A Comparative Study between Double Knot and Single Knot Tension Band Wire Techniques in Mayo Type IIA Olecranon Fracture.

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2025-04-01
M E Choudhury, M Hossen, A Z Chowdhury, M J Alam, L Ferdous, M K Saha, M S Islam, M Ahmmad, S Islam, A B M Jahan, S M Ahmed, M Sanker
{"title":"A Comparative Study between Double Knot and Single Knot Tension Band Wire Techniques in Mayo Type IIA Olecranon Fracture.","authors":"M E Choudhury, M Hossen, A Z Chowdhury, M J Alam, L Ferdous, M K Saha, M S Islam, M Ahmmad, S Islam, A B M Jahan, S M Ahmed, M Sanker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Olecranon fracture, common in upper extremity trauma, occurs due to a direct impact to the point of the elbow or a fall onto an outstretched hand. Being an intra-articular fracture, treatment is aimed to anatomic reduction, stable fixation and early mobilization. Tension band wiring (TBW) is a popular and widely practiced method using either single or double knot technique. But in our country single knot technique is commonly practiced. Aim of this study was to compare the clinical, radiological and functional outcome between double knot and single knot TBW techniques in Mayo type IIA olecranon fracture. This prospective observational study was conducted at NITOR, Dhaka, Bangladesh from January 2018 to December 2019. Patients with Mayo type IIA olecranon fractures were enrolled. Total 54 cases were included. Among them, 29 cases were treated with single knot (SK group) and 25 were treated with double knot (DK group). Both groups were compared by clinical and radiological outcome. Persistent mild pain and symptomatic hardware was significantly more among the SK group (p value 0.045 for both). No other significant inter group differences were found on overall incidence of complications (p value 0.0825), the arc of motion and MEPS. The final outcome of 49 cases, 25(51.02%) were excellent and remaining 24(48.98%) were good. Both procedures were safe in regard to overall complication rate. Double knot group had significantly more excellent results then single knot group (p value 0.022). It was concluded that, double knot TBW technique provides better outcome than single knot technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":94148,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":"34 2","pages":"476-481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Olecranon fracture, common in upper extremity trauma, occurs due to a direct impact to the point of the elbow or a fall onto an outstretched hand. Being an intra-articular fracture, treatment is aimed to anatomic reduction, stable fixation and early mobilization. Tension band wiring (TBW) is a popular and widely practiced method using either single or double knot technique. But in our country single knot technique is commonly practiced. Aim of this study was to compare the clinical, radiological and functional outcome between double knot and single knot TBW techniques in Mayo type IIA olecranon fracture. This prospective observational study was conducted at NITOR, Dhaka, Bangladesh from January 2018 to December 2019. Patients with Mayo type IIA olecranon fractures were enrolled. Total 54 cases were included. Among them, 29 cases were treated with single knot (SK group) and 25 were treated with double knot (DK group). Both groups were compared by clinical and radiological outcome. Persistent mild pain and symptomatic hardware was significantly more among the SK group (p value 0.045 for both). No other significant inter group differences were found on overall incidence of complications (p value 0.0825), the arc of motion and MEPS. The final outcome of 49 cases, 25(51.02%) were excellent and remaining 24(48.98%) were good. Both procedures were safe in regard to overall complication rate. Double knot group had significantly more excellent results then single knot group (p value 0.022). It was concluded that, double knot TBW technique provides better outcome than single knot technique.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双结与单结张力带钢丝技术治疗Mayoⅱ型鹰嘴骨折的比较研究。
肩胛骨骨折常见于上肢创伤,发生原因是肘部受到直接撞击或摔倒在伸出的手上。作为一种关节内骨折,治疗的目的是解剖复位、稳定固定和早期活动。张力带接线(TBW)是一种流行且广泛采用的方法,可使用单结或双结技术。但在我国,通常采用单结技术。本研究旨在比较双结和单结 TBW 技术在梅奥 IIA 型肩胛骨骨折中的临床、放射学和功能结果。这项前瞻性观察研究于 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月在孟加拉国达卡的 NITOR 进行。研究纳入了 Mayo IIA 型肩胛骨骨折患者。共纳入 54 例。其中,29 例采用单结治疗(SK 组),25 例采用双结治疗(DK 组)。两组患者的临床和影像学结果进行了比较。SK组中持续性轻微疼痛和无症状硬件明显增多(P值均为0.045)。在并发症总发生率(P 值为 0.0825)、活动弧度和 MEPS 方面,两组间没有发现其他明显差异。在49例最终结果中,25例(51.02%)为优,其余24例(48.98%)为良。就总体并发症发生率而言,两种手术都很安全。双结组的结果明显优于单结组(P 值为 0.022)。结论是,双结 TBW 技术比单结技术效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Serum Vitamin D Status with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: An Experience from a Tertiary Level Specialized Diabetic Hospital in Bangladesh. Association between Dermatoglyphics and Blood Group. Association of Acidosis and Inflammation with Low Serum Albumin in CKD Stages 3-5 Predialysis Patients. Association of Glycemic Gap with In-Hospital Adverse Outcome after First Attack of Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Thrombolysed Patients. Clinical Evaluation and Comparison of Parental Satisfaction between Anterior Strip Crown and Conventional Composite Restoration: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1