Pectoral nerve block and pecto-intercostal fascial block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_734_24
Adarsh M Sheshagiri, Ajeet Kumar, Chandni Sinha, Abhyuday Kumar, Poonam Kumari, Amarjeet Kumar, Chandan Jha
{"title":"Pectoral nerve block and pecto-intercostal fascial block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Adarsh M Sheshagiri, Ajeet Kumar, Chandni Sinha, Abhyuday Kumar, Poonam Kumari, Amarjeet Kumar, Chandan Jha","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_734_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is associated with persistent postoperative pain. Paravertebral block (PVB) is the gold standard for postoperative analgesia. A pecto-intercostal fascial plane (PIFB) block added to the pectoral nerve block (Pecs) may provide effective analgesia. This trial aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of Pecs-PIFB with PVB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients scheduled for MRM were randomly assigned to receive either Pecs-PIFB block with 30 mL for Pecs block and 15 mL for PIFB or PVB block with 20 mL (0.2% ropivacaine). Postoperatively, intravenous (IV) morphine was administered through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. The primary outcome was to compare the time to the first demand dose of rescue analgesic. The secondary outcomes were postoperative 24-hour opioid consumption, pain scores (30 mins and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h), patient satisfaction score (24 h), and block-related complications. The unpaired <i>t</i>-test compared quantitative normally distributed data, while the Mann-Whitney U test compared quantitative discrete data. A <i>P</i> value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the Group Pecs-PIFB had an increased median time to first demand dose: 440 [interquartile range (IQR): 360-540] versus 340 (IQR: 180-360) minutes (<i>P</i> = 0.019) and lower median 24-h postoperative morphine consumption: 4 (3-6) versus 6 (4-8) mg (<i>P</i> = 0.020). Patients in the Group Pecs-PIFB had better pain scores at 30 minutes and 1 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to thoracic PVB, the combination of Pecs and PIFB block prolonged the duration of analgesia and decreased postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing MRM surgeries. There was no statistical increase in complications in patients receiving this block.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 3","pages":"302-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_734_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is associated with persistent postoperative pain. Paravertebral block (PVB) is the gold standard for postoperative analgesia. A pecto-intercostal fascial plane (PIFB) block added to the pectoral nerve block (Pecs) may provide effective analgesia. This trial aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of Pecs-PIFB with PVB.

Methods: Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients scheduled for MRM were randomly assigned to receive either Pecs-PIFB block with 30 mL for Pecs block and 15 mL for PIFB or PVB block with 20 mL (0.2% ropivacaine). Postoperatively, intravenous (IV) morphine was administered through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. The primary outcome was to compare the time to the first demand dose of rescue analgesic. The secondary outcomes were postoperative 24-hour opioid consumption, pain scores (30 mins and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h), patient satisfaction score (24 h), and block-related complications. The unpaired t-test compared quantitative normally distributed data, while the Mann-Whitney U test compared quantitative discrete data. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results: Patients in the Group Pecs-PIFB had an increased median time to first demand dose: 440 [interquartile range (IQR): 360-540] versus 340 (IQR: 180-360) minutes (P = 0.019) and lower median 24-h postoperative morphine consumption: 4 (3-6) versus 6 (4-8) mg (P = 0.020). Patients in the Group Pecs-PIFB had better pain scores at 30 minutes and 1 h.

Conclusion: Compared to thoracic PVB, the combination of Pecs and PIFB block prolonged the duration of analgesia and decreased postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing MRM surgeries. There was no statistical increase in complications in patients receiving this block.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良乳房根治术术后镇痛的胸神经阻滞和胸肋间筋膜阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞:一项随机对照试验。
背景和目的:改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)与术后持续疼痛相关。椎旁阻滞(PVB)是术后镇痛的金标准。胸神经阻滞(Pecs)与胸肋间筋膜平面(PIFB)阻滞可以提供有效的镇痛效果。本试验旨在比较Pecs-PIFB与PVB的镇痛效果。方法:50例美国麻醉学会(ASA) I/II期MRM患者随机分配接受Pecs-PIFB阻滞治疗(Pecs阻滞30 mL, PIFB阻滞15 mL)或PVB阻滞20 mL(0.2%罗哌卡因)。术后,通过患者自控镇痛(PCA)泵静脉注射吗啡。主要结局是比较时间和第一次救援镇痛药的需求剂量。次要结果是术后24小时阿片类药物消耗、疼痛评分(30分钟和1,2,4,6,12和24小时)、患者满意度评分(24小时)和阻滞相关并发症。非配对t检验比较定量正态分布数据,Mann-Whitney U检验比较定量离散数据。P值< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:Pecs-PIFB组患者首次需要吗啡的中位时间增加:440[四分位数间距(IQR): 360-540] vs 340 (IQR: 180-360)分钟(P = 0.019),术后24小时吗啡消耗中位时间减少:4 (3-6)vs 6 (4-8) mg (P = 0.020)。结论:与胸椎PVB相比,Pecs和PIFB联合阻滞延长了MRM手术患者的镇痛时间,减少了术后阿片类药物的消耗。在接受这种阻滞的患者中,并发症没有统计学上的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Changing winds, a silent return, and promises to keep: The journey resumes in an artificial intelligence era. Comment on: "Impact of external oblique intercostal plane block on postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Competence, commitment, and compassion: The guiding principles. Assessing open access publishing in anaesthesia. Correlation of mechanical power and outcome in critically ill patients in Indian population: A prospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1