Bronchoscopic Intervention Reduces Dyspnea in Severely Symptomatic Patients With Central Malignant Airway Obstruction

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of pain and symptom management Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.03.022
Malin Svensson MD, PhD , Andreas Palm MD, PhD , Nilla Westöö BSN , Magnus Lindskog MD, PhD
{"title":"Bronchoscopic Intervention Reduces Dyspnea in Severely Symptomatic Patients With Central Malignant Airway Obstruction","authors":"Malin Svensson MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andreas Palm MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nilla Westöö BSN ,&nbsp;Magnus Lindskog MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.03.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Malignant central airway obstruction (MCAO) is a serious and often life-threatening condition.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to investigate the effects of endoscopic interventions on dyspnea, Quality of life (qoL), and physiological measurements in patients with MCAO.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a single-center prospective cohort study. All patients referred to Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, for bronchoscopic interventions due to MCAO between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively by heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), oxygen saturation. The NRS dyspnea scale, the Cancer Dyspnea Scale (CDS), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and QLQ-lung cancer-13 (EORTC-QLQ LC13), and ECOG-WHO Performance Status (ECOG-PS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study group comprised 44 patients (56% women, 69.3 ± 6.8 years). No procedure-related deaths occurred. The first postoperative day the following measurements had decreased: RR (19.9 ± 4.9 vs. 17.1 ± 3.9, <em>P</em> = 0.0027), CDS score (13.6 ± 1.43 vs. 5.8 ± 4.9, <em>P</em> = 0.0003), NRS dyspnea score (5.6 ± 2.2 vs. 2.3 ± 2.4, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The FEV1 increased from 1.23 ± 0.45 to 1.51 ± 0.57, (<em>P</em> = 0.0014). At 1 month follow up the CDS score had decreased further to 5.2 ± 4.1, (<em>P</em> = 0.0001), the QLQ-C30 dyspnea score from 76.5 ± 25.7 to 41.2 ± 27.7, (<em>P</em> = 0.001) and the QLQ-LC13 dyspnea score from 62.5 ± 6.4 to 32.3 ± 5.5, (<em>P</em> = 0.003). The QLQ-C30 Global Health Scale (GHS) score increased from 33.9 ± 4.9 to 47.0 ± 18.7, (<em>P</em> = 0.0124). Significant changes were only seen in patients with preoperative ECOG PS ≥2.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Most patients with MCAO benefit from bronchoscopic intervention and those with worse ECOG PS may benefit even more in terms of symptom relief.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"70 1","pages":"Pages 38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392425005573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Malignant central airway obstruction (MCAO) is a serious and often life-threatening condition.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the effects of endoscopic interventions on dyspnea, Quality of life (qoL), and physiological measurements in patients with MCAO.

Methods

This was a single-center prospective cohort study. All patients referred to Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, for bronchoscopic interventions due to MCAO between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively by heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), oxygen saturation. The NRS dyspnea scale, the Cancer Dyspnea Scale (CDS), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and QLQ-lung cancer-13 (EORTC-QLQ LC13), and ECOG-WHO Performance Status (ECOG-PS).

Results

The study group comprised 44 patients (56% women, 69.3 ± 6.8 years). No procedure-related deaths occurred. The first postoperative day the following measurements had decreased: RR (19.9 ± 4.9 vs. 17.1 ± 3.9, P = 0.0027), CDS score (13.6 ± 1.43 vs. 5.8 ± 4.9, P = 0.0003), NRS dyspnea score (5.6 ± 2.2 vs. 2.3 ± 2.4, P < 0.001). The FEV1 increased from 1.23 ± 0.45 to 1.51 ± 0.57, (P = 0.0014). At 1 month follow up the CDS score had decreased further to 5.2 ± 4.1, (P = 0.0001), the QLQ-C30 dyspnea score from 76.5 ± 25.7 to 41.2 ± 27.7, (P = 0.001) and the QLQ-LC13 dyspnea score from 62.5 ± 6.4 to 32.3 ± 5.5, (P = 0.003). The QLQ-C30 Global Health Scale (GHS) score increased from 33.9 ± 4.9 to 47.0 ± 18.7, (P = 0.0124). Significant changes were only seen in patients with preoperative ECOG PS ≥2.

Conclusion

Most patients with MCAO benefit from bronchoscopic intervention and those with worse ECOG PS may benefit even more in terms of symptom relief.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支气管镜介入治疗可减轻有严重症状的中枢性恶性气道阻塞患者的呼吸困难。
目的:我们旨在探讨内镜干预对恶性中央气道阻塞(MCAO)患者呼吸困难、生活质量(QoL)和生理指标的影响。方法:这是一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间因MCAO转诊至瑞典乌普萨拉大学医院接受支气管镜干预的所有患者均符合纳入条件。术前、术后分别以心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、血氧饱和度进行评价。NRS呼吸困难量表、癌症呼吸困难量表(CDS)、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)和qlq -肺癌问卷13 (EORTC- qlq LC13),以及ECOG-WHO表现状态(ECOG-PS)。结果:研究组纳入44例患者(女性56%,年龄69.3±6.8岁)。未发生与手术相关的死亡。术后第一天以下指标降低:RR(19.9±4.9 vs 17.1±3.9,p=0.0027), CDS评分(13.6±1.43 vs 5.8±4.9,p=0.0003), NRS呼吸困难评分(5.6±2.2 vs 2.3±2.4,p)结论:大多数MCAO患者受益于支气管镜干预,ECOG PS较差的患者可能在症状缓解方面获益更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
期刊最新文献
Temporary Steroid Magic Pain and Fatigue Interrelations in Terminally Ill Inpatients: A PCOC-Based Analysis Palliative Care in Low and Middle-Income Countries to Reduce Cancer Suffering: A Systematic Review Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Breathlessness in Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Interdisciplinary US Hospice Clinician Presence Throughout the Medical Aid in Dying Procedure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1