The impact of neuroendoscopic drainage in intraventricular hemorrhage: an updated meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03471-8
Frederico de Lima Gibbon, Rafaela Jucá Lindner, Matheus Rech, Guilherme Gago, Lucca Biolcati Palavani, Gabriel Semione, Felipe Salvagni Pereira, Antônio Delacy Martini Vial, Feres Chaddad-Neto
{"title":"The impact of neuroendoscopic drainage in intraventricular hemorrhage: an updated meta-analysis.","authors":"Frederico de Lima Gibbon, Rafaela Jucá Lindner, Matheus Rech, Guilherme Gago, Lucca Biolcati Palavani, Gabriel Semione, Felipe Salvagni Pereira, Antônio Delacy Martini Vial, Feres Chaddad-Neto","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03471-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a mainstay for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) treatment, improving ventricular clearance and reducing mortality but with suboptimal complications and morbidity. Meanwhile, several studies have shown that neuroendoscopic drainage (NED) provides superior results and is a promising therapy. Thus, we aimed to compare NED and EVD in patients with IVH. A systematic literature review was conducted using Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases. The primary outcome was shunt dependency. Secondary outcomes were infection, length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, mortality, and functional outcome. Inclusion criteria: studies comparing NED and EVD with predefined outcomes. Exclusion criteria: age < five years. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 2024.04.1 + 748. Sensitivity analysis was performed with subgroup analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB-2. Of 234 potential articles, 17 met our criteria, involving 1043 patients, with 495 undergoing NED and 548 receiving only EVD. Patients who underwent NED had lower odds of shunt dependency (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.12,0.25; p < 0.001), infection (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.16,0.53; p < 0.001), and mortality at one month (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.20,0.96; p = 0.039) and six months (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16,0.58; p < 0.001), shorter hospital (MD -6.02; 95% CI -9.58,-2.45; p < 0.001) and ICU stay (MD -6.64; 95% CI -10.46,-2.83; p < 0.001), and better functional outcomes according to Glasgow Outcome Scale (MD -0.65; 95% CI -0.98,-0.32; p < 0.001) and modified Rankin Scale (MD -1.25; 95% CI -1.90,-0.60; p < 0.001) compared to patients who underwent EVD. To confirm the robustness of the results, we performed sensitivity analyses with subgroups of the RCT, which also showed significant superiority of NED over EVD. Our results suggest that NED has a positive impact on patients with IVH and may be a breakthrough intervention in this scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03471-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a mainstay for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) treatment, improving ventricular clearance and reducing mortality but with suboptimal complications and morbidity. Meanwhile, several studies have shown that neuroendoscopic drainage (NED) provides superior results and is a promising therapy. Thus, we aimed to compare NED and EVD in patients with IVH. A systematic literature review was conducted using Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases. The primary outcome was shunt dependency. Secondary outcomes were infection, length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, mortality, and functional outcome. Inclusion criteria: studies comparing NED and EVD with predefined outcomes. Exclusion criteria: age < five years. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 2024.04.1 + 748. Sensitivity analysis was performed with subgroup analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB-2. Of 234 potential articles, 17 met our criteria, involving 1043 patients, with 495 undergoing NED and 548 receiving only EVD. Patients who underwent NED had lower odds of shunt dependency (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.12,0.25; p < 0.001), infection (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.16,0.53; p < 0.001), and mortality at one month (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.20,0.96; p = 0.039) and six months (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16,0.58; p < 0.001), shorter hospital (MD -6.02; 95% CI -9.58,-2.45; p < 0.001) and ICU stay (MD -6.64; 95% CI -10.46,-2.83; p < 0.001), and better functional outcomes according to Glasgow Outcome Scale (MD -0.65; 95% CI -0.98,-0.32; p < 0.001) and modified Rankin Scale (MD -1.25; 95% CI -1.90,-0.60; p < 0.001) compared to patients who underwent EVD. To confirm the robustness of the results, we performed sensitivity analyses with subgroups of the RCT, which also showed significant superiority of NED over EVD. Our results suggest that NED has a positive impact on patients with IVH and may be a breakthrough intervention in this scenario.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经内镜引流术对脑室内出血的影响:最新荟萃分析。
脑室外引流术(EVD)是脑室内出血(IVH)治疗的主要方法,可改善脑室清除率,降低死亡率,但并发症和发病率不理想。同时,一些研究表明神经内镜引流术(NED)具有良好的效果,是一种很有前景的治疗方法。因此,我们旨在比较IVH患者的NED和EVD。使用Embase、PubMed和Cochrane数据库进行系统的文献综述。主要结局为分流依赖性。次要结局是感染、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间、死亡率和功能结局。纳入标准:比较NED和EVD与预定结局的研究。排除标准:年龄
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Microsurgical clipping versus endovascular therapy for distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: A meta-analysis of double-armed comparative studies. Prevalence of os odontoideum: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression with implications for vertebral artery and osseous anomalies. Comparison of two novel options for resuspension of inverted U-shaped nasopharyngeal flap following endonasal access to cranio-vertebral junction: Pilot cadaveric analysis and illustrative case report. Barriers to care in epilepsy surgery clinics in Latin America: a systematic review of social-economic impact. Brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) during pregnancy: An Italian survey and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1