Electronic positive patient identification, computer provider order entry, and electronic remote blood issue implemented in operating rooms improve the safety and efficiency of blood transfusions.

IF 1 Laboratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1093/labmed/lmae122
Nathan A Williams, Magali J Fontaine, Erika Reese, Megan Anders, Peter Rock, Parvez M Lokhandwala, Ashanpreet S Grewal
{"title":"Electronic positive patient identification, computer provider order entry, and electronic remote blood issue implemented in operating rooms improve the safety and efficiency of blood transfusions.","authors":"Nathan A Williams, Magali J Fontaine, Erika Reese, Megan Anders, Peter Rock, Parvez M Lokhandwala, Ashanpreet S Grewal","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Blood transfusions are routinely performed in operation rooms. The process chain of performing ABO type, antibody screen, crossmatch, blood transport, and patient verification is complex. A multidisciplinary task force convened to improve the process of blood ordering and utilization identified 3 issues: (1) blood orders performed on paper included transcription errors; (2) guidelines for blood ordering practices were lacking, with inappropriate and arbitrary requests; and (3) there were long intervals between ordering and receiving blood in the operating room because of its distance from the blood bank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The task force implemented (1) an electronic positive patient identification (ePPID) system, (2) a standardized computer provider order entry (CPOE) for ordering blood for surgical patients, and (3) an electronic remote blood issuing (ERBI) system using refrigerators located within the operating suite.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following ePPID implementation, transfusion documentation compliance rates improved from 71% to 98% and detected 2 patient safety issues. Implementation of CPOE with a maximum surgical blood order schedule and ERBI led to a substantial decline in blood product dispensed from coolers and reduced returns of unused red blood cells (from 30% to 15%) and plasma units (from 45% to 30%) to the blood bank over 2 years.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Electronic PPID, CPOE, and ERBI improved patient safety, workflow, and efficiency during blood transfusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"484-489"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Blood transfusions are routinely performed in operation rooms. The process chain of performing ABO type, antibody screen, crossmatch, blood transport, and patient verification is complex. A multidisciplinary task force convened to improve the process of blood ordering and utilization identified 3 issues: (1) blood orders performed on paper included transcription errors; (2) guidelines for blood ordering practices were lacking, with inappropriate and arbitrary requests; and (3) there were long intervals between ordering and receiving blood in the operating room because of its distance from the blood bank.

Methods: The task force implemented (1) an electronic positive patient identification (ePPID) system, (2) a standardized computer provider order entry (CPOE) for ordering blood for surgical patients, and (3) an electronic remote blood issuing (ERBI) system using refrigerators located within the operating suite.

Results: Following ePPID implementation, transfusion documentation compliance rates improved from 71% to 98% and detected 2 patient safety issues. Implementation of CPOE with a maximum surgical blood order schedule and ERBI led to a substantial decline in blood product dispensed from coolers and reduced returns of unused red blood cells (from 30% to 15%) and plasma units (from 45% to 30%) to the blood bank over 2 years.

Discussion: Electronic PPID, CPOE, and ERBI improved patient safety, workflow, and efficiency during blood transfusions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在手术室实施病人电子身份确认、计算机医嘱输入和电子远程血液发放,可提高输血的安全性和效率。
简介:输血是手术室的常规操作。执行ABO型,抗体筛选,交叉配型,血液运输和患者验证的过程链是复杂的。为改进血液订购和使用流程而召集的多学科工作组确定了3个问题:(1)书面血液订购包括转录错误;(2)采血规范缺乏,采血要求不恰当、随意;(3)手术室离血库较远,取血间隔较长。方法:工作组实施了(1)电子阳性患者识别(ePPID)系统,(2)用于外科患者订血的标准化计算机提供者订单输入(CPOE)系统,以及(3)使用位于手术室内的冰箱的电子远程供血(ERBI)系统。结果:实施ePPID后,输血文件的依从率从71%提高到98%,并发现了2个患者安全问题。CPOE与最大外科血单时间表和ERBI的实施导致冷却器分配的血液制品大幅下降,并减少了2年内未使用的红细胞(从30%降至15%)和血浆单位(从45%降至30%)的血库回报。讨论:电子PPID、CPOE和ERBI改善了患者输血过程中的安全性、工作流程和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ASCP Board of Certification Survey of Medical Laboratory Science education 2023: faculty. Complete phenotyping of the pathogenic genotype of the NTRK1 gene in early childhood. Correction to: Evaluation of CD73, PD-1, circHIPK3, and circNRIP1 expression in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer. Correlation analysis of serum TIP30 mRNA expression with recompensation and short-term prognosis in the patients with hepatitis B virus-derived decompensated liver cirrhosis. Vitamin D receptor gene variations and their association with cardiometabolic risk and microvascular complications in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: evidence from a Turkish cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1