Bridging to Heart Transplantation With Intraaortic Balloon Pump Versus Impella 5.5.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002432
Spencer E Kim, Max Shin, Amit Iyengar, Noah Weingarten, Dun Jin, Rachel Wilson, Michaela Asher, Omar Toubat, Pavan Atluri
{"title":"Bridging to Heart Transplantation With Intraaortic Balloon Pump Versus Impella 5.5.","authors":"Spencer E Kim, Max Shin, Amit Iyengar, Noah Weingarten, Dun Jin, Rachel Wilson, Michaela Asher, Omar Toubat, Pavan Atluri","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we compare the clinical characteristics and courses of patients directly bridged to heart transplant with intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) versus Impella 5.5. We performed a retrospective cohort study of single-center institutional data including all adult patients at our institution bridged to transplant with either IABP or Impella 5.5 support between October 18, 2018, and May 31, 2023. Ninety-one heart transplant recipients were included in this study, of whom 54 (59%) were bridged on IABP and 37 (41%) were bridged on Impella 5.5. Patients supported with Impella 5.5 had comparable baseline characteristics compared to those bridged on IABP (all p > 0.05). However, Impella 5.5 patients had lower vasoactive inotropic scores during their temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) period than those bridged on IABP (all p < 0.05). Duration of MCS and post-transplant intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay were longer for Impella 5.5 patients (all p < 0.05), but rates of complications after transplant were comparable (all p > 0.05). Survival at 1 year post-transplant was significantly greater for the Impella 5.5 group (100% vs. 87%; p = 0.039). Given the increased use of MCS as a bridge to transplant, this project has important implications for preoperative management of waitlist patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"800-806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we compare the clinical characteristics and courses of patients directly bridged to heart transplant with intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) versus Impella 5.5. We performed a retrospective cohort study of single-center institutional data including all adult patients at our institution bridged to transplant with either IABP or Impella 5.5 support between October 18, 2018, and May 31, 2023. Ninety-one heart transplant recipients were included in this study, of whom 54 (59%) were bridged on IABP and 37 (41%) were bridged on Impella 5.5. Patients supported with Impella 5.5 had comparable baseline characteristics compared to those bridged on IABP (all p > 0.05). However, Impella 5.5 patients had lower vasoactive inotropic scores during their temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) period than those bridged on IABP (all p < 0.05). Duration of MCS and post-transplant intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay were longer for Impella 5.5 patients (all p < 0.05), but rates of complications after transplant were comparable (all p > 0.05). Survival at 1 year post-transplant was significantly greater for the Impella 5.5 group (100% vs. 87%; p = 0.039). Given the increased use of MCS as a bridge to transplant, this project has important implications for preoperative management of waitlist patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动脉内球囊泵与Impella 5.5的心脏移植桥接。
在这项研究中,我们比较了主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)与Impella 5.5直接桥接心脏移植患者的临床特征和病程。我们对2018年10月18日至2023年5月31日期间在我院接受IABP或Impella 5.5支持进行移植的所有成年患者进行了单中心机构数据的回顾性队列研究。本研究纳入91例心脏移植受者,其中54例(59%)采用IABP桥接,37例(41%)采用Impella 5.5桥接。与使用IABP桥接的患者相比,使用Impella 5.5的患者具有相似的基线特征(p < 0.05)。然而,Impella 5.5患者在临时机械循环支持(MCS)期间血管活性肌力评分低于IABP桥接患者(均p < 0.05)。Impella 5.5患者的MCS时间和移植后重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间更长(均p < 0.05),但移植后并发症发生率相当(均p < 0.05)。移植后1年生存率显著高于Impella 5.5组(100% vs. 87%;P = 0.039)。鉴于MCS作为移植的桥梁的使用越来越多,该项目对等待名单患者的术前管理具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
期刊最新文献
Introducer-Cannula Diameter Mismatch and Difficult Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation: A Case Report. Ethical Considerations in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Discontinuation Due to Resource Limitation. Response to Letter to the Editor (Ethical Considerations in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Discontinuation Due to Resource Limitation). Semi-Empirical Model to Predict Blood Flow in an Extracorporeal Respiratory Support Circuit Driven by Ventricular Assist Devices. Surgically Implanted Percutaneous Assist Device After Left Ventricular Assist Device Malfunction as a Bridge to Definitive Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1