Longitudinal associations of naturalistic psychedelic use with psychotic and manic symptoms.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1017/S0033291725000716
Otto Simonsson, Simon B Goldberg, Walter Osika, Cecilia U D Stenfors, Sankalp Chaturvedi, Caroline M Swords, Jayanth Narayanan, Peter S Hendricks
{"title":"Longitudinal associations of naturalistic psychedelic use with psychotic and manic symptoms.","authors":"Otto Simonsson, Simon B Goldberg, Walter Osika, Cecilia U D Stenfors, Sankalp Chaturvedi, Caroline M Swords, Jayanth Narayanan, Peter S Hendricks","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725000716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Findings from contemporary clinical trials suggest that psychedelics are generally safe and may be effective in the treatment of various psychiatric disorders. However, less is known about the risks associated with psychedelic use outside of medically supervised contexts, particularly in populations that are typically excluded from participation in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a preregistered longitudinal observational research design with a purposive sample of US residents between 18 and 50 years old (<i>N</i>=21,990), we investigated associations between self-reported naturalistic psychedelic use and psychotic and manic symptoms, with emphasis on those with psychiatric histories of schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The follow-up survey was completed by 12,345 participants (56% retention), with 505 participants reporting psychedelic use during the 2-month study period. In covariate-adjusted regression models, psychedelic use during the study period was associated with increases in the severity of psychotic and manic symptoms. However, such increases were only observed for those who reported psychedelic use in an illegal context. While increases in the severity of psychotic symptoms appeared to depend on the frequency of use and the intensity of challenging psychedelic experiences, increases in the severity of manic symptoms appeared to be moderated by a personal history of schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder and the subjective experience of insight during a psychedelic experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that naturalistic psychedelic use specifically in illegal contexts may lead to increases in the severity of psychotic and manic symptoms. Such increases may depend on the frequency of use, the acute subjective psychedelic experience, and psychiatric history.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e99"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725000716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Findings from contemporary clinical trials suggest that psychedelics are generally safe and may be effective in the treatment of various psychiatric disorders. However, less is known about the risks associated with psychedelic use outside of medically supervised contexts, particularly in populations that are typically excluded from participation in clinical trials.

Methods: Using a preregistered longitudinal observational research design with a purposive sample of US residents between 18 and 50 years old (N=21,990), we investigated associations between self-reported naturalistic psychedelic use and psychotic and manic symptoms, with emphasis on those with psychiatric histories of schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder.

Results: The follow-up survey was completed by 12,345 participants (56% retention), with 505 participants reporting psychedelic use during the 2-month study period. In covariate-adjusted regression models, psychedelic use during the study period was associated with increases in the severity of psychotic and manic symptoms. However, such increases were only observed for those who reported psychedelic use in an illegal context. While increases in the severity of psychotic symptoms appeared to depend on the frequency of use and the intensity of challenging psychedelic experiences, increases in the severity of manic symptoms appeared to be moderated by a personal history of schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder and the subjective experience of insight during a psychedelic experience.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that naturalistic psychedelic use specifically in illegal contexts may lead to increases in the severity of psychotic and manic symptoms. Such increases may depend on the frequency of use, the acute subjective psychedelic experience, and psychiatric history.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然致幻剂使用与精神病和躁狂症状的纵向关联。
背景:当代临床试验结果表明,致幻剂通常是安全的,并且可能对治疗各种精神疾病有效。然而,对于在医学监督范围之外使用致幻剂的相关风险知之甚少,特别是在通常被排除在临床试验之外的人群中。方法:采用预先登记的纵向观察研究设计,目的样本为18至50岁的美国居民(N= 21990),我们调查了自我报告的自然致幻剂使用与精神病和躁狂症状之间的关系,重点是那些有精神分裂症或双相I型精神病史的人。结果:随访调查有12345名参与者(保留率56%)完成,505名参与者报告在2个月的研究期间使用迷幻药。在协变量调整回归模型中,研究期间迷幻药的使用与精神病和躁狂症状严重程度的增加有关。然而,这种增加只在那些报告在非法情况下使用迷幻药的人身上观察到。虽然精神病症状严重程度的增加似乎取决于使用频率和具有挑战性的迷幻体验的强度,但躁狂症状严重程度的增加似乎被精神分裂症或双相I型障碍的个人病史和迷幻体验期间的主观顿悟体验所缓和。结论:研究结果表明,在非法环境下使用自然致幻剂可能导致精神病和躁狂症状的严重程度增加。这种增加可能取决于使用频率、急性主观迷幻体验和精神病史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Response to Kellner, Espinoza, Gligorovic, and Sartorius. Alarm bells or echoes of hope? A new perspective on the global youth mental health crisis - CORRIGENDUM. Perceived partner substance use, genetic predispositions, and their associations with problematic alcohol use, emotional well-being, and relationship quality. Combat injury, pain, and mental health outcomes in US Army service members. Distinct brain volume abnormalities in clinical high-risk individuals: pre- and post-antipsychotic treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1