Impact of overall major oncologic surgery volume on outcomes in esophagogastrectomies with intrathoracic anastomosis.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1007/s00423-025-03684-x
Simone Guadagni, Annalisa Comandatore, Niccolò Furbetta, Gregorio Di Franco, Bianca Bechini, Filippo Vagelli, Niccolò Ramacciotti, Raffaele Gaeta, Luca Emanuele Pollina, Matteo Palmeri, Giulio Di Candio, Luca Morelli
{"title":"Impact of overall major oncologic surgery volume on outcomes in esophagogastrectomies with intrathoracic anastomosis.","authors":"Simone Guadagni, Annalisa Comandatore, Niccolò Furbetta, Gregorio Di Franco, Bianca Bechini, Filippo Vagelli, Niccolò Ramacciotti, Raffaele Gaeta, Luca Emanuele Pollina, Matteo Palmeri, Giulio Di Candio, Luca Morelli","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03684-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High case volumes for specific surgeries including the treatment of esophagogastric junction and distal esophageal cancer are frequently emphasized in literature to achieve better outcomes. However, recent studies have suggested that a cumulative volume of major oncologic surgeries (MOSs) can positively impact outcomes for single procedures even if below their specific thresholds. This study aimed to report outcomes from esophagogastrectomies with intrathoracic anastomosis (EGs-ITA) from a surgical unit that handles a high volume of other MOSs despite lower volumes for EGs-ITA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from all patients undergoing EGs-ITA from January 2013 to June 2023 were collected from an institutional database and retrospectively analyzed. Additionally, data on the volume of all MOSs performed in the same 10-year period were retrieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 32 patients, averaging three EGs-ITA performed annually. The anastomotic leak rate was 6.2%. The median hospital stay was 12 days, and 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 3.1% and 6.2%, respectively. The mean harvested lymph nodes were 26.3 ± 10.2. Re-admission and locoregional recurrence occurred in 6.2% and 9.3% of patients, respectively. During the study period, the surgical team managed over 400 MOSs annually.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exposure to high volume and broad range of MOSs appears beneficial for achieving favorable outcomes in esophagogastric junction and distal esophageal cancer surgeries, even in centers with lower volumes of these specific procedures. This finding underscores the potential for excellent surgical results in settings with substantial overall volumes in major oncologic procedures, as an alternative to high-volume specialization in a single surgery type.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03684-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High case volumes for specific surgeries including the treatment of esophagogastric junction and distal esophageal cancer are frequently emphasized in literature to achieve better outcomes. However, recent studies have suggested that a cumulative volume of major oncologic surgeries (MOSs) can positively impact outcomes for single procedures even if below their specific thresholds. This study aimed to report outcomes from esophagogastrectomies with intrathoracic anastomosis (EGs-ITA) from a surgical unit that handles a high volume of other MOSs despite lower volumes for EGs-ITA.

Methods: Data from all patients undergoing EGs-ITA from January 2013 to June 2023 were collected from an institutional database and retrospectively analyzed. Additionally, data on the volume of all MOSs performed in the same 10-year period were retrieved.

Results: This study included 32 patients, averaging three EGs-ITA performed annually. The anastomotic leak rate was 6.2%. The median hospital stay was 12 days, and 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 3.1% and 6.2%, respectively. The mean harvested lymph nodes were 26.3 ± 10.2. Re-admission and locoregional recurrence occurred in 6.2% and 9.3% of patients, respectively. During the study period, the surgical team managed over 400 MOSs annually.

Conclusion: Exposure to high volume and broad range of MOSs appears beneficial for achieving favorable outcomes in esophagogastric junction and distal esophageal cancer surgeries, even in centers with lower volumes of these specific procedures. This finding underscores the potential for excellent surgical results in settings with substantial overall volumes in major oncologic procedures, as an alternative to high-volume specialization in a single surgery type.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
总体肿瘤大手术量对食管胃切除术胸内吻合预后的影响。
背景:文献中经常强调特定手术的高病例量,包括治疗食管胃交界处和远端食管癌,以获得更好的结果。然而,最近的研究表明,即使低于特定阈值,大型肿瘤手术(MOSs)的累积量也会对单次手术的结果产生积极影响。本研究旨在报道食管胃切除术胸内吻合术(EGs-ITA)的结果,该手术单元处理大量其他MOSs,尽管EGs-ITA的体积较小。方法:从一个机构数据库中收集2013年1月至2023年6月接受EGs-ITA治疗的所有患者的数据并进行回顾性分析。此外,还检索了同一10年期间所有MOSs的体积数据。结果:本研究纳入32例患者,平均每年进行3次EGs-ITA。吻合口漏率为6.2%。中位住院时间为12天,30天和90天死亡率分别为3.1%和6.2%。平均切除淋巴结26.3±10.2个。再次入院和局部复发的发生率分别为6.2%和9.3%。在研究期间,外科团队每年处理超过400例MOSs。结论:在食管胃交界和远端食管癌手术中,暴露于大容量和大范围的MOSs有利于获得良好的结果,即使在这些特定手术的容量较低的中心也是如此。这一发现强调了在主要肿瘤手术中具有大量总体容量的环境中,作为单一手术类型的高容量专业化的替代方案,具有出色的手术效果的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Routine jejunostomy feeding after esophagectomy reduces early weight loss: a cohort study. Risk and protective factors for anastomotic insufficiency in elective colon and rectal cancer resections - a multivariate analysis with over 700 patients. A National survey of surgeons' perspectives on the treatment of adults with acute appendicitis. Stump refashioning technique in lower limb osseointegration. Bilateral internal jugular vein (BIJV) sampling during surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) - scoping review of evidence and search for an optimal definition for lateralisation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1