Functional differences in gaze based on roles in collision avoidance between wheelchair-type personal mobility vehicles

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.016
Yuki Ninomiya , Shota Matsubayashi , Kazuhisa Miwa , Hitoshi Terai , Naoki Akai , Daisuke Deguchi , Hiroshi Murase
{"title":"Functional differences in gaze based on roles in collision avoidance between wheelchair-type personal mobility vehicles","authors":"Yuki Ninomiya ,&nbsp;Shota Matsubayashi ,&nbsp;Kazuhisa Miwa ,&nbsp;Hitoshi Terai ,&nbsp;Naoki Akai ,&nbsp;Daisuke Deguchi ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Murase","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recently, the development of personal mobility vehicles (PMVs) has expanded shared spaces where pedestrians and different forms of mobility interact. In these shared spaces, traffic participants must interact with PMVs using strategies different from those used when interacting with pedestrians. This study aimed to elucidate the role-based differences in the function of gaze toward the partner in collision avoidance between PMVs. The experiment measured gaze, positional information, and understanding of the partner's intentions as two wheelchair-type PMVs passed each other and avoided collision. The results showed that the function of gaze varies based on roles in collision avoidance. First, we observed that the leader, who passes through the collision point first, gazes toward their partner to demand coordination behavior, while the follower, who passes through the collision point later, gazes at their partner to prompt coordination behavior and adjust their own behavior. Second, our results showed that only the follower's gaze improves the ratings of understanding and conveying the partner's intentions. These findings provide evidence that gaze is a critical source of information in collision avoidance between two PMVs, and its utilization varies depending on the role.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 15-27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825001081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, the development of personal mobility vehicles (PMVs) has expanded shared spaces where pedestrians and different forms of mobility interact. In these shared spaces, traffic participants must interact with PMVs using strategies different from those used when interacting with pedestrians. This study aimed to elucidate the role-based differences in the function of gaze toward the partner in collision avoidance between PMVs. The experiment measured gaze, positional information, and understanding of the partner's intentions as two wheelchair-type PMVs passed each other and avoided collision. The results showed that the function of gaze varies based on roles in collision avoidance. First, we observed that the leader, who passes through the collision point first, gazes toward their partner to demand coordination behavior, while the follower, who passes through the collision point later, gazes at their partner to prompt coordination behavior and adjust their own behavior. Second, our results showed that only the follower's gaze improves the ratings of understanding and conveying the partner's intentions. These findings provide evidence that gaze is a critical source of information in collision avoidance between two PMVs, and its utilization varies depending on the role.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于轮椅型个人机动车辆避碰角色的凝视功能差异
近年来,个人机动车辆(pmv)的发展扩大了行人和不同形式的机动互动的共享空间。在这些共享空间中,交通参与者必须使用不同于与行人互动时使用的策略与pmv互动。本研究的目的是阐明注视对象在避碰过程中的角色差异。该实验测量了两辆轮椅式pmv在彼此擦肩而过并避免碰撞时的凝视、位置信息和对伴侣意图的理解。结果表明,注视在避碰中的作用不同,其功能也不同。首先,我们观察到,首先通过碰撞点的领导者注视同伴,要求协调行为;随后通过碰撞点的追随者注视同伴,提示协调行为,调整自己的行为。其次,我们的研究结果表明,只有追随者的注视才能提高理解和传达同伴意图的评分。这些发现提供了证据,证明凝视是两个pmv之间避免碰撞的关键信息来源,其利用取决于角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Research on the influencing factors of human Drivers' Trust in fully autonomous vehicles A systematic review of gaming effects on driving related skills Medical cannabis and driving in Australia: Results from the cannabis as medicine survey 2022–2023 (CAMS-22) When driving becomes enjoyable: the role of hedonic motivation and interaction quality in the adoption of autonomous vehicles Exploring user heterogeneity in autonomous vehicle acceptance: A moderated mediation model based on extended TAM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1