Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Specialized Multidisciplinary Late Sequelae Clinics: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006714
Mira Mekhael, Helle Ø Kristensen, Mette Borre, Asbjørn M Drewes, Katrine J Emmertsen, Janne Fassov, Klaus Krogh, Michael B Lauritzen, Søren Laurberg, Jakob Lykke Poulsen, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Peter Christensen, Therese Juul
{"title":"Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Specialized Multidisciplinary Late Sequelae Clinics: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Mira Mekhael, Helle Ø Kristensen, Mette Borre, Asbjørn M Drewes, Katrine J Emmertsen, Janne Fassov, Klaus Krogh, Michael B Lauritzen, Søren Laurberg, Jakob Lykke Poulsen, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Peter Christensen, Therese Juul","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of a multidisciplinary effort involving surgical and gastroenterological departments in managing bowel dysfunction, specifically low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), following rectal cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>An increasing number of rectal cancer survivors experience LARS, heightening the need for specialized treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients referred to our late sequelae clinics with LARS following sphincter-preserving treatment were eligible for inclusion. Patients were treated in the surgical or gastroenterological units or both based on symptoms. Patients completed patient-reported outcome measures at the first visit, upon discharge, and 12 months after discharge. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by the LARS score and its five single items, six single items covering additional LARS symptoms, the EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS and utility scores, self-rated bowel function, and bowel function impact on quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 201 patients. Three-quarters were treated in the surgical units, whereas the rest required gastroenterological treatment. After treatment, the mean LARS score decreased by 4.7 points (P<0.001), whereas the mean EQ-VAS and utility score increased by 7.1 (P<0.001) and 0.06 points (P<0.001), respectively. All individual symptoms significantly improved. Improvement in self-rated bowel function and bowel function impact on QoL were 55.8% (P<0.001) and 45.7% (P<0.001), respectively. Similar results were recorded at the 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results encourage establishing late sequelae clinics with a joint gastroenterological and surgical approach to treat LARS following rectal cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006714","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of a multidisciplinary effort involving surgical and gastroenterological departments in managing bowel dysfunction, specifically low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), following rectal cancer treatment.

Summary background data: An increasing number of rectal cancer survivors experience LARS, heightening the need for specialized treatment.

Methods: Patients referred to our late sequelae clinics with LARS following sphincter-preserving treatment were eligible for inclusion. Patients were treated in the surgical or gastroenterological units or both based on symptoms. Patients completed patient-reported outcome measures at the first visit, upon discharge, and 12 months after discharge. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by the LARS score and its five single items, six single items covering additional LARS symptoms, the EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS and utility scores, self-rated bowel function, and bowel function impact on quality of life (QoL).

Results: We included 201 patients. Three-quarters were treated in the surgical units, whereas the rest required gastroenterological treatment. After treatment, the mean LARS score decreased by 4.7 points (P<0.001), whereas the mean EQ-VAS and utility score increased by 7.1 (P<0.001) and 0.06 points (P<0.001), respectively. All individual symptoms significantly improved. Improvement in self-rated bowel function and bowel function impact on QoL were 55.8% (P<0.001) and 45.7% (P<0.001), respectively. Similar results were recorded at the 12-month follow-up.

Conclusion: These results encourage establishing late sequelae clinics with a joint gastroenterological and surgical approach to treat LARS following rectal cancer treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专科多学科晚期后遗症门诊治疗下前切除术综合征:一项前瞻性队列研究。
目的评估外科和肠胃科等多学科合作治疗直肠癌术后肠道功能障碍(尤其是低位前切除综合征(LARS))的效果:越来越多的直肠癌幸存者会出现 LARS,这增加了对专业治疗的需求:方法:接受保留括约肌治疗后转诊到我们的晚期后遗症门诊并患有 LARS 的患者均符合纳入条件。患者根据症状在外科或胃肠科接受治疗,或同时在外科和胃肠科接受治疗。患者在首次就诊时、出院时和出院后 12 个月内填写了患者报告结果测量表。治疗结果通过 LARS 评分及其五个单项、涵盖其他 LARS 症状的六个单项、欧洲生活质量五维度五级(EQ-5D-5L)VAS 和效用评分、肠道功能自评以及肠道功能对生活质量(QoL)的影响进行评估:我们纳入了 201 名患者。结果:我们纳入了 201 名患者,其中四分之三在外科接受了治疗,其余患者则需要接受胃肠病治疗。治疗后,LARS 平均得分降低了 4.7 分(PC):这些结果鼓励建立晚期后遗症诊所,采用胃肠病学和外科联合方法治疗直肠癌治疗后的 LARS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
Transplantation Within 6 Months of Registration Does not Enhance Survival for Patients With Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Who Do We Fail to Rescue After Pancreatoduodenectomy? Outcomes Among >4000 Procedures Expose Windows of Opportunity. Living Donor Availability Improves Patient Survival in a North American Center: An Intention-to-treat Analysis. The Use of Frailty Scores for Screening the Surgical Risk Benefits: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Associations of Resilience, Perceived Control of Health, and Depression With Geriatric Outcomes After Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1