Ritesh Kumar, Minh Canh Vu, Peiyuan Ma, Chibueze V. Amanchukwu
{"title":"Electrolytomics: A Unified Big Data Approach for Electrolyte Design and Discovery","authors":"Ritesh Kumar, Minh Canh Vu, Peiyuan Ma, Chibueze V. Amanchukwu","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c03196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electrolyte discovery is the bottleneck for developing next-generation batteries. For example, lithium metal batteries (LMBs) promise to double the energy density of current Li-ion batteries (LIBs), while next-generation LIBs are desired for operations at extreme temperature conditions and with high voltage cathodes. However, there are no suitable electrolytes to support these battery chemistries. Electrolyte requirements are complex (conductivity, stability, safety), and the chemical design space (salts, solvents, additives, concentration) is practically infinite; hence, discovery is primarily guided through trial and error, which slows the deployment of such next-generation battery chemistries. Inspired by artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled drug discovery, we adapt these machine learning (ML) approaches to electrolyte discovery. We assemble the largest small molecule experimental liquid electrolyte ionic conductivity data set and build highly accurate ML and deep learning models to predict ionic conductivity across a wide range of electrolyte classes. The developed models yield results similar to those of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and are interpretable without explicit encoding of ionic solvation. While most ML-based approaches target a single property, we build additional models of oxidative stability and Coulombic efficiency and develop a metric called the electrolyte score (<i>eScore</i>) to unify the predicted disparate electrolyte properties. Deploying these models on large unlabeled data sets, we discover distinct electrolyte solvents, experimentally validate that the electrolyte is conductive (>1 mS cm<sup>–1</sup>), stable up to 6 V, supports efficient anode-free LMB, and even LIB cycling at extreme temperatures. Our work marks a significant step toward efficient electrolyte design, accelerating the development and deployment of next-generation battery technologies.","PeriodicalId":33,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry of Materials","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry of Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c03196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Electrolyte discovery is the bottleneck for developing next-generation batteries. For example, lithium metal batteries (LMBs) promise to double the energy density of current Li-ion batteries (LIBs), while next-generation LIBs are desired for operations at extreme temperature conditions and with high voltage cathodes. However, there are no suitable electrolytes to support these battery chemistries. Electrolyte requirements are complex (conductivity, stability, safety), and the chemical design space (salts, solvents, additives, concentration) is practically infinite; hence, discovery is primarily guided through trial and error, which slows the deployment of such next-generation battery chemistries. Inspired by artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled drug discovery, we adapt these machine learning (ML) approaches to electrolyte discovery. We assemble the largest small molecule experimental liquid electrolyte ionic conductivity data set and build highly accurate ML and deep learning models to predict ionic conductivity across a wide range of electrolyte classes. The developed models yield results similar to those of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and are interpretable without explicit encoding of ionic solvation. While most ML-based approaches target a single property, we build additional models of oxidative stability and Coulombic efficiency and develop a metric called the electrolyte score (eScore) to unify the predicted disparate electrolyte properties. Deploying these models on large unlabeled data sets, we discover distinct electrolyte solvents, experimentally validate that the electrolyte is conductive (>1 mS cm–1), stable up to 6 V, supports efficient anode-free LMB, and even LIB cycling at extreme temperatures. Our work marks a significant step toward efficient electrolyte design, accelerating the development and deployment of next-generation battery technologies.
电解质的发现是下一代电池开发的瓶颈。例如,锂金属电池(lmb)有望将当前锂离子电池(lib)的能量密度提高一倍,而下一代锂离子电池则需要在极端温度条件下和高压阴极下工作。然而,没有合适的电解质来支持这些电池的化学性质。电解液的要求是复杂的(电导率,稳定性,安全性),化学设计空间(盐,溶剂,添加剂,浓度)几乎是无限的;因此,发现主要是通过试验和错误来引导的,这减慢了下一代电池化学物质的部署。受人工智能(AI)药物发现的启发,我们将这些机器学习(ML)方法应用于电解质发现。我们组装了最大的小分子实验液体电解质离子电导率数据集,并建立了高度精确的ML和深度学习模型,以预测各种电解质类别的离子电导率。所建立的模型产生的结果与分子动力学(MD)模拟的结果相似,并且不需要明确的离子溶剂化编码就可以解释。虽然大多数基于ml的方法都针对单一性质,但我们建立了氧化稳定性和库仑效率的额外模型,并开发了一种称为电解质评分(eScore)的指标,以统一预测的不同电解质性质。将这些模型部署到大型未标记数据集上,我们发现了不同的电解质溶剂,实验验证了电解质具有导电性(1 mS cm-1),稳定高达6 V,支持高效的无阳极LMB,甚至在极端温度下支持LIB循环。我们的工作标志着朝着高效电解质设计迈出了重要的一步,加速了下一代电池技术的开发和部署。
期刊介绍:
The journal Chemistry of Materials focuses on publishing original research at the intersection of materials science and chemistry. The studies published in the journal involve chemistry as a prominent component and explore topics such as the design, synthesis, characterization, processing, understanding, and application of functional or potentially functional materials. The journal covers various areas of interest, including inorganic and organic solid-state chemistry, nanomaterials, biomaterials, thin films and polymers, and composite/hybrid materials. The journal particularly seeks papers that highlight the creation or development of innovative materials with novel optical, electrical, magnetic, catalytic, or mechanical properties. It is essential that manuscripts on these topics have a primary focus on the chemistry of materials and represent a significant advancement compared to prior research. Before external reviews are sought, submitted manuscripts undergo a review process by a minimum of two editors to ensure their appropriateness for the journal and the presence of sufficient evidence of a significant advance that will be of broad interest to the materials chemistry community.