Worldwide trends in the quality and breadth of clinical investigations of medical devices over the past decade: a scoping review and evidence map.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08793-y
David F Keane, Cherian Mathew, Ryan Longley, Rosie Dunne, Thomas Mathew, Elaine Harris, Paddy Gillespie, Abhay Pandit, Matthew D Griffin
{"title":"Worldwide trends in the quality and breadth of clinical investigations of medical devices over the past decade: a scoping review and evidence map.","authors":"David F Keane, Cherian Mathew, Ryan Longley, Rosie Dunne, Thomas Mathew, Elaine Harris, Paddy Gillespie, Abhay Pandit, Matthew D Griffin","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08793-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent regulatory developments in Europe have enhanced the requirements for clinical investigations of medical devices, partly in response to a perceived need for a higher level of evidence that is publicly available. This scoping review aims to map published clinical investigations of medical devices by device type and clinical specialty and summarise key trial design aspects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a search for EMBASE that identified clinical investigations of medical devices during two discrete 3-month periods at the end of 2012 and of 2022. Core information from observational studies was extracted along with details on study design in interventional studies. We developed an evidence map of published studies across device type and clinical specialty and summarised study design aspects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 682 studies from 2012 and 1682 studies from 2022. Around a quarter of studies were interventional and the remainder being observational and primary outcomes of effectiveness were more common than efficacy. Key study design aspects were frequently unreported, including sample size justification, registration, randomisation technique and funders. Our evidence map demonstrated that predominantly, investigations were of implants and were in a cardiovascular setting. Clinical investigations were broadly similar between 2012 and 2022, though there was a reduction in the proportion of cardiovascular studies, a move in the share of studies coming out of Europe and North America towards Asia and a general improvement in the quality of study design reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implanted devices in cardiovascular disease and orthopaedics are the focus of a large proportion of published clinical investigations of medical devices. Reporting of key study design aspects of clinical investigations of medical devices are improving but are still below expected requirements.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>A pre-specified and published protocol was registered on figshare: doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22276945.v1 on 15/03/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08793-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent regulatory developments in Europe have enhanced the requirements for clinical investigations of medical devices, partly in response to a perceived need for a higher level of evidence that is publicly available. This scoping review aims to map published clinical investigations of medical devices by device type and clinical specialty and summarise key trial design aspects.

Methods: We developed a search for EMBASE that identified clinical investigations of medical devices during two discrete 3-month periods at the end of 2012 and of 2022. Core information from observational studies was extracted along with details on study design in interventional studies. We developed an evidence map of published studies across device type and clinical specialty and summarised study design aspects.

Results: We included 682 studies from 2012 and 1682 studies from 2022. Around a quarter of studies were interventional and the remainder being observational and primary outcomes of effectiveness were more common than efficacy. Key study design aspects were frequently unreported, including sample size justification, registration, randomisation technique and funders. Our evidence map demonstrated that predominantly, investigations were of implants and were in a cardiovascular setting. Clinical investigations were broadly similar between 2012 and 2022, though there was a reduction in the proportion of cardiovascular studies, a move in the share of studies coming out of Europe and North America towards Asia and a general improvement in the quality of study design reported.

Conclusions: Implanted devices in cardiovascular disease and orthopaedics are the focus of a large proportion of published clinical investigations of medical devices. Reporting of key study design aspects of clinical investigations of medical devices are improving but are still below expected requirements.

Registration: A pre-specified and published protocol was registered on figshare: doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22276945.v1 on 15/03/2023.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过去十年医疗器械临床研究的质量和广度的全球趋势:范围审查和证据图。
背景:欧洲最近的监管发展提高了对医疗器械临床调查的要求,部分原因是人们认为需要更高水平的公开证据。此范围审查的目的是绘制已发表的医疗器械临床调查,按器械类型和临床专业,并总结关键的试验设计方面。方法:我们开发了EMBASE搜索,确定了2012年底和2022年两个离散的3个月期间医疗器械的临床调查。观察性研究的核心信息与介入性研究的研究设计细节一起被提取出来。我们开发了一个证据图,涵盖了器械类型和临床专业的已发表研究,并总结了研究设计方面的内容。结果:我们纳入2012年的682项研究和2022年的1682项研究。大约四分之一的研究是干预性的,其余的是观察性的,有效性的主要结果比疗效更常见。关键的研究设计方面经常未被报道,包括样本量论证、注册、随机化技术和资助者。我们的证据图显示,主要调查的是植入物,并在心血管设置。临床研究在2012年至2022年期间大致相似,尽管心血管研究的比例有所减少,欧洲和北美的研究份额向亚洲转移,研究设计质量普遍提高。结论:在已发表的医疗器械临床研究中,很大一部分是针对心血管疾病和骨科的植入式器械。医疗器械临床研究的关键研究设计方面的报告正在改善,但仍低于预期的要求。注册:于2023年3月15日在figshare: doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22276945.v1上注册了一个预先指定和发布的协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
ERNIE-Evaluating Response to an individualized Neuropsychological IntervEntion for children with brain tumors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. A phase I/II randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the feasibility, safety, and preliminary effectiveness of paracetamol in resolving acute kidney injury in children with severe malaria. Study protocol for a pragmatic, cluster, randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted fracture prevention model for long-term care: the PREVENT trial. Piperacillin-tazobactam/meropenem vs colistin/meropenem for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae-related ventilator-associated pneumonia. Outcomes and Health Economics of Stroke using Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (OrcHESTRAS): a protocol for a pragmatic, decentralized, longitudinal, multi-phase, withdrawal with randomized re-treatment trial of MR-001 in chronic stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1