Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1002/lio2.70076
Mazin Merdad, Nada Al Taylouni
{"title":"Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?","authors":"Mazin Merdad,&nbsp;Nada Al Taylouni","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\n \n <p>PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Both electronic and manual search strategies were conducted within the abovementioned databases and included articles and reviews to find the relevant studies. Rates of occult nodal metastasis, survival outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed in N0 patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy with END. Fixed and random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates of overall survival metastasis rates with 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity was assessed using tau<sup>2</sup>, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>, and Cochran's <i>Q</i> test. Statistical analyses were performed in R software with <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 as significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The included eight studies reported occult metastasis rates ranging from 4% to 10% in clinically N0 necks post-radiotherapy. Overall survival was approximately 52%, with mixed evidence on the survival advantage of END. Disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival rates ranged from 71.7% to 95.5% at 5 years. Complication rates associated with END were high, with up to 47.4% of patients experiencing postoperative morbidity. The metastasis rate was 10%–13% highlighting the ability of END to detect occult metastases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The survival benefits of END are not consistently supported by current evidence, while the significant morbidity associated with the procedure raises concerns about its routine use. A conservative approach may be more appropriate for clinically node-negative patients, particularly when weighed against the elevated risks of complications. END demonstrates moderate overall survival rates and an ability to detect occult metastases, but its role in improving long-term outcomes remains unclear. Larger prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to better define the indications and outcomes of END in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.

Data Sources

PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies.

Methods

Both electronic and manual search strategies were conducted within the abovementioned databases and included articles and reviews to find the relevant studies. Rates of occult nodal metastasis, survival outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed in N0 patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy with END. Fixed and random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates of overall survival metastasis rates with 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity was assessed using tau2, I2, and Cochran's Q test. Statistical analyses were performed in R software with p < 0.05 as significant.

Results

The included eight studies reported occult metastasis rates ranging from 4% to 10% in clinically N0 necks post-radiotherapy. Overall survival was approximately 52%, with mixed evidence on the survival advantage of END. Disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival rates ranged from 71.7% to 95.5% at 5 years. Complication rates associated with END were high, with up to 47.4% of patients experiencing postoperative morbidity. The metastasis rate was 10%–13% highlighting the ability of END to detect occult metastases.

Conclusion

The survival benefits of END are not consistently supported by current evidence, while the significant morbidity associated with the procedure raises concerns about its routine use. A conservative approach may be more appropriate for clinically node-negative patients, particularly when weighed against the elevated risks of complications. END demonstrates moderate overall survival rates and an ability to detect occult metastases, but its role in improving long-term outcomes remains unclear. Larger prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to better define the indications and outcomes of END in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临床0例患者中保留喉切除术:是否需要选择性颈部清扫?
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析探讨选择性颈部清扫术(END)在临床no颈部抢救管理中的作用。系统检索PubMed/Medline、谷歌Scholar、Cochrane Library等相关研究。方法采用电子检索和人工检索两种方法,在上述数据库中检索相关文献和综述。我们分析了N0例接受保留性喉切除术合并END的患者的隐匿淋巴结转移率、生存结果和术后并发症。固定效应和随机效应模型用于计算总生存转移率的合并估计,其置信区间为95%,并使用tau2、I2和Cochran’s Q检验评估异质性。采用R软件进行统计学分析,p <; 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果纳入的8项研究报告了临床N0颈部放疗后的隐匿转移率为4%至10%。总生存率约为52%,END的生存优势证据不一。5年无病生存率和无复发生存率从71.7%到95.5%不等。与END相关的并发症发生率很高,高达47.4%的患者出现术后并发症。转移率为10%-13%,显示了END检测隐匿性转移的能力。目前的证据并不一致地支持END的生存益处,而与该手术相关的显著发病率引起了人们对其常规使用的担忧。保守方法可能更适合临床淋巴结阴性患者,特别是在权衡并发症风险升高的情况下。END显示出中等的总生存率和发现隐匿性转移的能力,但其在改善长期预后方面的作用尚不清楚。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究和随机试验来更好地定义END在临床0号颈部抢救管理中的适应症和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Appraisal of Readability in Patient-Facing Resources for the Inspire Hypoglossal Nerve Implant. Variability in Physical Exam Documentation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Issue Information Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Autoimmune Diseases: A Comprehensive Large Population-Based Analysis Geospatial Analysis of Rural–Urban Access of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgeons and Clinics in Vermont
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1