Comparison of the digestive tolerance of an oligomeric versus a polymeric oral nutritional supplement in people with anorexia nervosa. A randomised crossover clinical trial

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS European Journal of Clinical Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1038/s41430-025-01608-y
Ignacio Ruiz García, Nuria Porras Pérez, Francisca García Torres, Lourdes Olivas Delgado, Francisco José Sánchez Torralvo, Margarita Pascual López, Carmen Fernández Marzalo, Gabriel Olveira
{"title":"Comparison of the digestive tolerance of an oligomeric versus a polymeric oral nutritional supplement in people with anorexia nervosa. A randomised crossover clinical trial","authors":"Ignacio Ruiz García, Nuria Porras Pérez, Francisca García Torres, Lourdes Olivas Delgado, Francisco José Sánchez Torralvo, Margarita Pascual López, Carmen Fernández Marzalo, Gabriel Olveira","doi":"10.1038/s41430-025-01608-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most people with anorexia nervosa (pAN) have digestive symptoms, which affect tolerance to nutritional treatment. Oligomeric oral nutritional supplements may be better absorbed and tolerated than polymeric ones. Our aim was to compare an oligomeric versus a polymeric nutritional supplement in pAN in terms of worsening of digestive symptoms after ingestion (primary objective) and in terms of sensory perception of the supplement (secondary objective). A randomised, crossover, double-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted. Inclusion criteria were: male or female aged 12–50 years with anorexia nervosa treated at the Eating Disorders Unit of the Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain. Participants were randomised to first receive one container of the oligomeric or polymeric supplement. A digestive symptom questionnaire was administered, which they completed again after taking the supplement, together with a questionnaire for sensory evaluation of the supplement. One week later, they received a container of the other type of supplement, and the process was repeated. Analysis was performed on a per protocol basis. Ten people were randomised to the oligomeric-polymeric sequence and 12 to the polymeric-oligomeric sequence, of whom 9 and 11, respectively, finally received the intervention and were analysed. There were no statistically significant differences in digestive symptoms between the two supplements. The oligomeric one scored lower on taste and higher on acidity. The median (interquartile range) for oligomeric and polymeric were respectively: taste 6.5 (4), 8(3), p 0.03; acidity 0 (1), 0 (0), p 0.01. In pAN, there is no difference in the worsening of digestive symptoms after ingestion of oligomeric versus polymeric supplements. Polymerics are perceived as having better taste and less acidity. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT05184738.","PeriodicalId":11927,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"79 8","pages":"780-786"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-025-01608-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most people with anorexia nervosa (pAN) have digestive symptoms, which affect tolerance to nutritional treatment. Oligomeric oral nutritional supplements may be better absorbed and tolerated than polymeric ones. Our aim was to compare an oligomeric versus a polymeric nutritional supplement in pAN in terms of worsening of digestive symptoms after ingestion (primary objective) and in terms of sensory perception of the supplement (secondary objective). A randomised, crossover, double-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted. Inclusion criteria were: male or female aged 12–50 years with anorexia nervosa treated at the Eating Disorders Unit of the Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain. Participants were randomised to first receive one container of the oligomeric or polymeric supplement. A digestive symptom questionnaire was administered, which they completed again after taking the supplement, together with a questionnaire for sensory evaluation of the supplement. One week later, they received a container of the other type of supplement, and the process was repeated. Analysis was performed on a per protocol basis. Ten people were randomised to the oligomeric-polymeric sequence and 12 to the polymeric-oligomeric sequence, of whom 9 and 11, respectively, finally received the intervention and were analysed. There were no statistically significant differences in digestive symptoms between the two supplements. The oligomeric one scored lower on taste and higher on acidity. The median (interquartile range) for oligomeric and polymeric were respectively: taste 6.5 (4), 8(3), p 0.03; acidity 0 (1), 0 (0), p 0.01. In pAN, there is no difference in the worsening of digestive symptoms after ingestion of oligomeric versus polymeric supplements. Polymerics are perceived as having better taste and less acidity. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT05184738.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经性厌食症患者对寡聚物与聚合物口服营养补充剂的消化耐受性比较。一项随机交叉临床试验。
背景:大多数神经性厌食症(pAN)患者有消化系统症状,影响对营养治疗的耐受性。低聚口服营养补充剂可能比聚合物的吸收和耐受性更好。我们的目的是比较pAN中寡聚物与聚合物营养补充剂在摄入后消化症状恶化(主要目标)和补充剂的感官知觉(次要目标)方面的差异。方法:采用随机、交叉、双盲、对照临床试验。纳入标准为:男性或女性,年龄12-50岁,在西班牙Málaga地区大学医院饮食失调科接受神经性厌食症治疗。参与者被随机分配,首先接受一个容器的低聚物或聚合物补充剂。他们在服用补充剂后再次填写了一份消化症状问卷,并填写了一份补充剂感官评估问卷。一周后,他们收到另一种补充剂的容器,重复这个过程。分析在每个方案的基础上进行。结果:10人随机分到低聚-聚合序列,12人随机分到低聚-聚合序列,其中分别有9人和11人最终接受干预并进行分析。两种补充剂在消化症状方面没有统计学上的显著差异。低聚的那一种在味道上得分较低,在酸度上得分较高。低聚物和聚合物的中位数(四分位数范围)分别为:味道6.5 (4),8(3),p 0.03;酸度0 (1),0 (0),p 0.01。结论:在pAN中,摄入低聚物与聚合物补充剂后消化系统症状的恶化没有差异。聚合物被认为口感更好,酸度更低。试验注册:该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号NCT05184738。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (EJCN) is an international, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of human and clinical nutrition. The journal welcomes original research, reviews, case reports and brief communications based on clinical, metabolic and epidemiological studies that describe methodologies, mechanisms, associations and benefits of nutritional interventions for clinical disease and health promotion. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: Nutrition and Health (including climate and ecological aspects) Metabolism & Metabolomics Genomics and personalized strategies in nutrition Nutrition during the early life cycle Health issues and nutrition in the elderly Phenotyping in clinical nutrition Nutrition in acute and chronic diseases The double burden of ''malnutrition'': Under-nutrition and Obesity Prevention of Non Communicable Diseases (NCD)
期刊最新文献
Alterations in gut microbiota composition in children with methylmalonic acidemia, propionic acidemia, and maple syrup urine disease. Dietary inflammatory index and objective disease activity in IBD: no association found. Correction: Quantifying vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia. Association between trajectories of body mass index and changes in fat free mass index and fat mass index in a cohort of European children. The IDEFICS/I.Family studies. Role of olive oil in weight gain: contrasting the animal and human findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1