Characterizing the clinical and economic burden of COVID-19 among individuals with immunocompromising conditions in Ontario, Canada - a matched, population-based observational study.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2482372
Christina Qian, Karissa M Johnston, Maria Tinajero, M Lauren Voss, Austin Nam, Mackenzie A Hamilton
{"title":"Characterizing the clinical and economic burden of COVID-19 among individuals with immunocompromising conditions in Ontario, Canada - a matched, population-based observational study.","authors":"Christina Qian, Karissa M Johnston, Maria Tinajero, M Lauren Voss, Austin Nam, Mackenzie A Hamilton","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2482372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>COVID-19 continues to be associated with substantial burden among immunocompromised patients (IC). This study aimed to describe and compare outcomes during and following COVID-19 hospitalizations among IC and non-IC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (January 2020-March 2023) were identified in Ontario health administrative claims databases. All eligible IC (≥1 of solid organ or stem cell transplant; hematological malignancy; rheumatoid arthritis; multiple sclerosis; or primary immunodeficiency) were matched (1:4) to eligible non-IC. Clinical, resource, and costburden were assessed during and post-hospitalization. Multivariate regression models were used to estimate relative risks (RRi), rates (RRa), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for neighborhood deprivation, long-term care residency, baseline comorbidities, and COVID-19 vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>9,283 IC hospitalized (mean age 68.7 years; 52.1% female) were matched to 37,127 non-IC. During index hospitalization, IC had greater risks of intensive care unit admission (RRi = 1.06 [1.01-1.12]), ventilation (RRi = 1.27 [1.19-1.36]), and all-cause mortality (RRi = 1.34 [1.27-1.41]) compared to non-IC. Within 30-days post-discharge, IC had greater rates of all-cause readmission (RRa = 1.33 [1.26-1.40]), emergency departments admission (RRa = 1.13 [1.08-1.18]), home oxygen use (RRi = 1.35 [1.15-1.58]), and COVID-19-related rehabilitation (RRa = 1.52 [1.22-1.89]), resulting in 21% (16%-25%) and 51% (45%-58%) greater costs in hospital and post-discharge, respectively. All-cause mortality remained approximately 5% higher for IC vs. non-IC at 30- and 60-days post-discharge (<i>p</i> < .001). Resource use remained elevated among IC with 57% (50%-64%) greater costs within 180 days post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Unmeasured confounding remains; hospital prescription data were not available such that treatments for COVID-19 were not captured. Attribution of post-discharge resource use and costs to COVID-19 was subject to greater uncertainty further from the index hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IC experienced more severe COVID-19 hospitalization outcomes compared to non-IC. COVID-mitigating policies and prophylactic treatments are needed to protect immunocompromised populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"479-493"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2482372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: COVID-19 continues to be associated with substantial burden among immunocompromised patients (IC). This study aimed to describe and compare outcomes during and following COVID-19 hospitalizations among IC and non-IC patients.

Methods: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (January 2020-March 2023) were identified in Ontario health administrative claims databases. All eligible IC (≥1 of solid organ or stem cell transplant; hematological malignancy; rheumatoid arthritis; multiple sclerosis; or primary immunodeficiency) were matched (1:4) to eligible non-IC. Clinical, resource, and costburden were assessed during and post-hospitalization. Multivariate regression models were used to estimate relative risks (RRi), rates (RRa), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for neighborhood deprivation, long-term care residency, baseline comorbidities, and COVID-19 vaccination status.

Results: 9,283 IC hospitalized (mean age 68.7 years; 52.1% female) were matched to 37,127 non-IC. During index hospitalization, IC had greater risks of intensive care unit admission (RRi = 1.06 [1.01-1.12]), ventilation (RRi = 1.27 [1.19-1.36]), and all-cause mortality (RRi = 1.34 [1.27-1.41]) compared to non-IC. Within 30-days post-discharge, IC had greater rates of all-cause readmission (RRa = 1.33 [1.26-1.40]), emergency departments admission (RRa = 1.13 [1.08-1.18]), home oxygen use (RRi = 1.35 [1.15-1.58]), and COVID-19-related rehabilitation (RRa = 1.52 [1.22-1.89]), resulting in 21% (16%-25%) and 51% (45%-58%) greater costs in hospital and post-discharge, respectively. All-cause mortality remained approximately 5% higher for IC vs. non-IC at 30- and 60-days post-discharge (p < .001). Resource use remained elevated among IC with 57% (50%-64%) greater costs within 180 days post-discharge.

Limitations: Unmeasured confounding remains; hospital prescription data were not available such that treatments for COVID-19 were not captured. Attribution of post-discharge resource use and costs to COVID-19 was subject to greater uncertainty further from the index hospitalization.

Conclusion: IC experienced more severe COVID-19 hospitalization outcomes compared to non-IC. COVID-mitigating policies and prophylactic treatments are needed to protect immunocompromised populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大安大略省免疫力低下人群中 COVID-19 的临床和经济负担特征--一项基于人群的匹配观察研究。
目的:尽管疫苗接种率很高,但COVID-19仍然与免疫功能低下患者(IC)的沉重负担相关。本研究旨在描述和比较免疫功能低下的IC患者和非IC患者(非IC)在COVID-19住院期间和之后的结果。方法:在安大略省卫生行政索赔数据库中识别2019冠状病毒病住院患者(2020年1月- 2023年3月)。所有符合IC(≥1)的实体器官或干细胞移植;血液恶性肿瘤;类风湿性关节炎;多发性硬化;或原发性免疫缺陷)与符合条件的非免疫缺陷配对(1:4)。在住院期间和出院后评估临床负担、医疗资源使用和费用。使用多变量回归模型来估计相对危险度(RRi)、发病率(RRa)和相应的95%置信区间(ci),并对社区剥夺、长期护理住院、基线合并症和COVID-19疫苗接种状况进行调整。结果:9283例IC住院合并COVID-19患者(平均年龄68.7岁;52.1%女性)与37127例非ic相匹配。在指数住院期间,IC患者入住重症监护病房(RRi = 1.06[1.01-1.12])、接受通气(RRi = 1.27[1.19-1.36])和全因死亡率(RRi = 1.34[1.27-1.41])的风险高于非IC患者。出院后30天内,IC患者的全因再入院率(RRa = 1.33[1.26-1.40])、急诊科入院率(RRa = 1.13[1.08-1.18])、家庭吸氧率(RRi = 1.35[1.15-1.58])和与covid -19相关的康复率(RRa = 1.52[1.22-1.89])较高,导致住院费用和出院后费用分别高出21%(16%-25%)和51%(45%-58%)。在出院后30天和60天,IC的全因死亡率仍比非IC高约5% (p限制:未测量的混杂因素;由于缺乏院内处方数据,未调整COVID-19治疗方法的使用。出院后资源使用和费用归因于COVID-19住院治疗,从指数住院治疗来看,存在更大的不确定性。结论:与非IC相比,IC在医院和出院后经历了更严重的COVID-19结局。需要采取缓解covid - 19的政策和预防性治疗,以继续保护免疫功能低下人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin as an add-on to the standard of care for chronic kidney disease management in the Philippines. Annual vaccination with BNT162b2 in Germany can avoid substantial clinical and economic burden of COVID-19 disease. A real-world study evaluating drug tolerability and health care resource use with acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Health-economic impact of implementing continuous vital sign monitoring in post-surgical patients in five European countries. A five-year cost-consequence analysis of extended-use etonogestrel implant versus other contraceptives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1