Paradoxes in Mental Healthcare: Exploring Service Gaps in Treatment and Care for Patients With Extensive Hospitalization Experience.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Qualitative Health Research Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1177/10497323241309259
Henrik Wang Iversen, Henriette Riley, Geir Fagerjord Lorem
{"title":"Paradoxes in Mental Healthcare: Exploring Service Gaps in Treatment and Care for Patients With Extensive Hospitalization Experience.","authors":"Henrik Wang Iversen, Henriette Riley, Geir Fagerjord Lorem","doi":"10.1177/10497323241309259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with extensive hospitalization experience present challenges for mental healthcare by disrupting continuity of care across service systems. This study explores how mental healthcare services address the needs of these patients, focusing on service gaps between hospitalization and community services. By examining the underlying reasons for their reliance on hospitals, the study offers insights into the lived experiences of this marginalized group. The study aims to provide knowledge that can enhance treatment and care for patients with severe mental disorders. Using a narrative explanatory design, we interviewed 14 patients with extensive hospitalization experience. A holistic-content analysis revealed shortcomings in community services that contributed to frequent hospitalizations. These inconsistencies contributed to paternalistic treatment and collaboration issues, misaligning services with patients' needs. Patients were frequently labeled as \"difficult\" and placed at inappropriate levels of care, sometimes resorting to extreme measures to access the care they required. The study highlights paradoxes and contradictions between goals, policies, and service provision in mental healthcare. Patients were caught between two extremes entrenched in a struggle with services, either to gain access to support or to break free from service constraints. We argue that better access to institution-based treatment and care could provide benefits to these patients and help bridge service gap. Establishing long-term, well-staffed residential facilities would not only relieve hospitals of the burden of frequent readmissions but also enhance service integration. This would provide a much-needed middle ground, ensuring that patients receive the appropriate level of care while preventing unnecessary hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323241309259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241309259","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with extensive hospitalization experience present challenges for mental healthcare by disrupting continuity of care across service systems. This study explores how mental healthcare services address the needs of these patients, focusing on service gaps between hospitalization and community services. By examining the underlying reasons for their reliance on hospitals, the study offers insights into the lived experiences of this marginalized group. The study aims to provide knowledge that can enhance treatment and care for patients with severe mental disorders. Using a narrative explanatory design, we interviewed 14 patients with extensive hospitalization experience. A holistic-content analysis revealed shortcomings in community services that contributed to frequent hospitalizations. These inconsistencies contributed to paternalistic treatment and collaboration issues, misaligning services with patients' needs. Patients were frequently labeled as "difficult" and placed at inappropriate levels of care, sometimes resorting to extreme measures to access the care they required. The study highlights paradoxes and contradictions between goals, policies, and service provision in mental healthcare. Patients were caught between two extremes entrenched in a struggle with services, either to gain access to support or to break free from service constraints. We argue that better access to institution-based treatment and care could provide benefits to these patients and help bridge service gap. Establishing long-term, well-staffed residential facilities would not only relieve hospitals of the burden of frequent readmissions but also enhance service integration. This would provide a much-needed middle ground, ensuring that patients receive the appropriate level of care while preventing unnecessary hospitalization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神卫生保健的悖论:探索服务差距在治疗和护理的病人有广泛的住院经验。
具有广泛住院经验的患者通过破坏跨服务系统的护理连续性,对精神卫生保健提出了挑战。本研究探讨了精神卫生保健服务如何满足这些患者的需求,重点关注住院和社区服务之间的服务差距。通过检查他们依赖医院的潜在原因,该研究为这个边缘化群体的生活经历提供了见解。该研究旨在提供知识,以加强对严重精神障碍患者的治疗和护理。采用叙述性解释设计,我们采访了14名具有丰富住院经验的患者。一项整体内容分析揭示了社区服务的缺陷,这些缺陷导致了频繁的住院治疗。这些不一致导致了家长式的治疗和合作问题,使服务与患者的需求不一致。病人经常被贴上“困难”的标签,被安排在不适当的护理水平上,有时为了获得所需的护理而采取极端措施。该研究强调了精神卫生保健目标、政策和服务提供之间的悖论和矛盾。患者被夹在两个极端之间,要么是为了获得支持,要么是为了摆脱服务限制。我们认为,更好地获得基于机构的治疗和护理可以为这些患者提供好处,并有助于弥合服务差距。建立长期、人手充足的住宿设施不仅可以减轻医院频繁再入院的负担,还可以加强服务一体化。这将提供一个急需的中间地带,确保患者得到适当水平的护理,同时防止不必要的住院治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
期刊最新文献
Ethical Considerations for Learning to Use Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Health Research. Parenting on High Alert: Stress, Stigma, and Survival in Families of Children With Emotional Disturbance. AI and Qualitative Health Research: Working Through a Necessary Grieving Process. Query-Based Analysis: A Strategy for Analyzing Qualitative Data Using ChatGPT. Trust in AI Is a "Fluid Process": Building Trust of AI Through Clinicians' Needs in the BreastScreen Victoria Program-A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1