Asymmetric dynamics between supply chain disruptions, oil price shocks, and U.S. investor sentiment

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108440
Linyue Li
{"title":"Asymmetric dynamics between supply chain disruptions, oil price shocks, and U.S. investor sentiment","authors":"Linyue Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic, ongoing Ukraine-Russian conflict, tensions in the Middle East, and US-China trade tensions have severely disrupted global supply chains and the oil market. Amid these distortions, the global supply chain pressures (GSCP) and oil price shocks (OPS) significantly influence investor sentiment. The global shocks are dynamic and asymmetric by nature. Therefore, this research explores the asymmetric impacts of GSCP and OPS on investor sentiment in the United States. We estimate both the short- and long-run associations with monthly data from 1998 to 2023 using a nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag model. After confirming the nonlinearity of the data and preliminary investigations, our long-run estimates reveal that positive GSCP shocks negatively impact investor sentiment, while negative GSCP shocks have insignificant effects. In contrast, positive and negative OPS shocks enhance investor sentiment. This study finds that negative shocks (GSCP-) have a more severe and prolonged impact on investor sentiment than positive shocks (GSCP+), highlighting the need for asymmetry in policy analysis. Similarly, OPS- exerts a stronger influence on investor sentiment than OPS+, with growing disparities over time, emphasizing the asymmetric nature of market reactions to shocks.The findings recommend that policymakers encourage supply chain resilience and diversification strategies to mitigate oil price uncertainty and supply chain disruptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 108440"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325002646","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic, ongoing Ukraine-Russian conflict, tensions in the Middle East, and US-China trade tensions have severely disrupted global supply chains and the oil market. Amid these distortions, the global supply chain pressures (GSCP) and oil price shocks (OPS) significantly influence investor sentiment. The global shocks are dynamic and asymmetric by nature. Therefore, this research explores the asymmetric impacts of GSCP and OPS on investor sentiment in the United States. We estimate both the short- and long-run associations with monthly data from 1998 to 2023 using a nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag model. After confirming the nonlinearity of the data and preliminary investigations, our long-run estimates reveal that positive GSCP shocks negatively impact investor sentiment, while negative GSCP shocks have insignificant effects. In contrast, positive and negative OPS shocks enhance investor sentiment. This study finds that negative shocks (GSCP-) have a more severe and prolonged impact on investor sentiment than positive shocks (GSCP+), highlighting the need for asymmetry in policy analysis. Similarly, OPS- exerts a stronger influence on investor sentiment than OPS+, with growing disparities over time, emphasizing the asymmetric nature of market reactions to shocks.The findings recommend that policymakers encourage supply chain resilience and diversification strategies to mitigate oil price uncertainty and supply chain disruptions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链中断、油价冲击和美国投资者情绪之间的不对称动态
COVID-19 大流行病、持续的乌克兰-俄罗斯冲突、中东紧张局势和中美贸易紧张局势严重扰乱了全球供应链和石油市场。在这些扭曲中,全球供应链压力(GSCP)和石油价格冲击(OPS)极大地影响了投资者的情绪。全球冲击具有动态性和非对称性。因此,本研究探讨了全球供应链压力和油价冲击对美国投资者情绪的非对称影响。我们利用 1998 年至 2023 年的月度数据,使用非线性自回归分布滞后模型估计了短期和长期关联。在确认了数据的非线性和初步调查后,我们的长期估计结果显示,GSCP 的正向冲击会对投资者情绪产生负面影响,而 GSCP 的负向冲击则影响不明显。相比之下,正向和负向 OPS 冲击会增强投资者情绪。本研究发现,与正向冲击(GSCP+)相比,负向冲击(GSCP-)对投资者情绪的影响更严重、更持久,这凸显了政策分析中不对称的必要性。同样,OPS- 比 OPS+ 对投资者情绪的影响更大,而且随着时间的推移,差异越来越大,强调了市场对冲击反应的非对称性。研究结果建议政策制定者鼓励供应链弹性和多样化战略,以缓解石油价格的不确定性和供应链中断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Time segmentation in tanker freight markets: The role of risk and relative freight rates in switching decisions Multi-agent collaboration-driven energy structure transition: A quadripartite evolutionary game analysis framework integrating carbon, electricity, and green certificate markets Market structure and technology adoption in renewable energy Economic emission dispatching strategy considering dynamic parameter effects: A novel approach based on projection neural networks and deep learning Interactions between multiple environmental markets: addressing contamination bias in overlapping policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1