Enlarged Blind Spot Linked to Gamma Zone and Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-Like Structures in Non-Pathological Highly Myopic Eyes.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Investigative ophthalmology & visual science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1167/iovs.66.4.5
Qiuyan Wu, Ruihan Hu, Qihong Liu, Fang Li, Yuanyuan Wang, Zuohuizi Yi, Jiajia Yuan, Yilei Shao, Meixiao Shen, Hongmei Zheng, Changzheng Chen
{"title":"Enlarged Blind Spot Linked to Gamma Zone and Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-Like Structures in Non-Pathological Highly Myopic Eyes.","authors":"Qiuyan Wu, Ruihan Hu, Qihong Liu, Fang Li, Yuanyuan Wang, Zuohuizi Yi, Jiajia Yuan, Yilei Shao, Meixiao Shen, Hongmei Zheng, Changzheng Chen","doi":"10.1167/iovs.66.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of enlarged blind spots in non-pathological highly myopic eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Visual field conditions of 313 eyes in 172 individuals with high myopia were evaluated. Clinical characteristics of 116 eyes with enlarged blind spots and 116 eyes with normal visual fields were compared. Generalized-estimating equation (GEE) regression model were used to assess the factors associated with enlarged blind spots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of enlarged blind spots in non-pathological highly myopic eyes was 37.06% in this sample. Eyes with enlarged blind spots had larger gamma zone (P = 0.038), larger PHOMS area (P < 0.001), increased peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (P = 0.006), and decreased macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (P = 0.016) compared with eyes with normal visual fields. In multivariate regression analysis, an expanded gamma zone (OR = 2.004; P = 0.022) and a larger PHOMS area (OR = 4.414; P = 0.009) were associated with an enlarged blind spot.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An expanded gamma zone and a larger PHOMS area are associated with an enlarged blind spot, indicating that these two parameters may suggest a possibility of functional damage in early nonpathological, highly myopic eyes. This pattern of impairment might provide clues for the differential diagnosis between high myopia and glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":14620,"journal":{"name":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","volume":"66 4","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.4.5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of enlarged blind spots in non-pathological highly myopic eyes.

Methods: Visual field conditions of 313 eyes in 172 individuals with high myopia were evaluated. Clinical characteristics of 116 eyes with enlarged blind spots and 116 eyes with normal visual fields were compared. Generalized-estimating equation (GEE) regression model were used to assess the factors associated with enlarged blind spots.

Results: The frequency of enlarged blind spots in non-pathological highly myopic eyes was 37.06% in this sample. Eyes with enlarged blind spots had larger gamma zone (P = 0.038), larger PHOMS area (P < 0.001), increased peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (P = 0.006), and decreased macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (P = 0.016) compared with eyes with normal visual fields. In multivariate regression analysis, an expanded gamma zone (OR = 2.004; P = 0.022) and a larger PHOMS area (OR = 4.414; P = 0.009) were associated with an enlarged blind spot.

Conclusions: An expanded gamma zone and a larger PHOMS area are associated with an enlarged blind spot, indicating that these two parameters may suggest a possibility of functional damage in early nonpathological, highly myopic eyes. This pattern of impairment might provide clues for the differential diagnosis between high myopia and glaucoma.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非病理性高度近视眼与γ区和乳头周围高反射卵形团样结构相关的盲点增大。
目的:探讨非病理性高度近视眼盲点扩大的患病率及危险因素。方法:对172例高度近视患者313只眼的视野状况进行评价。比较116只视场正常眼与116只视场扩大眼的临床特点。采用广义估计方程(generalized - estimate equation, GEE)回归模型评估与盲点扩大相关的因素。结果:非病理性高度近视眼盲点扩大的发生率为37.06%。盲点增大的眼与正常视野的眼相比,gamma区增大(P = 0.038), PHOMS面积增大(P < 0.001),乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层厚度增大(P = 0.006),黄斑神经节细胞-内丛状层厚度减小(P = 0.016)。在多元回归分析中,扩大的伽马区(OR = 2.004;P = 0.022)和更大的PHOMS面积(OR = 4.414;P = 0.009)与盲区扩大相关。结论:gamma区扩大和PHOMS面积增大与盲点扩大相关,提示这两个参数可能提示早期非病理性高度近视眼存在功能损伤的可能性。这种损害模式可能为高度近视和青光眼的鉴别诊断提供线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
339
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), published as ready online, is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). IOVS features original research, mostly pertaining to clinical and laboratory ophthalmology and vision research in general.
期刊最新文献
Combined Expression of hRdCVF and hRdCVFL Through AAV-Mediated Delivery for the Treatment of Retinitis Pigmentosa. Classical Proprioceptors and Palisade Endings Have Distinct Molecular Profiles in Pig Eye Muscles. Neddylation-Mediated hnRNPA2B1 Degradation Aggravates Retinal Endothelial Cell Dysfunction in Diabetic Retinopathy by Regulating miR-93-5p/VEGFA. The Impact of Aging and Sex on Corneal Nerve Density and Function. CL-EVLPs Promote Corneal Repair in a BAC-Induced Corneal Injury Model via Ocular Microenvironment Reconstruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1