Reduced dosing of lenvatinib with pembrolizumab for advanced endometrial cancer

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.034
Quang D. Ta , Connie Do , Kavita Sharma , Hormozan (Zan) Sorooshian , Merta Cushing , Nina Shah , Juraj Kavecansky , Michael Bookman , Fang Niu , Rita Hui
{"title":"Reduced dosing of lenvatinib with pembrolizumab for advanced endometrial cancer","authors":"Quang D. Ta ,&nbsp;Connie Do ,&nbsp;Kavita Sharma ,&nbsp;Hormozan (Zan) Sorooshian ,&nbsp;Merta Cushing ,&nbsp;Nina Shah ,&nbsp;Juraj Kavecansky ,&nbsp;Michael Bookman ,&nbsp;Fang Niu ,&nbsp;Rita Hui","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Evaluate safety and effectiveness of reduced lenvatinib doses with pembrolizumab in patients with mismatch repair-proficient (MMRp) advanced endometrial cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective cohort study of lenvatinib-pembrolizumab combination therapy, patients were grouped based on initial lenvatinib dose: 20 mg daily (Group 1), less than 20 mg daily (Group 2), and 20 mg daily five days per week (Group 3). The primary outcome was six-month progression-free survival (PFS-6); safety outcomes included incidences of lenvatinib dose discontinuation or reduction due to adverse events (AEs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 369 patients (Group 1, <em>n</em> = 204, Group 2, <em>n</em> = 154, and Group 3, <em>n</em> = 11). There was no difference in PFS-6 between Groups 1 and 2 (40.2 % vs 33.8 % respectively; <em>p</em> = 0.26) or median PFS (both 4.2 months; <em>p</em> = 0.92). A significantly higher incidence in lenvatinib dose reduction was found in Group 1 (28.1 vs 14.3 per 100 person-year; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). However, there was no difference in AE-related lenvatinib dose discontinuation between Groups 1 and 2 (7.2 vs 6.6 per 100 person-year, respectively; <em>p</em> = 0.61).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Full-dose lenvatinib has been associated with frequent dose modification without prospective data to guide optimization. We found no difference in PFS-6 or median PFS between starting doses of 20 mg daily versus &lt;20 mg daily in combination with pembrolizumab. Fewer dose reductions were experienced with a lower starting dose. However, no difference in dose discontinuation was observed. These findings suggest lower initial lenvatinib doses may be better tolerated without compromising effectiveness, although the lower limit of effective dosing remains to be defined.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"196 ","pages":"Pages 36-41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825001118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Evaluate safety and effectiveness of reduced lenvatinib doses with pembrolizumab in patients with mismatch repair-proficient (MMRp) advanced endometrial cancer.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study of lenvatinib-pembrolizumab combination therapy, patients were grouped based on initial lenvatinib dose: 20 mg daily (Group 1), less than 20 mg daily (Group 2), and 20 mg daily five days per week (Group 3). The primary outcome was six-month progression-free survival (PFS-6); safety outcomes included incidences of lenvatinib dose discontinuation or reduction due to adverse events (AEs).

Results

This study included 369 patients (Group 1, n = 204, Group 2, n = 154, and Group 3, n = 11). There was no difference in PFS-6 between Groups 1 and 2 (40.2 % vs 33.8 % respectively; p = 0.26) or median PFS (both 4.2 months; p = 0.92). A significantly higher incidence in lenvatinib dose reduction was found in Group 1 (28.1 vs 14.3 per 100 person-year; p < 0.01). However, there was no difference in AE-related lenvatinib dose discontinuation between Groups 1 and 2 (7.2 vs 6.6 per 100 person-year, respectively; p = 0.61).

Conclusion

Full-dose lenvatinib has been associated with frequent dose modification without prospective data to guide optimization. We found no difference in PFS-6 or median PFS between starting doses of 20 mg daily versus <20 mg daily in combination with pembrolizumab. Fewer dose reductions were experienced with a lower starting dose. However, no difference in dose discontinuation was observed. These findings suggest lower initial lenvatinib doses may be better tolerated without compromising effectiveness, although the lower limit of effective dosing remains to be defined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减低lenvatinib与pembrolizumab治疗晚期子宫内膜癌的剂量
目的评价低剂量lenvatinib联合派姆单抗治疗晚期子宫内膜癌(MMRp)患者的安全性和有效性。方法在这项lenvatinib-pembrolizumab联合治疗的回顾性队列研究中,患者根据lenvatinib的初始剂量分组:每天20mg(组1),每天小于20mg(组2),每周5天每天20mg(组3)。主要结局是6个月无进展生存期(PFS-6);安全性指标包括lenvatinib因不良事件(ae)而停药或减少剂量的发生率。结果本研究共纳入369例患者(组1,n = 204,组2,n = 154,组3,n = 11)。1组和2组PFS-6无差异(分别为40.2%和33.8%;p = 0.26)或中位PFS(均为4.2个月;p = 0.92)。第1组lenvatinib剂量减少的发生率明显更高(28.1 vs 14.3 / 100人年;p & lt;0.01)。然而,与ae相关的lenvatinib剂量停药在1组和2组之间没有差异(分别为7.2 vs 6.6 / 100人年;p = 0.61)。结论全剂量lenvatinib与频繁的剂量调整有关,没有前瞻性数据来指导优化。我们发现起始剂量每日20mg与每日20mg联合派姆单抗的PFS-6或中位PFS无差异。起始剂量越低,剂量减少越少。然而,在剂量停药方面没有观察到差异。这些发现表明,较低的lenvatinib初始剂量可能具有更好的耐受性而不影响疗效,尽管有效剂量的下限仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic oncology
Gynecologic oncology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.40%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published. Research Areas Include: • Cell and molecular biology • Chemotherapy • Cytology • Endocrinology • Epidemiology • Genetics • Gynecologic surgery • Immunology • Pathology • Radiotherapy
期刊最新文献
Survival outcomes and time toxicity of Sandwich versus Sequential chemoradiation in Stage III endometrial cancer: A real-world study stratified by molecular classification. Lifetime ovulations and endometrial cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy after negative PET-CT in locally advanced cervical cancer: a continuous monocentric series of 320 cases. Pre-operative cross-sectional imaging of chest, abdomen, pelvis is not cost-effective for low-grade endometrial cancer. CDO1 and CELF4 methylation assay as the dominant predictor of endometrial cancer: A cohort analysis across pre- and post-menopausal cohorts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1