External validation of inter-reader reliability of the Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system following focal cryoablation and focal high-intensity focused ultrasound.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11513-4
Michael C Ivey, Sriram Deivasigamani, Srinath Kotamarti, Mahdi Mottaghi, Alireza Ghoreifi, Eric S Adams, Hasan Jhaveri, Cary N Robertson, Danielle E Kruse, Kevin R Kalisz, Daniele Marin, Sarah P Thomas, Thomas J Polascik, Rajan T Gupta
{"title":"External validation of inter-reader reliability of the Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system following focal cryoablation and focal high-intensity focused ultrasound.","authors":"Michael C Ivey, Sriram Deivasigamani, Srinath Kotamarti, Mahdi Mottaghi, Alireza Ghoreifi, Eric S Adams, Hasan Jhaveri, Cary N Robertson, Danielle E Kruse, Kevin R Kalisz, Daniele Marin, Sarah P Thomas, Thomas J Polascik, Rajan T Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11513-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The efficacy of focal therapy (FT) has improved with the use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for lesion identification, though standardized mpMRI reporting post-FT is lacking. The Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system was recently introduced to standardize mpMRI interpretation for local recurrence post-FT. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance and inter-reader reliability of PI-FAB following cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) modalities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-institution study included all patients treated with FT from 2007 to 2023 with available follow-up mpMRI and subsequent prostate biopsy. Three fellowship-trained radiologists scored these images using the PI-FAB system. The primary objective was inter-reader agreeability of PI-FAB scores, and the secondary objective assessed performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>91 patients with 113 mpMRI exams (95 post-cryotherapy; 18 post-HIFU) were reviewed. There was substantial agreement between the readers (Fleiss' Kappa (κ): 0.71, p < 0.001; Gwet AC2: 0.70, p < 0.03). A PI-FAB score 3 had a significant ability to rule-in csPCa with high specificity (88%, 86%, and 93% per reader, respectively), and PI-FAB score 1 had high sensitivity to rule out csPCa (88%, 78%, and 84% per reader, respectively) in surveillance imaging (14-16 months median follow-up).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that the PI-FAB scoring system can be effectively used to evaluate mpMRI recurrence post-FT, with substantial inter-reader reliability and high specificity for predicting in-field clinically significant prostate cancer recurrence post-cryotherapy and HIFU. Larger, multi-institutional studies are essential to confirm PI-FAB's utility in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question There is no widely accepted and validated standardized scoring system to predict the local recurrence of clinically significant prostate cancer after focal therapy with ablative modalities. Findings The Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system effectively predicts in-field recurrence of prostate cancer after focal therapy with substantial inter-reader reliability and specificity. Clinical relevance As patient requests for focal therapy to treat localized low- to- intermediate risk prostate cancer become more common, based on its performance metrics, PI-FAB will aid in identifying in-field recurrence within this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"7004-7012"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11513-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The efficacy of focal therapy (FT) has improved with the use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for lesion identification, though standardized mpMRI reporting post-FT is lacking. The Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system was recently introduced to standardize mpMRI interpretation for local recurrence post-FT. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance and inter-reader reliability of PI-FAB following cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) modalities.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, single-institution study included all patients treated with FT from 2007 to 2023 with available follow-up mpMRI and subsequent prostate biopsy. Three fellowship-trained radiologists scored these images using the PI-FAB system. The primary objective was inter-reader agreeability of PI-FAB scores, and the secondary objective assessed performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive value.

Results: 91 patients with 113 mpMRI exams (95 post-cryotherapy; 18 post-HIFU) were reviewed. There was substantial agreement between the readers (Fleiss' Kappa (κ): 0.71, p < 0.001; Gwet AC2: 0.70, p < 0.03). A PI-FAB score 3 had a significant ability to rule-in csPCa with high specificity (88%, 86%, and 93% per reader, respectively), and PI-FAB score 1 had high sensitivity to rule out csPCa (88%, 78%, and 84% per reader, respectively) in surveillance imaging (14-16 months median follow-up).

Conclusions: Our study suggests that the PI-FAB scoring system can be effectively used to evaluate mpMRI recurrence post-FT, with substantial inter-reader reliability and high specificity for predicting in-field clinically significant prostate cancer recurrence post-cryotherapy and HIFU. Larger, multi-institutional studies are essential to confirm PI-FAB's utility in clinical practice.

Key points: Question There is no widely accepted and validated standardized scoring system to predict the local recurrence of clinically significant prostate cancer after focal therapy with ablative modalities. Findings The Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system effectively predicts in-field recurrence of prostate cancer after focal therapy with substantial inter-reader reliability and specificity. Clinical relevance As patient requests for focal therapy to treat localized low- to- intermediate risk prostate cancer become more common, based on its performance metrics, PI-FAB will aid in identifying in-field recurrence within this patient population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局灶冷冻消融和局灶高强度聚焦超声后前列腺成像(PI-FAB)评分系统阅读器间可靠性的外部验证。
目的:病灶治疗(FT)的疗效随着多参数MRI (mpMRI)用于病灶识别而提高,尽管缺乏标准化的mpMRI报告。最近引入了局灶消融后前列腺成像(PI-FAB)评分系统,以规范ft后局部复发的mpMRI解释。本研究评估PI-FAB在冷冻消融和高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)模式下的诊断性能和读取器间可靠性。材料和方法:这项回顾性的单机构研究纳入了2007年至2023年接受FT治疗的所有患者,并进行了mpMRI随访和前列腺活检。三位接受过奖学金培训的放射科医生使用PI-FAB系统对这些图像进行评分。主要目标是PI-FAB评分的读者间可接受性,次要目标评估表现指标,包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果:91例患者行mpMRI检查113次(冷冻治疗后95次;回顾了18例hifu后病例。结论:我们的研究表明PI-FAB评分系统可以有效地用于评估ft后mpMRI复发,具有较高的读者间可靠性和高特异性,可预测冷冻治疗和HIFU后现场临床显著性前列腺癌复发。要确认PI-FAB在临床实践中的应用,更大规模、多机构的研究是必不可少的。目前还没有一个被广泛接受和验证的标准化评分系统来预测具有临床意义的前列腺癌灶性消融治疗后的局部复发。发现局灶消融后前列腺成像(PI-FAB)评分系统可有效预测局灶治疗后前列腺癌的现场复发,具有较高的读者间可靠性和特异性。随着患者要求局灶治疗局部低至中危前列腺癌变得越来越普遍,基于其表现指标,PI-FAB将有助于识别该患者群体中的现场复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Validation of magnetic resonance imaging for quantification of intrapancreatic fat deposition using phantom and histologic comparators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Negligible impact of perifissural nodules in an AI-first reader workflow from UK lung screening trial. Convolutional neural networks in paediatric fracture detection: pooled evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Between automation and alienation: rethinking AI's role in radiologist well-being. Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Potential role of breast MRI to identify patients with high-risk lesions who might avoid surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1