Induction of labour in twin pregnancies. A prospective cohort study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Danish medical journal Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.61409/A01240010
Erling E Andreasen, Elisabeth E Graae, Sören Möller, Niels Uldbjerg, Mohammed Rohi Khalil
{"title":"Induction of labour in twin pregnancies. A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Erling E Andreasen, Elisabeth E Graae, Sören Möller, Niels Uldbjerg, Mohammed Rohi Khalil","doi":"10.61409/A01240010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In dichorionic twin pregnancies, the Danish national guidelines recommend induction of labour (IOL) at 38 weeks of gestation. This recommendation is rooted in the heightened risks of caesarean section and perinatal death associated with later gestational ages. Additionally, this procedure demonstrates a rate of successful vaginal delivery well above 60%. However, documentation remains inadequate regarding potential variances in outcomes between induction methods such as amniotomy, prostaglandins and balloon catheter. Therefore, we aimed to address this knowledge gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre cohort study encompassing 921 twin pregnancies between 2007 and 2019 at Lillebaelt University Hospital, Kolding, Denmark. The research database was updated prospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maternal mortality was zero. Perinatal mortality was 100% between weeks 22 and 24, gradually declining to 0% beyond 34 weeks. The overall frequency of caesarean section (planned and emergency) was 35%. Among those who underwent IOL, the rates of emergency caesarean section were 28% (32/114) for amniotomy, 41% (36/87) for prostaglandin and 53% (8/15) for balloon methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The notably high rates of caesarean section associated with IOL by prostaglandin or balloon catheter in twin pregnancies warrant consideration when planning IOL.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"71 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A01240010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In dichorionic twin pregnancies, the Danish national guidelines recommend induction of labour (IOL) at 38 weeks of gestation. This recommendation is rooted in the heightened risks of caesarean section and perinatal death associated with later gestational ages. Additionally, this procedure demonstrates a rate of successful vaginal delivery well above 60%. However, documentation remains inadequate regarding potential variances in outcomes between induction methods such as amniotomy, prostaglandins and balloon catheter. Therefore, we aimed to address this knowledge gap.

Methods: This was a single-centre cohort study encompassing 921 twin pregnancies between 2007 and 2019 at Lillebaelt University Hospital, Kolding, Denmark. The research database was updated prospectively.

Results: Maternal mortality was zero. Perinatal mortality was 100% between weeks 22 and 24, gradually declining to 0% beyond 34 weeks. The overall frequency of caesarean section (planned and emergency) was 35%. Among those who underwent IOL, the rates of emergency caesarean section were 28% (32/114) for amniotomy, 41% (36/87) for prostaglandin and 53% (8/15) for balloon methods.

Conclusions: The notably high rates of caesarean section associated with IOL by prostaglandin or balloon catheter in twin pregnancies warrant consideration when planning IOL.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: Not relevant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双胎妊娠引产。一项前瞻性队列研究。
引言对于二绒毛膜双胎妊娠,丹麦国家指南建议在妊娠 38 周时进行引产(IOL)。这一建议的依据是,妊娠年龄越大,剖腹产和围产期死亡的风险越高。此外,这种方法的阴道分娩成功率远高于 60%。然而,关于羊膜切开术、前列腺素和球囊导管等引产方法的潜在结果差异的文献资料仍然不足。因此,我们旨在填补这一知识空白:这是一项单中心队列研究,涵盖 2007 年至 2019 年期间丹麦科尔丁利勒贝尔特大学医院的 921 例双胎妊娠。研究数据库进行了前瞻性更新:结果:产妇死亡率为零。围产期死亡率在第22至24周为100%,34周后逐渐降至0%。剖腹产(计划和紧急)的总频率为 35%。在接受人工晶体植入术的产妇中,羊膜切开术的紧急剖腹产率为28%(32/114),前列腺素法为41%(36/87),球囊法为53%(8/15):结论:在双胎妊娠中,使用前列腺素或球囊导管进行人工晶体植入术的剖腹产率明显较高,因此在计划人工晶体植入术时应加以考虑:无:试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
期刊最新文献
Colorectal cancer in Greenland. Danish cross-cultural adaptation of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire. Clinical work perception and mental health in Danish resident doctors. Acute haemodynamic and diuretic effects of intravenous furosemide in acute heart failure. Clinical Frailty Scale scores of older patients admitted to an emergency department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1