Envisaging better care for patients with complex multimorbidity in Aotearoa New Zealand.

IF 0.9 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of primary health care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1071/HC24082
Anna Askerud
{"title":"Envisaging better care for patients with complex multimorbidity in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Anna Askerud","doi":"10.1071/HC24082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Client-Led Integrated Care (CLIC) was implemented in general practices between 2018 and 2022 in the Southern region of New Zealand. It was envisaged to be an equitable, holistic and patient-centred inter-disciplinary framework of care for those with multiple long-term conditions; usually called multimorbidity. Aim This process evaluation aimed to determine whether CLIC supported self-management ability and assessed its alignment with current priorities for multimorbidity management. Method Mixed methods were used across four purposively selected general practices. At each practice interviews were undertaken together with participant observation over 3years. This was followed by analysis of annual self-report surveys. Results CLIC worked well for those patients who were engaged, but the implementation provided minimal consideration of the resources required for everyone to receive culturally competent integrated care. Staff reported structural difficulties and wondered if the right patients were targeted. Discussion CLIC did not address the needs of all participants, nor did it target those with the most ability to benefit. In all practices, despite increasing rates of multimorbidity and social complexity during a pandemic, the organisation of general practice and how it connected with the health system remained unchanged. Transitioning to a general practice system for complex multimorbidity will require changes in funding, strong leadership and clear communication. It requires all areas of the health system to provide an integrated health and social care system that is culturally competent and engages those most vulnerable in our community.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"37-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Client-Led Integrated Care (CLIC) was implemented in general practices between 2018 and 2022 in the Southern region of New Zealand. It was envisaged to be an equitable, holistic and patient-centred inter-disciplinary framework of care for those with multiple long-term conditions; usually called multimorbidity. Aim This process evaluation aimed to determine whether CLIC supported self-management ability and assessed its alignment with current priorities for multimorbidity management. Method Mixed methods were used across four purposively selected general practices. At each practice interviews were undertaken together with participant observation over 3years. This was followed by analysis of annual self-report surveys. Results CLIC worked well for those patients who were engaged, but the implementation provided minimal consideration of the resources required for everyone to receive culturally competent integrated care. Staff reported structural difficulties and wondered if the right patients were targeted. Discussion CLIC did not address the needs of all participants, nor did it target those with the most ability to benefit. In all practices, despite increasing rates of multimorbidity and social complexity during a pandemic, the organisation of general practice and how it connected with the health system remained unchanged. Transitioning to a general practice system for complex multimorbidity will require changes in funding, strong leadership and clear communication. It requires all areas of the health system to provide an integrated health and social care system that is culturally competent and engages those most vulnerable in our community.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设想更好的护理患者复杂的多病在新西兰奥特罗阿。
客户主导的综合护理(CLIC)于2018年至2022年在新西兰南部地区的一般实践中实施。设想它是为患有多种长期疾病的人提供公平、全面和以病人为中心的跨学科护理框架;通常称为多发病。目的:本过程评估旨在确定CLIC是否支持自我管理能力,并评估其与当前多病管理优先事项的一致性。方法在四个有目的选择的全科实践中使用混合方法。在每次实践中都进行了访谈,并进行了为期3年的参与者观察。随后是对年度自我报告调查的分析。结果CLIC对那些参与的患者效果良好,但实施时很少考虑到每个人接受文化上合格的综合护理所需的资源。工作人员报告了结构上的困难,并怀疑是否针对了正确的患者。CLIC的讨论没有解决所有参与者的需求,也没有针对那些最有能力受益的人。在所有实践中,尽管在大流行期间多重发病率和社会复杂性增加,但全科实践的组织及其与卫生系统的联系方式保持不变。向复杂多发病的全科医疗系统过渡,将需要改变供资方式、强有力的领导和明确的沟通。它要求卫生系统的所有领域提供一个综合的卫生和社会保健系统,该系统在文化上具有竞争力,并使我们社区中最脆弱的人参与其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Barriers and facilitators to adverse drug reaction reporting among New Zealand community pharmacists: a qualitative investigation. Changing the Osteoarthritis Narrative in Aotearoa New Zealand. 'Point-of-Care-Testing is definitely the way to go': primary healthcare professionals in rural Aotearoa New Zealand talk about point-of-care testing for cervical cancer prevention. General practitioners' views on community pharmacists in supporting equitable cardiovascular health outcomes for Pacific peoples' : a qualitative study. Physical activity and glycaemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes in Suva, Fiji: a cross sectional pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1