Dietary risk assessment of field-incurred residues of cyantraniliprole & dimethoate on Rabi cabbage, Brassica oleraceae var. capitata in semi-arid region of Haryana (India)

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s10661-025-13968-w
Puneet Ranga, Surender Singh Yadav, Sushil Ahlawat, Sunita Yadav, Krishna Rolania
{"title":"Dietary risk assessment of field-incurred residues of cyantraniliprole & dimethoate on Rabi cabbage, Brassica oleraceae var. capitata in semi-arid region of Haryana (India)","authors":"Puneet Ranga,&nbsp;Surender Singh Yadav,&nbsp;Sushil Ahlawat,&nbsp;Sunita Yadav,&nbsp;Krishna Rolania","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-13968-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Field experiment was conducted to study the persistence behaviour of two effective insecticides (cyantraniliprole &amp; dimethoate) against <i>B. brassicae</i> on cabbage at single dose and double the recommended dosage. The residues of cyantraniliprole and dimethoate were estimated by High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Gas chromatography (GC), respectively. The half-life of cyantraniliprole at single and double dose was found to be 1.83 and 1.53 days, respectively. Similarly, the half-life of dimethoate was found to be 2.47 and 2.66 days, at single and double dose, respectively. The residues at terminal harvest for both the insecticides at both the application levels were found to be below the Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) value i.e., 2 parts per million (ppm) for both cyantraniliprole and dimethoate specified by the regulatory authority i.e., The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). The risk quotient (RQ) was found to be &lt; 1 even after 2 h of spray for both insecticides at both the doses indicating no possible risk to consumers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-13968-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted to study the persistence behaviour of two effective insecticides (cyantraniliprole & dimethoate) against B. brassicae on cabbage at single dose and double the recommended dosage. The residues of cyantraniliprole and dimethoate were estimated by High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Gas chromatography (GC), respectively. The half-life of cyantraniliprole at single and double dose was found to be 1.83 and 1.53 days, respectively. Similarly, the half-life of dimethoate was found to be 2.47 and 2.66 days, at single and double dose, respectively. The residues at terminal harvest for both the insecticides at both the application levels were found to be below the Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) value i.e., 2 parts per million (ppm) for both cyantraniliprole and dimethoate specified by the regulatory authority i.e., The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). The risk quotient (RQ) was found to be < 1 even after 2 h of spray for both insecticides at both the doses indicating no possible risk to consumers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度哈里亚纳邦半干旱地区拉比甘蓝(Brassica oleraceae var. capitata)上氰虫酰胺和乐果田间残留的膳食风险评估
通过田间试验研究了两种有效杀虫剂(氰虫腈和安培;以单剂量和两倍推荐剂量杀灭白菜上的芸苔菌。采用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)和气相色谱法(GC)分别测定了氰硝酰胺和乐果的残留量。单次给药和双次给药的半衰期分别为1.83天和1.53天。同样,在单剂量和双剂量下,乐果的半衰期分别为2.47天和2.66天。在两种施用水平下,两种杀虫剂的最终收获残留量均低于监管机构(即印度食品安全和标准局(FSSAI))规定的最高残留限量(MRL)值,即氰虫腈和乐果的百万分之2 (ppm)。两种剂量的杀虫剂喷洒2小时后,风险商(RQ)仍为1,表明对消费者没有可能的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of anthropogenic transformation of urban soils in Rostov-on-Don based on multivariate analysis of chemical and physical properties Effects of vertical vegetation layering and canopy closure on microclimate in plant based habitat patches Quantifying key drivers of atmospheric methane across Pakistan using a machine learning approach Climate change impacts on future habitat suitability of the endangered Persian leopard (Panthera pardus saxicolor) in Southern Iran Diversity and structure of riparian forests in an industrial and urban hub of the Amazon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1