Systematic Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Facial Rejuvenation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004267
Nancy Qin, Makayla Kochheiser, Izzet Akosman, David Dugue, Alex Raghunandan, Chetan Pavuluri, Carson Gundlach, Anna M Vaeth, Lucy Wei, Benjamin R Wesorick, David M Otterburn
{"title":"Systematic Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Facial Rejuvenation.","authors":"Nancy Qin, Makayla Kochheiser, Izzet Akosman, David Dugue, Alex Raghunandan, Chetan Pavuluri, Carson Gundlach, Anna M Vaeth, Lucy Wei, Benjamin R Wesorick, David M Otterburn","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) are promising treatments for facial rejuvenation, leveraging growth factors to stimulate natural tissue repair and regeneration. Despite their growing popularity, their effectiveness remains controversial, with studies yielding mixed results. This systematic review evaluates the current evidence on PRP/PRF therapies and their effect on the following 6 key parameters of facial aging: wrinkles, texture, dyschromia, elasticity, skin thickness, and hydration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and case series published after 2010. Eligible studies included more than 5 patients, evaluated PRP or PRF as monotherapy, and addressed at least 1 of the 6 listed parameters of facial aging. Articles were screened by 2 independent investigators and scored for quality of evidence using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine hierarchy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty articles, comprising 514 patients, met inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies compared PRP/PRF to a control or baseline, while 4 compared them to alternative treatments. Wrinkles and fine lines (n = 16) were the most frequently studied parameters, followed by dyschromia (n = 12), texture (n = 11), elasticity (n = 6), skin thickness (n = 5), and hydration (n = 4). Significant improvements following PRP/PRF treatment were reported in 80% of studies on skin thickness, 75% on elasticity, 40% on wrinkles, 33% on texture, 17% on dyschromia, and 0% on hydration. Skin dyschromia had the highest proportion of studies reporting mixed findings (41.7%), whereas skin hydration had the highest proportion of studies reporting no improvement (67%). Additionally, all studies evaluating patient satisfaction reported significant improvements from pretreatment to posttreatment. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review identified skin thickness and elasticity as the facial aging parameters with the strongest evidence of improvement following PRP/PRF treatment, while skin hydration showed the weakest.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 4S Suppl 2","pages":"S376-S389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) are promising treatments for facial rejuvenation, leveraging growth factors to stimulate natural tissue repair and regeneration. Despite their growing popularity, their effectiveness remains controversial, with studies yielding mixed results. This systematic review evaluates the current evidence on PRP/PRF therapies and their effect on the following 6 key parameters of facial aging: wrinkles, texture, dyschromia, elasticity, skin thickness, and hydration.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and case series published after 2010. Eligible studies included more than 5 patients, evaluated PRP or PRF as monotherapy, and addressed at least 1 of the 6 listed parameters of facial aging. Articles were screened by 2 independent investigators and scored for quality of evidence using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine hierarchy.

Results: Twenty articles, comprising 514 patients, met inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies compared PRP/PRF to a control or baseline, while 4 compared them to alternative treatments. Wrinkles and fine lines (n = 16) were the most frequently studied parameters, followed by dyschromia (n = 12), texture (n = 11), elasticity (n = 6), skin thickness (n = 5), and hydration (n = 4). Significant improvements following PRP/PRF treatment were reported in 80% of studies on skin thickness, 75% on elasticity, 40% on wrinkles, 33% on texture, 17% on dyschromia, and 0% on hydration. Skin dyschromia had the highest proportion of studies reporting mixed findings (41.7%), whereas skin hydration had the highest proportion of studies reporting no improvement (67%). Additionally, all studies evaluating patient satisfaction reported significant improvements from pretreatment to posttreatment. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the included studies.

Conclusions: This systematic review identified skin thickness and elasticity as the facial aging parameters with the strongest evidence of improvement following PRP/PRF treatment, while skin hydration showed the weakest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富血小板血浆和富血小板纤维蛋白在面部年轻化中的系统评价。
背景:富血小板血浆(PRP)和富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF富血小板血浆(PRP)和富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)利用生长因子刺激天然组织修复和再生,是很有前景的面部年轻化治疗方法。尽管它们越来越受欢迎,但其有效性仍存在争议,研究结果不一。本系统性综述评估了目前有关 PRP/PRF 疗法的证据及其对以下 6 个面部衰老关键参数的影响:皱纹、纹理、色素沉着、弹性、皮肤厚度和水合作用:在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中对 2010 年以后发表的对照试验、前瞻性队列研究和系列病例进行了全面的文献检索。符合条件的研究包括 5 名以上的患者,对 PRP 或 PRF 作为单一疗法进行了评估,并至少涉及了所列 6 项面部衰老参数中的一项。文章由两名独立研究人员进行筛选,并采用牛津循证医学中心的分级标准对证据质量进行评分:共有 20 篇文章符合纳入标准,其中包括 514 名患者。其中 16 项研究将 PRP/PRF 与对照组或基线进行了比较,4 项研究将 PRP/PRF 与其他治疗方法进行了比较。皱纹和细纹(16 例)是最常见的研究参数,其次是色素沉着(12 例)、肤质(11 例)、弹性(6 例)、皮肤厚度(5 例)和水合作用(4 例)。80%的研究报告称 PRP/PRF 治疗后皮肤厚度有明显改善,75%的研究报告称皮肤弹性有明显改善,40%的研究报告称皮肤皱纹有明显改善,33%的研究报告称皮肤纹理有明显改善,17%的研究报告称皮肤色素沉着有明显改善,0%的研究报告称皮肤水合作用有明显改善。报告皮肤色泽不良的研究比例最高(41.7%),而报告皮肤水合无改善的研究比例最高(67%)。此外,所有对患者满意度进行评估的研究都报告称,从治疗前到治疗后,患者的满意度都有显著提高。所有纳入的研究均未报告严重不良事件:本系统综述发现,皮肤厚度和弹性是 PRP/PRF 治疗后改善效果最强的面部衰老参数,而皮肤水合作用则最弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Interdigitating Dendritic Cell Sarcoma: A Rare Diagnostic Challenge. Out of the Laboratory and Into the Clinic: Out-of-Domain Validation of Machine Learning Models for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction Detection. Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: Reproducibility, Accessibility, and Durability. Is Primary Closure Safe and Effective for Sacral Pressure Ulcers? Single-Surgeon Experience With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in a Medical Center and a Regional Hospital. Capsule Preservation in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Prior Breast Augmentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1