Mechanical Subpulmonary Support in Fontan Circulation: A Juvenile Porcine Experimental Model.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002427
Naoya Sakoda, Yasuyuki Kobayashi, Daichi Edaki, Shingo Kasahara, Yasuhiro Kotani
{"title":"Mechanical Subpulmonary Support in Fontan Circulation: A Juvenile Porcine Experimental Model.","authors":"Naoya Sakoda, Yasuyuki Kobayashi, Daichi Edaki, Shingo Kasahara, Yasuhiro Kotani","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanical cavopulmonary assist (CPA) remains challenging for failing Fontan circulation. This study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic impact of partial CPA using a juvenile porcine model. Six pigs (30 kg) underwent the Fontan procedure using a handmade Y-shaped graft. Total CPA was established by assisting both superior vena cava (SVC) and inferior vena cava (IVC) flow to the pulmonary artery, whereas partial CPA assisted only IVC flow using a centrifugal pump. Cavopulmonary assist flow was set to 100%, 50%, or 25% of pre-Fontan cardiac output (CO). Hemodynamics at baseline, after total CPA, and after partial CPA were compared using paired t-tests. Total CPA with 100% CO support increased CO and reduced SVC and IVC pressures compared to baseline (CO, 1.03 vs. 2.36 L/min; SVC pressure, 16.3 vs. 9.5 mm Hg; IVC pressure, 17.3 vs. 9.3 mm Hg, p < 0.05 for all). Partial CPA with 25% CO support increased CO and decreased IVC pressure, though SVC pressure increased (CO, 1.03 vs. 1.52 L/min; SVC pressure, 16.3 vs. 20.5 mm Hg; IVC pressure, 17.3 vs. 11.5 mm Hg, p < 0.05 for all). Although total CPA achieved optimal hemodynamics, partial CPA with 25% CO flow was effective, suggesting a feasible, noninvasive solution for patients with failing Fontan physiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanical cavopulmonary assist (CPA) remains challenging for failing Fontan circulation. This study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic impact of partial CPA using a juvenile porcine model. Six pigs (30 kg) underwent the Fontan procedure using a handmade Y-shaped graft. Total CPA was established by assisting both superior vena cava (SVC) and inferior vena cava (IVC) flow to the pulmonary artery, whereas partial CPA assisted only IVC flow using a centrifugal pump. Cavopulmonary assist flow was set to 100%, 50%, or 25% of pre-Fontan cardiac output (CO). Hemodynamics at baseline, after total CPA, and after partial CPA were compared using paired t-tests. Total CPA with 100% CO support increased CO and reduced SVC and IVC pressures compared to baseline (CO, 1.03 vs. 2.36 L/min; SVC pressure, 16.3 vs. 9.5 mm Hg; IVC pressure, 17.3 vs. 9.3 mm Hg, p < 0.05 for all). Partial CPA with 25% CO support increased CO and decreased IVC pressure, though SVC pressure increased (CO, 1.03 vs. 1.52 L/min; SVC pressure, 16.3 vs. 20.5 mm Hg; IVC pressure, 17.3 vs. 11.5 mm Hg, p < 0.05 for all). Although total CPA achieved optimal hemodynamics, partial CPA with 25% CO flow was effective, suggesting a feasible, noninvasive solution for patients with failing Fontan physiology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
方潭循环机械肺下支持:幼年猪实验模型。
机械腔体肺辅助(CPA)仍然是方坦循环失败的挑战。本研究旨在利用幼年猪模型评估局部CPA对血流动力学的影响。6头猪(30公斤)接受了Fontan手术,采用手工y形移植物。通过辅助上腔静脉(SVC)和下腔静脉(IVC)流向肺动脉来建立总CPA,而部分CPA仅通过离心泵辅助IVC流动。空腔肺辅助流量设置为fontan前心输出量(CO)的100%、50%或25%。使用配对t检验比较基线、总CPA和部分CPA后的血流动力学。与基线相比,100% CO支持的总CPA增加了CO,降低了SVC和IVC压力(CO, 1.03 vs 2.36 L/min;SVC压力,16.3 vs. 9.5 mm Hg;下腔静脉压,17.3 vs. 9.3 mmhg, p < 0.05)。25% CO支持的局部CPA增加了CO,降低了IVC压力,但SVC压力增加了(CO, 1.03 vs. 1.52 L/min;SVC压力,16.3 vs. 20.5 mm Hg;下腔静脉压,17.3 vs. 11.5 mm Hg, p < 0.05)。虽然总CPA达到了最佳的血流动力学,但部分CPA在25% CO流量下是有效的,这为Fontan生理功能失败的患者提供了一种可行的、无创的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
期刊最新文献
Introducer-Cannula Diameter Mismatch and Difficult Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation: A Case Report. Ethical Considerations in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Discontinuation Due to Resource Limitation. Response to Letter to the Editor (Ethical Considerations in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Discontinuation Due to Resource Limitation). Semi-Empirical Model to Predict Blood Flow in an Extracorporeal Respiratory Support Circuit Driven by Ventricular Assist Devices. Surgically Implanted Percutaneous Assist Device After Left Ventricular Assist Device Malfunction as a Bridge to Definitive Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1