Methods and clinical outcomes in vestibular implantation - A systematic literature review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1177/09574271251332157
Jonathan Olsgård Hansen, Hjalte Christian Reeberg Sass, Niels Cramer West, Per Cayé-Thomasen
{"title":"Methods and clinical outcomes in vestibular implantation - A systematic literature review.","authors":"Jonathan Olsgård Hansen, Hjalte Christian Reeberg Sass, Niels Cramer West, Per Cayé-Thomasen","doi":"10.1177/09574271251332157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe vestibular implant is an experimental device that may provide treatment to patients suffering from bilateral vestibulopathy who do not benefit from standard vestibular rehabilitation.ObjectiveThe objective is to identify the various methodology regarding device designs and surgical approaches in addition to assessing subjective and objective vestibular and clinical outcomes in order to evaluate the future and possible limitations of the vestibular implant.MethodsA systematic search of Medline and Embase was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. 350 hits were found, which after 2 rounds of screening by 2 independent reviewers resulted in 21 studies eligible for full-text review.ResultsA total of 36 recipients of a vestibular implant across four centres world-wide were identified. Both surgical approach and devices as well as vestibular and functional outcomes varied greatly across centres and from patient to patient, evaluated using a variety of objective and subjective tests.ConclusionSeveral promising results in vestibular implantation were found using both subjective and objective measurements. However, some questions with regards to hearing preservation and long-term, continuous use of the vestibular implant remain to be answered, and more studies are needed to assess the efficacy and cost-utility of the implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":" ","pages":"172-184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09574271251332157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe vestibular implant is an experimental device that may provide treatment to patients suffering from bilateral vestibulopathy who do not benefit from standard vestibular rehabilitation.ObjectiveThe objective is to identify the various methodology regarding device designs and surgical approaches in addition to assessing subjective and objective vestibular and clinical outcomes in order to evaluate the future and possible limitations of the vestibular implant.MethodsA systematic search of Medline and Embase was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. 350 hits were found, which after 2 rounds of screening by 2 independent reviewers resulted in 21 studies eligible for full-text review.ResultsA total of 36 recipients of a vestibular implant across four centres world-wide were identified. Both surgical approach and devices as well as vestibular and functional outcomes varied greatly across centres and from patient to patient, evaluated using a variety of objective and subjective tests.ConclusionSeveral promising results in vestibular implantation were found using both subjective and objective measurements. However, some questions with regards to hearing preservation and long-term, continuous use of the vestibular implant remain to be answered, and more studies are needed to assess the efficacy and cost-utility of the implant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前庭植入术的方法和临床效果-系统文献综述。
前庭植入物是一种实验性装置,可以为不能从标准前庭康复中获益的双侧前庭病变患者提供治疗。目的除了评估主观和客观的前庭和临床结果外,目的是确定关于设备设计和手术入路的各种方法,以评估前庭植入物的未来和可能的局限性。方法根据PRISMA指南,采用预先设定的纳入和排除标准,对Medline和Embase进行系统检索。经过2位独立审稿人的2轮筛选,共有21项研究符合全文审查的条件。结果在全球四个中心共鉴定了36例前庭植入物受者。手术入路和设备以及前庭和功能结果在不同中心和患者之间差异很大,使用各种客观和主观测试进行评估。结论通过主观和客观的测量,发现前庭植入术的一些有希望的结果。然而,关于听力保护和长期持续使用前庭植入物的一些问题仍有待回答,需要更多的研究来评估植入物的疗效和成本-效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following: Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways Balance disorders Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems Psychophysics of spatial orientation Space and motion sickness Vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular-related human performance in various environments
期刊最新文献
Adaptation and validation of the Niigata PPPD questionnaire in Turkish: A clinical study. The six-item visual vertigo analogue scale: A modified questionnaire for assessment of visual vertigo. Head tilt-induced spatial orientation errors associated with functional vestibular disorders and motion sickness susceptibility during non-driving activities in a moving vehicle. The forgotten piece of a complex jigsaw: Vestibular assessment is a blind spot for England's NHS falls services. Predictive modeling of maneuver numbers in BPPV therapy using machine learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1