Association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY European Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejpsy.2025.100308
Ling Gui , Haiyan Yu , Yuxin Wei , Qichao Huang , Yuyao Liu , Yixiao Fu
{"title":"Association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ling Gui ,&nbsp;Haiyan Yu ,&nbsp;Yuxin Wei ,&nbsp;Qichao Huang ,&nbsp;Yuyao Liu ,&nbsp;Yixiao Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2025.100308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a systemic indicator of inflammation and stress, shows inconsistent associations with bipolar disorder (BD). This meta-analysis will investigate NLR's diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic relevance in BD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library, using key terms ‘bipolar disorder’, ‘neutrophils’, ‘lymphocytes’, and ‘ratio’ yielded 31 studies assessed via Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses and publication bias assessments were conducted to explore heterogeneity sources and result stability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The NLR values in BDs were significantly higher than those in healthy controls (HCs) (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.51, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–0.62, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001; odds ratio [OR] = 1.87, 95 % CI: 1.27–2.74, <em>p</em> = 0.001). The association was most pronounced between bipolar mania (BDM) and HC (SMD = 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.57–0.76, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001, I² = 47 %). Additionally, BDM exhibited higher NLR than bipolar depression (BDD) and bipolar patients in euthymic episode (BDE) (SMD = 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.07–0.38, <em>p</em> = 0.04, I² = 42 %; SMD = 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.15–0.48, <em>p</em> = 0.0001, I² = 60 %, respectively). No significant differences were observed between BDD and HC (SMD = 0.30, 95 % CI: -0.05–0.64, <em>p</em> = 0.09). Subgroup analyses suggested that age may influence the association between NLR and BD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An elevated NLR value is found in BD, particularly in BDM. However, the difference between BDD and HC is not statistically significant. NLR may be a potent biomarker for the identification and evaluation of BD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"39 3","pages":"Article 100308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616325000199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a systemic indicator of inflammation and stress, shows inconsistent associations with bipolar disorder (BD). This meta-analysis will investigate NLR's diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic relevance in BD.

Methods

A systematic search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library, using key terms ‘bipolar disorder’, ‘neutrophils’, ‘lymphocytes’, and ‘ratio’ yielded 31 studies assessed via Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses and publication bias assessments were conducted to explore heterogeneity sources and result stability.

Results

The NLR values in BDs were significantly higher than those in healthy controls (HCs) (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.51, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–0.62, p < 0.0001; odds ratio [OR] = 1.87, 95 % CI: 1.27–2.74, p = 0.001). The association was most pronounced between bipolar mania (BDM) and HC (SMD = 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.57–0.76, p < 0.0001, I² = 47 %). Additionally, BDM exhibited higher NLR than bipolar depression (BDD) and bipolar patients in euthymic episode (BDE) (SMD = 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.07–0.38, p = 0.04, I² = 42 %; SMD = 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.15–0.48, p = 0.0001, I² = 60 %, respectively). No significant differences were observed between BDD and HC (SMD = 0.30, 95 % CI: -0.05–0.64, p = 0.09). Subgroup analyses suggested that age may influence the association between NLR and BD.

Conclusion

An elevated NLR value is found in BD, particularly in BDM. However, the difference between BDD and HC is not statistically significant. NLR may be a potent biomarker for the identification and evaluation of BD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率与双相情感障碍之间的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
目的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)是炎症和应激的系统性指标,与双相情感障碍(BD)的相关性不一致。本荟萃分析将调查NLR在bd中的诊断、预后和治疗相关性。方法系统搜索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、PsycINFO和Cochrane图书馆,使用关键词“双相情感障碍”、“中性粒细胞”、“淋巴细胞”和“比率”,获得31项研究,通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。通过敏感性分析、亚组分析和发表偏倚评估来探索异质性来源和结果稳定性。结果bd组NLR值显著高于健康对照组(HCs)(标准化平均差值[SMD] = 0.51, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.40 ~ 0.62, p <;0.0001;优势比[OR] = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.27-2.74, p = 0.001)。双相躁狂症(BDM)与HC的相关性最为显著(SMD = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57-0.76, p <;0.0001, i²= 47%)。此外,BDM患者的NLR高于双相抑郁症(BDD)和双相心境发作(BDE)患者(SMD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07-0.38, p = 0.04, I²= 42%;SMD = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15 ~ 0.48, p = 0.0001, I²= 60%)。BDD与HC之间无显著差异(SMD = 0.30, 95% CI: -0.05 ~ 0.64, p = 0.09)。亚组分析显示,年龄可能影响NLR与BD之间的关系。结论NLR值在BD中升高,尤其是在BDM中。然而,BDD和HC之间的差异没有统计学意义。NLR可能是识别和评估双相障碍的有效生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The European journal of psychiatry is a quarterly publication founded in 1986 and directed by Professor Seva until his death in 2004. It was originally intended to report “the scientific activity of European psychiatrists” and “to bring about a greater degree of communication” among them. However, “since scientific knowledge has no geographical or cultural boundaries, is open to contributions from all over the world”. These principles are maintained in the new stage of the journal, now expanded with the help of an American editor.
期刊最新文献
Intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant depression: real-world effectiveness in electroconvulsive therapy non-responders Translating early detection into prevention: Challenges and opportunities Sex differences in the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Mixed-methods analysis of formulations in functional neurological disorder Two exploratory studies to investigate the role of self and emotional dysregulation in borderline personality disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1