Current opinions on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101938
Efstathios T Pavlidis, Ioannis N Galanis, Theodoros E Pavlidis
{"title":"Current opinions on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","authors":"Efstathios T Pavlidis, Ioannis N Galanis, Theodoros E Pavlidis","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inappropriate use of antibiotics leads to microbial resistance. Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy is well known for reducing the risk of postoperative infection in high-risk patients despite some conflicting aspects. High-risk patients are those who are older than 70 years, have diabetes mellitus, whose operation time exceeded 120 minutes, have acute cholecystitis, experienced iatrogenic intraoperative gallbladder perforation resulting in bile or gallstone spillage, suffered from obstructive jaundice, or were deemed immunocompromised. For gallbladder perforation, one dose of antibiotic prophylaxis is sufficient. Therefore, guidelines are needed and must be strictly followed. Prophylactic treatment is not needed for patients at low risk of developing sepsis following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although the opposite is supported. Similarly, superficial surgical infections are related to low morbidity. Patients without risk factors have a very low risk of infection. Thus, the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"101938"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inappropriate use of antibiotics leads to microbial resistance. Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy is well known for reducing the risk of postoperative infection in high-risk patients despite some conflicting aspects. High-risk patients are those who are older than 70 years, have diabetes mellitus, whose operation time exceeded 120 minutes, have acute cholecystitis, experienced iatrogenic intraoperative gallbladder perforation resulting in bile or gallstone spillage, suffered from obstructive jaundice, or were deemed immunocompromised. For gallbladder perforation, one dose of antibiotic prophylaxis is sufficient. Therefore, guidelines are needed and must be strictly followed. Prophylactic treatment is not needed for patients at low risk of developing sepsis following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although the opposite is supported. Similarly, superficial surgical infections are related to low morbidity. Patients without risk factors have a very low risk of infection. Thus, the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者预防性抗生素使用现状分析。
不当使用抗生素会导致微生物产生耐药性。众所周知,腹腔镜胆囊切除术前单剂量抗生素预防可以降低高危患者术后感染的风险,尽管存在一些相互矛盾的方面。高龄70岁以上、糖尿病患者、手术时间超过120分钟、急性胆囊炎、术中医源性胆囊穿孔导致胆汁或胆结石外溢、梗阻性黄疸或免疫功能低下者为高危患者。对于胆囊穿孔,一剂抗生素预防就足够了。因此,指导方针是必要的,必须严格遵守。选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术后发生脓毒症的低风险患者不需要预防性治疗,尽管支持相反的治疗。同样,浅表手术感染的发病率也较低。无危险因素的患者感染风险极低。因此,不建议在选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术中常规使用抗生素预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
期刊最新文献
Augmented intelligence in "robotic" liver surgery: Integrating augmented reality and artificial intelligence for real-time navigation and margin precision. Synchronous vs sequential combination of transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Efficacy and prognosis. Colitis cystica profunda diagnosed by laparoscopic excision: A case report and review of literature. Clinical controls and model calibration as keys to complete blood count-based studies of pediatric fistula-in-ano. Two-port vs four-port laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: Efficacy and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1