Identifying and Prioritizing Recommendations to Optimize Transitions Across the Care Journey for Hip Fractures: Results From a Mixed-methods Concept Mapping Study in Ontario, Canada 1130

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.055
Sara Guilcher, Lauren Cadel, Amanda Everall, Walter Wodchis, Susan Bronskill, Kednapa Thavorn, Kerry Kuluski
{"title":"Identifying and Prioritizing Recommendations to Optimize Transitions Across the Care Journey for Hip Fractures: Results From a Mixed-methods Concept Mapping Study in Ontario, Canada 1130","authors":"Sara Guilcher,&nbsp;Lauren Cadel,&nbsp;Amanda Everall,&nbsp;Walter Wodchis,&nbsp;Susan Bronskill,&nbsp;Kednapa Thavorn,&nbsp;Kerry Kuluski","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To create a list of actionable and prioritized recommendations to improve care transitions for individuals with hip fracture from the perspectives of persons with lived experience, care partners, health care providers, and decision-makers.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Mixed methods, concept mapping study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Ontario, Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Participants included persons who had experienced a hip fracture, care partners, health care providers, and decision-makers. All participants were required to be ≥18 and speak English. Persons with lived experience were required to have received care for a hip fracture in Ontario; care partners were required to have provided care for an individual who experienced a hip fracture; health care providers and decision-makers were required to have provided care in a paid capacity for individuals with hip fracture or to influence policy or procedures relating to hip fracture. We used a multipronged purposive sampling strategy to recruit participants.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Perspectives of key stakeholders on what is needed to improve care transitions for hip fracture.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final cluster map selected by participants was an 8-cluster map, with the following cluster labels: (1) access to inpatient services and supports across the care continuum; (2) informed and collaborative discharge planning; (3) access to transitional and outpatient services; (4) communication, education and knowledge acquisition; (5) support for care partners; (6) person-centered care; (7) physical, social, and cognitive activities and supports; and (8) provider knowledge, skills, roles and behaviors. Provider knowledge, skills, roles and behaviors was rated by participants as the most important cluster.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study findings highlight the importance of person-centered care, with active involvement of persons with lived experience and their care partners throughout the care journey. This study provides insights for future interventions and quality improvement initiatives for enhancing transitions in care among hip fracture populations.</div></div><div><h3>Disclosures</h3><div>none.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 4","pages":"Pages e21-e22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325000814","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To create a list of actionable and prioritized recommendations to improve care transitions for individuals with hip fracture from the perspectives of persons with lived experience, care partners, health care providers, and decision-makers.

Design

Mixed methods, concept mapping study.

Setting

Ontario, Canada.

Participants

Participants included persons who had experienced a hip fracture, care partners, health care providers, and decision-makers. All participants were required to be ≥18 and speak English. Persons with lived experience were required to have received care for a hip fracture in Ontario; care partners were required to have provided care for an individual who experienced a hip fracture; health care providers and decision-makers were required to have provided care in a paid capacity for individuals with hip fracture or to influence policy or procedures relating to hip fracture. We used a multipronged purposive sampling strategy to recruit participants.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Perspectives of key stakeholders on what is needed to improve care transitions for hip fracture.

Results

The final cluster map selected by participants was an 8-cluster map, with the following cluster labels: (1) access to inpatient services and supports across the care continuum; (2) informed and collaborative discharge planning; (3) access to transitional and outpatient services; (4) communication, education and knowledge acquisition; (5) support for care partners; (6) person-centered care; (7) physical, social, and cognitive activities and supports; and (8) provider knowledge, skills, roles and behaviors. Provider knowledge, skills, roles and behaviors was rated by participants as the most important cluster.

Conclusions

Our study findings highlight the importance of person-centered care, with active involvement of persons with lived experience and their care partners throughout the care journey. This study provides insights for future interventions and quality improvement initiatives for enhancing transitions in care among hip fracture populations.

Disclosures

none.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别和优先推荐优化髋部骨折护理过程中的过渡:来自加拿大安大略省混合方法概念图研究的结果
目的从有生活经验的人、护理伙伴、卫生保健提供者和决策者的角度,建立一份可操作的优先建议清单,以改善髋部骨折患者的护理过渡。设计混合方法,概念图研究。SettingOntario,加拿大。参与者包括经历过髋部骨折的人、护理伙伴、卫生保健提供者和决策者。所有受试者要求年龄≥18岁,会说英语。有生活经验的人必须在安大略省接受过髋部骨折的治疗;护理伙伴被要求为经历髋部骨折的个体提供护理;保健提供者和决策者必须以有偿的方式为髋部骨折患者提供护理,或影响与髋部骨折有关的政策或程序。我们采用多管齐下的有目的抽样策略来招募参与者。InterventionsNot适用。主要结局测量主要利益相关者对改善髋部骨折护理转变所需的观点。结果参与者最终选择的聚类图为8个聚类图,聚类标签如下:(1)获得住院服务和整个护理连续体的支持;(2)知情协同的出院计划;(3)获得过渡性和门诊服务;(4)沟通、教育和知识获取;(5)对护理伙伴的支持;(6)以人为本的护理;(7)身体、社会和认知活动和支持;(8)提供者的知识、技能、角色和行为。参与者认为提供者的知识、技能、角色和行为是最重要的集群。结论我们的研究结果强调了以人为本的护理的重要性,在整个护理过程中,有生活经验的人及其护理伙伴积极参与。本研究为未来的干预措施和质量改进举措提供了见解,以加强髋部骨折人群的护理转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Relationships of substance use disorders with discharge outcomes following inpatient rehabilitation: A retrospective cohort study. Development of the PedsADAPSS: A Measure of Disability Appraisals in Youth with Spinal Cord Injury. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus nerve stimulation paired with exercise training for upper-limb motor function and activities of daily living after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Falls Prevention for Older Adults With Mental Health Conditions: A Practical Guide for Rehabilitation Professionals. Letter to Editor on "Conservative Treatments of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1