Intermittent versus Daily Therapy for Noncavitary Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease: An Open-Label Randomized Trial.

Taku Nakagawa, Kohei Fujita, Mari Miki, Akihiro Ito, Ho Namkoong, Takanori Asakura, Kozo Morimoto, Naoki Hasegawa, Toshiyuki Kita, Akira Watanabe, Kazunari Tsuyuguchi, Masahiro Kawashima, Ayako Shiozawa, Satoru Watanabe, Atsuo Sato, Tatsuo Kato, Yoshifumi Kimizuka, Hiroaki Harada, Kaori Fujita, Akiko M Saito, Hiroya Hashimoto, Yoshikazu Inoue, Kenji Ogawa
{"title":"Intermittent versus Daily Therapy for Noncavitary <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Complex Pulmonary Disease: An Open-Label Randomized Trial.","authors":"Taku Nakagawa, Kohei Fujita, Mari Miki, Akihiro Ito, Ho Namkoong, Takanori Asakura, Kozo Morimoto, Naoki Hasegawa, Toshiyuki Kita, Akira Watanabe, Kazunari Tsuyuguchi, Masahiro Kawashima, Ayako Shiozawa, Satoru Watanabe, Atsuo Sato, Tatsuo Kato, Yoshifumi Kimizuka, Hiroaki Harada, Kaori Fujita, Akiko M Saito, Hiroya Hashimoto, Yoshikazu Inoue, Kenji Ogawa","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-626OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Patients with noncavitary nodular bronchiectatic (NB) <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) are treated intermittently three times per week, although no randomized controlled trials have been conducted comparing three times weekly with daily therapy. <b>Objectives:</b> To assess the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of intermittent versus daily treatment in patients with previously untreated noncavitary NB MAC-PD. <b>Methods:</b> In an open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to the intermittent therapy group receiving clarithromycin 1,000 mg, rifampicin 600 mg, and ethambutol 25 mg/kg (maximum 1,000 mg) three days per week or the daily therapy group receiving clarithromycin 800 mg, rifampicin 450 mg, and ethambutol 15 mg/kg (maximum 750 mg) daily for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients requiring modification of the initial treatment regimen. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-one Japanese hospitals participated in the study, enrolling 141 patients between May 2019 and December 2021. The full analysis set included 138 participants (intermittent therapy = 70; daily therapy = 68). There were no significant differences between the intermittent and daily therapy groups in terms of the regimen modification rate (20.0% [14 of 70] vs. 33.8% [23 of 68]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 1.05; <i>P</i> = 0.06) or culture conversion (70.3% vs. 80.0%; <i>P</i> = 0.53), time to culture conversion (28.0 vs. 28.5 d; <i>P</i> = 0.89), improvement in chest CT findings (60.9% vs. 71.0%; <i>P</i> = 0.30), or clarithromycin resistance development (1.4% vs. 0%; <i>P</i> = 1.00). Elevated aspartate aminotransferase (16.9% vs. 41.2%; <i>P</i> = 0.003) and alanine aminotransferase (18.3% vs. 44.1%; <i>P</i> = 0.002) were more common in the daily treatment group, whereas elevated bilirubin (11.3% vs. 1.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.04) and dysgeusia (14.1% vs. 1.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.01) were more common in the intermittent treatment group. The daily treatment group exhibited a greater absolute change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical aspect score (-2.5 points) than the intermittent treatment group (2.1 points) (<i>P</i> = 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> Intermittent treatment was not significantly better tolerated than daily treatment for noncavitary NB MAC-PD. However, further studies with larger numbers of patients are needed. Clinical trial registered with https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-top (jRCTs031190008).</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1183-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-626OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Patients with noncavitary nodular bronchiectatic (NB) Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) are treated intermittently three times per week, although no randomized controlled trials have been conducted comparing three times weekly with daily therapy. Objectives: To assess the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of intermittent versus daily treatment in patients with previously untreated noncavitary NB MAC-PD. Methods: In an open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to the intermittent therapy group receiving clarithromycin 1,000 mg, rifampicin 600 mg, and ethambutol 25 mg/kg (maximum 1,000 mg) three days per week or the daily therapy group receiving clarithromycin 800 mg, rifampicin 450 mg, and ethambutol 15 mg/kg (maximum 750 mg) daily for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients requiring modification of the initial treatment regimen. Results: Twenty-one Japanese hospitals participated in the study, enrolling 141 patients between May 2019 and December 2021. The full analysis set included 138 participants (intermittent therapy = 70; daily therapy = 68). There were no significant differences between the intermittent and daily therapy groups in terms of the regimen modification rate (20.0% [14 of 70] vs. 33.8% [23 of 68]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 1.05; P = 0.06) or culture conversion (70.3% vs. 80.0%; P = 0.53), time to culture conversion (28.0 vs. 28.5 d; P = 0.89), improvement in chest CT findings (60.9% vs. 71.0%; P = 0.30), or clarithromycin resistance development (1.4% vs. 0%; P = 1.00). Elevated aspartate aminotransferase (16.9% vs. 41.2%; P = 0.003) and alanine aminotransferase (18.3% vs. 44.1%; P = 0.002) were more common in the daily treatment group, whereas elevated bilirubin (11.3% vs. 1.5%; P = 0.04) and dysgeusia (14.1% vs. 1.5%; P = 0.01) were more common in the intermittent treatment group. The daily treatment group exhibited a greater absolute change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical aspect score (-2.5 points) than the intermittent treatment group (2.1 points) (P = 0.01). Conclusions: Intermittent treatment was not significantly better tolerated than daily treatment for noncavitary NB MAC-PD. However, further studies with larger numbers of patients are needed. Clinical trial registered with https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-top (jRCTs031190008).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非腔隙分枝杆菌复合肺病间歇疗法与日常疗法的对比:一项开放标签随机试验。
理由:患有非空腔性结节性支气管扩张(NB)鸟分枝杆菌复杂肺部疾病(MAC-PD)的患者每周间歇治疗3次,尽管没有随机对照试验将每周3次与每日治疗进行比较。目的:评估先前未治疗的非空腔NB MAC-PD患者间歇治疗与每日治疗的耐受性、安全性和有效性。在一项开放标签研究中,患者被随机分配到间歇性治疗组,每周3天接受克拉霉素1000 mg、利福平600 mg和乙胺丁醇25 mg/kg(最大1000 mg),或每日治疗组,每天接受克拉霉素800 mg、利福平450 mg和乙胺丁醇15 mg/kg(最大750 mg),持续一年。主要终点是需要修改初始治疗方案的患者比例。结果:21家日本医院参与了这项研究,在2019年5月至2021年12月期间招募了141名患者。完整的分析集包括138名参与者(间歇治疗= 70;每日治疗= 68)。间歇治疗组和每日治疗组在方案修改率方面无显著差异(20.0% (14/70)vs 33.8% (23/68);校正优势比0.48,95%可信区间0.22 ~ 1.05;p=0.06)或培养转化(70.3% vs. 80.0%, p=0.53)、培养转化时间(28.0 vs. 28.5天,p=0.89)、胸部CT表现改善(60.9% vs. 71.0%, p=0.30)或克拉霉素耐药性发展(1.4% vs. 0%, p=1.00)。谷丙转氨酶升高(16.9%比41.2%,p=0.003)和谷丙转氨酶升高(18.3%比44.1%,p=0.002)在每日治疗组更为常见,而胆红素升高(11.3%比1.5%,p=0.04)和认知障碍(14.1%比1.5%,p=0.01)在间歇治疗组更为常见。每日治疗组在36项短表调查身体方面得分(-2.5分)上的绝对变化大于间歇治疗组(2.1分)(p=0.01)。结论:间歇性治疗的耐受性并不比每日治疗的耐受性好。然而,需要对更多患者进行进一步的研究。临床试验注册网址:https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-top。ID: jRCTs031190008。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation for people with post-tuberculosis lung disease in Kyrgyzstan: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and asthma in a nationwide study of U.S. adults. Age, sex, smoking-specific prevalence and progression in interstitial lung abnormality: patient-level meta-analysis. Low-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Nintedanib at Initiation in Fibrosing ILD: A Target-Trial Emulation of Treatment Persistence and Lung Function. Consensus palliative care referral criteria for people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: An international Delphi study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1