Comprehensive Analysis of Heart Failure Subtypes Presenting at Emergency Department for Acute Heart Failure Management

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.002
Sunita Pokhrel Bhattarai PhD, RN, Dillon J. Dzikowicz PhD, RN, PCCN, Ying Xue DNSc, RN, Robert Block MD, MPH, FACP, FNLA, Rebecca G. Tucker PhD, RN, ACNPC, Mary G. Carey PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN
{"title":"Comprehensive Analysis of Heart Failure Subtypes Presenting at Emergency Department for Acute Heart Failure Management","authors":"Sunita Pokhrel Bhattarai PhD, RN,&nbsp;Dillon J. Dzikowicz PhD, RN, PCCN,&nbsp;Ying Xue DNSc, RN,&nbsp;Robert Block MD, MPH, FACP, FNLA,&nbsp;Rebecca G. Tucker PhD, RN, ACNPC,&nbsp;Mary G. Carey PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><span>Despite advances in echocardiography and biomarkers, the pathophysiological complexities among heart failure categories remain incompletely understood. This study analyzed patients’ characteristics across </span>heart failure with reduced ejection fraction<span>, heart failure with midrange ejection fraction<span>, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction<span> presenting at the emergency department.</span></span></span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective analysis of 954 patients with acute heart failure<span><span> (2016-2023) using electronic health records. Data were collected from patient triage and the emergency department and during hospitalization. </span>Survival analysis<span> was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and an elastic net model was used to handle multicollinearity and high dimensionality in predictor variables.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Patients (median age, 71 years) were categorized as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction<span> (n = 363), heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (n = 131), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction<span> (n = 460). Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction were older (80 vs 77 vs 74 years; </span></span></span><em>P &lt;</em><span><span><span> .001). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction showed higher prevalence of cardiomegaly, </span>pleural effusion, and </span>orthopnea (34% and 51%; </span><em>P &lt;</em><span> .001), elevated diastolic blood pressure (</span><em>P &lt;</em> .001), creatinine, N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (<em>P &lt;</em> .001), and hematocrit differences (<em>P &lt;</em><span> .05) than heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Echocardiographic measures differed significantly across subtypes. In-hospital prediction models achieved an area under the curve of 0.84 (91% sensitivity, 50% specificity); 30-day models had an area under the curve of 0.80 (98% sensitivity, 50% specificity).</span></div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div><span>HF subtypes exhibit distinct clinical and biomarker profiles. Emergency nurses’ recognition of these differences during initial assessment may enhance risk stratification and tailored interventions (eg, prioritizing </span>diuretics<span> in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, managing comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction), improving outcomes. Integrating subtype-specific data into protocols could optimize emergency department care, particularly during prolonged boarding.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":"51 5","pages":"Pages 946-960"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176725000881","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite advances in echocardiography and biomarkers, the pathophysiological complexities among heart failure categories remain incompletely understood. This study analyzed patients’ characteristics across heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure with midrange ejection fraction, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction presenting at the emergency department.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of 954 patients with acute heart failure (2016-2023) using electronic health records. Data were collected from patient triage and the emergency department and during hospitalization. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and an elastic net model was used to handle multicollinearity and high dimensionality in predictor variables.

Results

Patients (median age, 71 years) were categorized as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n = 363), heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (n = 131), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n = 460). Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction were older (80 vs 77 vs 74 years; P < .001). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction showed higher prevalence of cardiomegaly, pleural effusion, and orthopnea (34% and 51%; P < .001), elevated diastolic blood pressure (P < .001), creatinine, N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (P < .001), and hematocrit differences (P < .05) than heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Echocardiographic measures differed significantly across subtypes. In-hospital prediction models achieved an area under the curve of 0.84 (91% sensitivity, 50% specificity); 30-day models had an area under the curve of 0.80 (98% sensitivity, 50% specificity).

Discussion

HF subtypes exhibit distinct clinical and biomarker profiles. Emergency nurses’ recognition of these differences during initial assessment may enhance risk stratification and tailored interventions (eg, prioritizing diuretics in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, managing comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction), improving outcomes. Integrating subtype-specific data into protocols could optimize emergency department care, particularly during prolonged boarding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科急性心衰治疗心衰亚型综合分析
导读:尽管超声心动图和生物标志物有了进步,但心衰类别的病理生理复杂性仍然不完全清楚。本研究分析了急诊科出现的射血分数降低型心衰、射血分数中等型心衰和射血分数保留型心衰患者的特征。方法:对2016-2023年954例急性心力衰竭患者的电子病历进行回顾性分析。数据收集于病人分诊、急诊科和住院期间。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier估计,弹性网络模型用于处理多重共线性和预测变量的高维性。结果:患者(年龄中位数为71岁)分为射血分数降低的心力衰竭(n = 363)、射血分数中等的心力衰竭(n = 131)和射血分数保持的心力衰竭(n = 460)。保留射血分数的心力衰竭患者年龄较大(80岁vs 77岁vs 74岁;P < 0.001)。心力衰竭伴射血分数降低时,心脏扩大、胸腔积液和矫形通气的患病率更高(34%和51%;P < 0.001),舒张压升高(P < 0.001),肌酐,n端前b型利钠肽(P < 0.001)和红细胞压积差异(P < 0.05)与保留射血分数的心力衰竭相比。超声心动图测量结果在不同亚型间差异显著。院内预测模型的曲线下面积为0.84(灵敏度91%,特异性50%);30天模型的曲线下面积为0.80(灵敏度98%,特异性50%)。讨论:HF亚型表现出不同的临床和生物标志物特征。急诊护士在初步评估时对这些差异的认识可能会加强风险分层和量身定制的干预措施(例如,对射血分数降低的心力衰竭优先使用利尿剂,对射血分数保留的心力衰竭的合并症进行管理),改善结果。将特定亚型的数据整合到协议中可以优化急诊科的护理,特别是在长时间的住院期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Balancing Cure and Care for Geriatric Patients With Frailty in Emergency Care: A Qualitative Study Beneath the Personal Protective Equipment: Perspectives on Infection Prevention and Control From Emergency Department Health Care Personnel Associations Among Workplace Bullying, Workplace Social Capital, and Turnover Intention Among Iranian Emergency Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1