The Composite Number Needed to Treat for Semaglutide in Populations with Overweight or Obesity and Established Cardiovascular Disease Without Diabetes

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1007/s12325-025-03176-w
Christopher Lübker, Jigish Bhavsar, Ruben Duque do Vale, Scott S. Emerson, Emil Nørtoft, Jorge Plutzky, Geraint Roberts, Jens Magelund Tarp, A. Michael Lincoff
{"title":"The Composite Number Needed to Treat for Semaglutide in Populations with Overweight or Obesity and Established Cardiovascular Disease Without Diabetes","authors":"Christopher Lübker,&nbsp;Jigish Bhavsar,&nbsp;Ruben Duque do Vale,&nbsp;Scott S. Emerson,&nbsp;Emil Nørtoft,&nbsp;Jorge Plutzky,&nbsp;Geraint Roberts,&nbsp;Jens Magelund Tarp,&nbsp;A. Michael Lincoff","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03176-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Number needed to treat (NNT), an outcome measure derived from the estimated risk results of clinical trials, is widely used to demonstrate value to stakeholders by identifying how many patients require treatment to avoid one event of interest. However, NNTs calculated for primary trial endpoints may underestimate a treatment’s value by not considering other outcomes. In this secondary analysis of data from the SELECT cardiovascular (CV) outcomes trial, we aimed to determine the NNT for semaglutide for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), in addition to NNTs when other clinically and payer-relevant outcomes are included.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study is a secondary analysis of data from the randomized, double-blind SELECT trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574597) of once-weekly subcutaneous administration of semaglutide compared with placebo in 17,604 patients with overweight or obesity and with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) (39.8 months mean follow-up). The outcomes were NNT<sub>3P-MACE</sub> (based upon the trial’s composite primary endpoint of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke), NNT<sub>EXTENDED</sub> (inclusive of NNT<sub>3P-MACE</sub>, hospitalization for any cause, coronary revascularization, and non-CV death), and NNT<sub>CKM</sub> (inclusive of NNT<sub>EXTENDED</sub>, glycated hemoglobin level [HbA<sub>1c</sub>] ≥ 6.5%, and a 5-point nephropathy composite).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The relative risk reductions observed for the events comprising the NNTs were 20% (NNT<sub>3P-MACE</sub>), 20% (NNT<sub>EXTENDED</sub>), and 41% (NNT<sub>CKM</sub>). At 1 and 4 years post initiation of semaglutide, NNT<sub>3P-MACE</sub> was 125 and 58, NNT<sub>EXTENDED</sub> was 49 and 25, and NNT<sub>CKM</sub> was 20 and 11, respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>When clinically and payer-relevant outcomes from the SELECT trial are included in calculations of NNT, semaglutide was associated with greater risk reductions and lower estimates of NNT than for the primary endpoint alone. Our findings suggest that including the broader effects of semaglutide beyond the primary trial endpoint recognizes additional value to stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 5","pages":"2513 - 2525"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03176-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03176-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Number needed to treat (NNT), an outcome measure derived from the estimated risk results of clinical trials, is widely used to demonstrate value to stakeholders by identifying how many patients require treatment to avoid one event of interest. However, NNTs calculated for primary trial endpoints may underestimate a treatment’s value by not considering other outcomes. In this secondary analysis of data from the SELECT cardiovascular (CV) outcomes trial, we aimed to determine the NNT for semaglutide for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), in addition to NNTs when other clinically and payer-relevant outcomes are included.

Methods

This study is a secondary analysis of data from the randomized, double-blind SELECT trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574597) of once-weekly subcutaneous administration of semaglutide compared with placebo in 17,604 patients with overweight or obesity and with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) (39.8 months mean follow-up). The outcomes were NNT3P-MACE (based upon the trial’s composite primary endpoint of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke), NNTEXTENDED (inclusive of NNT3P-MACE, hospitalization for any cause, coronary revascularization, and non-CV death), and NNTCKM (inclusive of NNTEXTENDED, glycated hemoglobin level [HbA1c] ≥ 6.5%, and a 5-point nephropathy composite).

Results

The relative risk reductions observed for the events comprising the NNTs were 20% (NNT3P-MACE), 20% (NNTEXTENDED), and 41% (NNTCKM). At 1 and 4 years post initiation of semaglutide, NNT3P-MACE was 125 and 58, NNTEXTENDED was 49 and 25, and NNTCKM was 20 and 11, respectively.

Conclusion

When clinically and payer-relevant outcomes from the SELECT trial are included in calculations of NNT, semaglutide was associated with greater risk reductions and lower estimates of NNT than for the primary endpoint alone. Our findings suggest that including the broader effects of semaglutide beyond the primary trial endpoint recognizes additional value to stakeholders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西马鲁肽治疗超重或肥胖人群和无糖尿病心血管疾病患者所需的综合数量
需要治疗的数量(NNT)是一种从临床试验的估计风险结果中得出的结果度量,通过确定有多少患者需要治疗来避免一个感兴趣的事件,被广泛用于向利益相关者展示价值。然而,为主要试验终点计算的nnt可能因未考虑其他结果而低估了治疗的价值。在这项对SELECT心血管(CV)结局试验数据的二次分析中,我们旨在确定西马鲁肽治疗主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的NNT,以及包括其他临床和付款人相关结局的NNT。方法:本研究是对随机双盲SELECT试验(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574597)数据的二次分析,该试验在17,604例超重或肥胖并有心血管疾病(CVD)的患者(平均随访39.8个月)中,每周一次皮下给药semaglutide与安慰剂相比。结果为NNT3P-MACE(基于试验的心血管原因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中的复合主要终点)、NNT3P-MACE(包括NNT3P-MACE、任何原因住院、冠状动脉血运重建术和非cv死亡)和NNTCKM(包括NNT3P-MACE、糖化血红蛋白水平[HbA1c]≥6.5%和5点肾病复合)。结果:包含nnt的事件的相对风险降低为20% (NNT3P-MACE), 20% (nnextended)和41% (NNTCKM)。在西马鲁肽开始治疗后1年和4年,nntp3 - mace分别为125和58,nnextended分别为49和25,NNTCKM分别为20和11。结论:当SELECT试验的临床和支付者相关结果包括在NNT的计算中时,与单独的主要终点相比,semaglutide与更大的风险降低和更低的NNT估计值相关。我们的研究结果表明,包括西马鲁肽在主要试验终点之外的更广泛的影响,可以认识到利益相关者的额外价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Frequency, Severity and Spectrum of Cognitive Impairment and Its Associated Risk Factors in Elderly Individuals with Diabetes in India: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Efficacy and Safety of Ravagalimab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Data from a Phase 2a Trial. Single-Pill Combination Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide Safety and Effectiveness in Older Patients with Hypertension: Pooled Analysis of Post-Approval Observational Studies. Understanding Patient Preferences on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment Modalities and Outcomes: A Global Targeted Literature Review. Phase III Prospective Randomised Study of Netarsudil and Concomitant Latanoprost Efficacy and Safety for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension in Japan: J-ROCKET-2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1