Association of Clinical Indicators of Acute Deterioration and Morbidity and Mortality in the Residential Aged Care Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Routinely Collected Health Data
Julie Frances Daltrey, Michal Kathleen Boyd, Vanessa Burholt, Heather McLeod, W. U. Zhenqiang, Katherine Bloomfield, Jacqualine Robinson
{"title":"Association of Clinical Indicators of Acute Deterioration and Morbidity and Mortality in the Residential Aged Care Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Routinely Collected Health Data","authors":"Julie Frances Daltrey, Michal Kathleen Boyd, Vanessa Burholt, Heather McLeod, W. U. Zhenqiang, Katherine Bloomfield, Jacqualine Robinson","doi":"10.1111/jep.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The timely identification of acute deterioration in people living in residential aged care is critical to reducing rates of resident morbidity and mortality. However, residents often present with atypical or nonspecific presentations that make this difficult. This study aimed to quantify the strength of the relationship between the indicators acute deterioration reported in the literature and morbidity and mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort study using routinely collected health data. A single dependant acute deterioration variable (emergency department presentation or hospital admission or death within 7 days of the last completed international resident assessment instrument long-term care facility (interRAI-LTCF) assessment) was correlated with indicators of acute deterioration reported in the literature and available in interRAI-LTCF. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated this association.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Nine variables were independently associated with acute deterioration. These were being ‘largely asleep or unresponsive’ odds ratio (OR): 7.95, 95% CI: 4.72–13.39, <i>p</i> < 0.001, ‘easily distracted’ (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.28–2.49, <i>p</i> < 0.001), eating ‘one or fewer meals a day’ (OR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.67–2.73, <i>p</i> < 0.001), reduced activities of daily living (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.11–3.82, <i>p</i> = 0.02) inability to complete toilet transfer (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.24–3.03, <i>p</i> = 0.004), ‘dyspnoea; at rest’ (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.32–2.49, <i>p</i> < 0.001), ‘two or more falls in 30 days’ (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.15–2.03, <i>p</i> = 0.003), peripheral oedema (OR: 1.37, 95 CI: 1.07–1.77, <i>p</i> = 0.014) and daily pain (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05–1.77, <i>p</i> = 0.019).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Presenting with one of nine variables made residents between 1.4 and 8 times more likely to be experiencing acute deterioration than others living in the facility. The monitoring the resident for these variables by healthcare assistants could support the timely identification of acute deterioration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>Not applicable.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The timely identification of acute deterioration in people living in residential aged care is critical to reducing rates of resident morbidity and mortality. However, residents often present with atypical or nonspecific presentations that make this difficult. This study aimed to quantify the strength of the relationship between the indicators acute deterioration reported in the literature and morbidity and mortality.
Method
A retrospective cohort study using routinely collected health data. A single dependant acute deterioration variable (emergency department presentation or hospital admission or death within 7 days of the last completed international resident assessment instrument long-term care facility (interRAI-LTCF) assessment) was correlated with indicators of acute deterioration reported in the literature and available in interRAI-LTCF. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated this association.
Results
Nine variables were independently associated with acute deterioration. These were being ‘largely asleep or unresponsive’ odds ratio (OR): 7.95, 95% CI: 4.72–13.39, p < 0.001, ‘easily distracted’ (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.28–2.49, p < 0.001), eating ‘one or fewer meals a day’ (OR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.67–2.73, p < 0.001), reduced activities of daily living (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.11–3.82, p = 0.02) inability to complete toilet transfer (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.24–3.03, p = 0.004), ‘dyspnoea; at rest’ (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.32–2.49, p < 0.001), ‘two or more falls in 30 days’ (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.15–2.03, p = 0.003), peripheral oedema (OR: 1.37, 95 CI: 1.07–1.77, p = 0.014) and daily pain (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05–1.77, p = 0.019).
Conclusion
Presenting with one of nine variables made residents between 1.4 and 8 times more likely to be experiencing acute deterioration than others living in the facility. The monitoring the resident for these variables by healthcare assistants could support the timely identification of acute deterioration.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.