluent groups as references and adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and smoking status. Stratified mortality analysis was conducted for survivors of the six common cancers in the UK: breast, prostate, colorectal, bladder, cervical, and lung. Compared to White cancer survivors, survivors of all other ethnic groups had a statistically significant higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes (Asian adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.61 (4.02-5.28), Black OR 1.87 (1.52-2.30), and Other OR 2.06 (1.64-2.59)). However, they had lower prevalences of depression and anxiety. Asian survivors exhibited the highest overall prevalence of comorbidity. Black survivors had the worst survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.48 (1.38-1.59)) for all cancers combined, as well as for breast, prostate, colorectal, and cervical cancers. Black breast cancer survivors face a particularly high mortality risk (HR 1.78 (1.52-2.10)) compared to Whites. Asian survivors had higher mortality for all cancers combined (HR 1.31 (1.23-1.39)) and specifically for lung cancer (HR 1.81 (1.44-2.28)). The Other ethnic group had a significantly increased risk of mortality in cervical cancer (HR 1.90 (1.19-3.03)). The risk of mortality increased with worse socio-economic conditions, regardless of ethnic group. Cancer survivors of non-White ethnicity and poorer socio-economic background in the UK have worse outcomes in terms of increased prevalence of multimorbidity and mortality compared to White survivors. These findings indicate the need to comprehend the underlying reasons for these disparities and to assess the implications for cancer services, patient experience, and overall outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症幸存者共病和死亡率的种族和社会经济差异:一项基于英国人群的观察性研究。
在英国,癌症幸存者的人数正在迅速增加。人们对这一人群中不同种族和社会经济条件的合并症和死亡率差异知之甚少。本研究利用临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD)中的初级医疗数据和相关的二级医疗数据对这些差异进行了探讨。研究计算了英格兰亚裔、黑人和其他种族及社会经济群体的多病患病率和死亡风险,这些群体包括 28 种癌症类型的 333,226 名癌症幸存者。以白人和最富裕群体为参照,并根据年龄、性别、体重指数和吸烟状况进行调整后,计算出了患病率和危险比。对英国六种常见癌症(乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结肠直肠癌、膀胱癌、宫颈癌和肺癌)的幸存者进行了分层死亡率分析。与白人癌症幸存者相比,所有其他种族群体的幸存者的 2 型糖尿病患病率在统计意义上明显更高(亚裔调整后的几率比 (OR) 为 4.61 (4.02-5.28),黑人 OR 为 1.87 (1.52-2.30),其他种族 OR 为 2.06 (1.64-2.59))。不过,他们的抑郁和焦虑患病率较低。亚裔幸存者的总体合并症发生率最高。就所有癌症以及乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结肠直肠癌和宫颈癌而言,黑人幸存者的生存率最差(调整后危险比 (HR) 1.48 (1.38-1.59))。与白人相比,黑人乳腺癌幸存者面临的死亡风险尤其高(HR 1.78 (1.52-2.10))。亚裔幸存者在所有癌症中的死亡率较高(HR 1.31 (1.23-1.39)),尤其是肺癌(HR 1.81 (1.44-2.28))。其他族裔群体患宫颈癌的死亡风险明显增加(HR 1.90 (1.19-3.03))。社会经济条件越差,死亡风险越高,与种族无关。在英国,与白人幸存者相比,非白种人和社会经济背景较差的癌症幸存者在多病症发生率和死亡率方面的结果更差。这些发现表明,有必要了解造成这些差异的根本原因,并评估其对癌症服务、患者体验和总体治疗效果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of pPCL Diagnosed Using the IMWG 2021 Consensus Definition: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis. Predictors of Survival in Patients Aged ≥70 with Glioblastoma: A Time-Dependent Multivariable Analysis. Effects of Tobacco Use on Oral Cancer Screening Algorithm Performance. Differences in Executive Functioning Between Patients with IDH1-Mutant Oligodendroglioma and Astrocytoma Before and After Surgery. Complications of Port-a-Cath Systems: An Institutional Study on Romanian Oncological Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1