Use of disposable painless silicone urethral catheter during urological surgery for male patients: a randomized controlled study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY World Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1007/s00345-025-05506-7
Hong-Wei Zhang, Teng Fan, Dan Shen, Zhi-Li Zhao, Hui-Fang Xi, Wei-Wei Wang, Xiu-Qin Yue, Li Li
{"title":"Use of disposable painless silicone urethral catheter during urological surgery for male patients: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Hong-Wei Zhang, Teng Fan, Dan Shen, Zhi-Li Zhao, Hui-Fang Xi, Wei-Wei Wang, Xiu-Qin Yue, Li Li","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05506-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefits of placing a disposable, painless silicone urethral catheter in male patients undergoing urological surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 246 male patients who were scheduled to undergo elective urological surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to the observation and control groups. Patients in the observation group received a disposable, painless silicone urethral catheter connected to an analgesic pump infusing 50 mL of 2% lidocaine at 2 mL/h. The control group received a standard silicone urethral catheter post-surgery. Pain scores, the incidence and severity of catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD), sedation scores at 0, 1, 6, 12, and 24 h post-surgery, satisfaction scores at 24 h post-surgery, and postoperative complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of CRBD among patients in the observation group at 1, 6, and 12 h post-surgery was significantly lower than in the control group (at 1 h: 15.25% vs. 28.23%, respectively; p = 0.021; at 6 h: 8.47% vs. 20.16%, respectively; p = 0.010; at 12 h: 4.24% vs. 12.90%, respectively; p = 0.017). The severity of CRBD was also significantly lower in the observation group at 0 and 1 h post-surgery (p = 0.012 and p = 0.026, respectively). Pain and sedation scores at 1, 6, and 12 h post-surgery were significantly lower among patients in the observation group compared to those in the control group. Although there were no significant differences in postoperative complications, patients in the observation group reported significantly higher satisfaction scores (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The placement of a disposable painless silicone urethral catheter in male patients during urological surgery was effective in reducing the incidence and severity of postoperative CRBD, relieving pain, and improving patient satisfaction without clinically significant adverse reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05506-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefits of placing a disposable, painless silicone urethral catheter in male patients undergoing urological surgery.

Methods: A total of 246 male patients who were scheduled to undergo elective urological surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to the observation and control groups. Patients in the observation group received a disposable, painless silicone urethral catheter connected to an analgesic pump infusing 50 mL of 2% lidocaine at 2 mL/h. The control group received a standard silicone urethral catheter post-surgery. Pain scores, the incidence and severity of catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD), sedation scores at 0, 1, 6, 12, and 24 h post-surgery, satisfaction scores at 24 h post-surgery, and postoperative complications were recorded.

Results: The incidence of CRBD among patients in the observation group at 1, 6, and 12 h post-surgery was significantly lower than in the control group (at 1 h: 15.25% vs. 28.23%, respectively; p = 0.021; at 6 h: 8.47% vs. 20.16%, respectively; p = 0.010; at 12 h: 4.24% vs. 12.90%, respectively; p = 0.017). The severity of CRBD was also significantly lower in the observation group at 0 and 1 h post-surgery (p = 0.012 and p = 0.026, respectively). Pain and sedation scores at 1, 6, and 12 h post-surgery were significantly lower among patients in the observation group compared to those in the control group. Although there were no significant differences in postoperative complications, patients in the observation group reported significantly higher satisfaction scores (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The placement of a disposable painless silicone urethral catheter in male patients during urological surgery was effective in reducing the incidence and severity of postoperative CRBD, relieving pain, and improving patient satisfaction without clinically significant adverse reactions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一次性无痛硅胶导尿管在男性泌尿外科手术中的应用:一项随机对照研究。
研究目的本研究旨在评估为接受泌尿外科手术的男性患者置入一次性无痛硅胶尿道导管的益处:共有 246 名男性患者计划在全身麻醉下接受择期泌尿外科手术,他们被随机分配到观察组和对照组。观察组患者接受一次性无痛硅胶尿道导管,该导管与镇痛泵相连,以 2 毫升/小时的速度注入 50 毫升 2% 利多卡因。对照组术后使用标准硅胶尿道导管。记录疼痛评分、导尿管相关膀胱不适(CRBD)的发生率和严重程度、术后 0、1、6、12 和 24 小时的镇静评分、术后 24 小时的满意度评分以及术后并发症:结果:观察组患者术后 1、6 和 12 h CRBD 发生率明显低于对照组(1 h:分别为 15.25% vs. 28.23%;P = 0.021;6 h:分别为 8.47% vs. 20.16%;P = 0.010;12 h:分别为 4.24% vs. 12.24%;P = 0.010):分别为 4.24% 对 12.90%;p = 0.017)。观察组在手术后 0 小时和 1 小时的 CRBD 严重程度也明显较低(分别为 p = 0.012 和 p = 0.026)。与对照组相比,观察组患者在术后 1、6 和 12 小时的疼痛和镇静评分明显较低。虽然在术后并发症方面没有明显差异,但观察组患者的满意度评分明显更高(P 结论:观察组患者的满意度评分明显高于对照组):在泌尿外科手术中为男性患者置入一次性无痛硅胶尿道导管能有效降低术后 CRBD 的发生率和严重程度、缓解疼痛并提高患者满意度,且无明显临床不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
期刊最新文献
Does size matter? Comparison of miniaturized (22 Fr) versus standard (26 Fr) instruments in pulsed thulium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate. Thermal injury and treatment efficiency during thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: insights from an in vivo porcine model. Real-world outcomes of bladder-sparing strategies for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter study. Prospective single-center study comparing RealPulse® Thulium:YAG and Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate. Nocturia: when the heart wakes you up at night.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1