Development and Initial Validation of the Autism and Neurodiversity Attitudes Scale.

Autism in adulthood : challenges and management Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1089/aut.2023.0090
Rachel A VanDaalen, Frank R Dillon, Carlos E Santos, Cristalis Capielo Rosario
{"title":"Development and Initial Validation of the Autism and Neurodiversity Attitudes Scale.","authors":"Rachel A VanDaalen, Frank R Dillon, Carlos E Santos, Cristalis Capielo Rosario","doi":"10.1089/aut.2023.0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drawn from aspects of the autistic self-advocacy movement, the neurodiversity movement is a conceptual framework and sociopolitical movement that views neurological differences and disabilities (e.g., autism) as natural human variations that can form a central component of one's identity. This study presents the development and validation of a scale to assess endorsement of neurodiversity beliefs with respect to autism among both autistic and nonautistic adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diverse samples of adults were utilized to conduct exploratory (<i>N</i> = 249) and confirmatory (<i>N</i> = 259) factor analyses, resulting in a 17-item second-order three-factor model that demonstrated adequate evidence of reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three factors consisted of <i>Autism Anti-Stigma</i>, <i>Autism Permanence</i>, and <i>Autism as Difference</i>. Additional analyses of measurement validity revealed that endorsement of the neurodiversity framework is positively correlated with sociopolitical engagement, and that endorsement of the neurodiversity framework is negatively correlated with negative attitudes toward people with disabilities. Self-identified autistic adults endorsed the neurodiversity framework to a greater extent than nonautistic adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validity results are congruent with the historical roots of the neurodiversity movement and the attitudes endorsed by many autistic adults. Given the factor structure and reliability results, researchers can use this scale to assess neurodiversity-affirming attitudes as a unitary construct or can use the anti-stigma subscale to assess stigma-related attitudes toward autism. This scale has utility for researchers that seek to understand and promote well-being in autistic adults, as well as research related to potential support systems in the lives of autistic adults. It can also be used to increase self-understanding among autistic individuals and allies, as this scale can be used for both autistic and nonautistic adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":72338,"journal":{"name":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","volume":"7 1","pages":"39-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2023.0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drawn from aspects of the autistic self-advocacy movement, the neurodiversity movement is a conceptual framework and sociopolitical movement that views neurological differences and disabilities (e.g., autism) as natural human variations that can form a central component of one's identity. This study presents the development and validation of a scale to assess endorsement of neurodiversity beliefs with respect to autism among both autistic and nonautistic adults.

Methods: Diverse samples of adults were utilized to conduct exploratory (N = 249) and confirmatory (N = 259) factor analyses, resulting in a 17-item second-order three-factor model that demonstrated adequate evidence of reliability and validity.

Results: The three factors consisted of Autism Anti-Stigma, Autism Permanence, and Autism as Difference. Additional analyses of measurement validity revealed that endorsement of the neurodiversity framework is positively correlated with sociopolitical engagement, and that endorsement of the neurodiversity framework is negatively correlated with negative attitudes toward people with disabilities. Self-identified autistic adults endorsed the neurodiversity framework to a greater extent than nonautistic adults.

Conclusion: The validity results are congruent with the historical roots of the neurodiversity movement and the attitudes endorsed by many autistic adults. Given the factor structure and reliability results, researchers can use this scale to assess neurodiversity-affirming attitudes as a unitary construct or can use the anti-stigma subscale to assess stigma-related attitudes toward autism. This scale has utility for researchers that seek to understand and promote well-being in autistic adults, as well as research related to potential support systems in the lives of autistic adults. It can also be used to increase self-understanding among autistic individuals and allies, as this scale can be used for both autistic and nonautistic adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症与神经多样性态度量表的开发与初步验证。
背景:神经多样性运动是一个概念框架和社会政治运动,它将神经差异和残疾(如自闭症)视为自然的人类变异,可以形成一个人身份的核心组成部分。本研究提出了一个量表的开发和验证,以评估自闭症和非自闭症成年人对自闭症神经多样性信念的认可。方法:利用不同成人样本进行探索性因子分析(N = 249)和验证性因子分析(N = 259),得到17项二阶三因子模型,具有足够的信度和效度证据。结果:自闭症抗污名化、自闭症持久性和自闭症差异性三个因素。对测量效度的进一步分析表明,神经多样性框架的认可与社会政治参与呈正相关,而神经多样性框架的认可与对残疾人的消极态度呈负相关。自认为患有自闭症的成年人比非自闭症的成年人在更大程度上支持神经多样性框架。结论:效度结果与神经多样性运动的历史根源和许多自闭症成年人所认可的态度是一致的。考虑到因子结构和信度结果,研究人员可以使用该量表作为一个统一的结构来评估神经多样性肯定态度,也可以使用反污名子量表来评估对自闭症的污名相关态度。该量表对研究人员了解和促进自闭症成年人的福祉,以及研究自闭症成年人生活中潜在的支持系统有实用价值。它也可以用来增加自闭症个体和盟友之间的自我理解,因为这个量表可以用于自闭症和非自闭症的成年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancing Research on Suicide and Mental Health in Autistic Adults Through a Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)-Inspired Framework. A Coproduced Exploration of Factors Influential to Quality of Life from the Perspective of Autistic Adults. "I've Absolutely Reached Rock Bottom and Have No Energy": The Lived Experience of Unemployed and Underemployed Autistic Adults. Facial Affect Differences in Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults Across Contexts and Their Relationship to First-Impression Formation. "Listening with Your Heart": Autism Support Program Faculty Experiences in Teaching Autistic College Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1