A systematic review and meta-analysis of alpha-adrenergic antagonists for the treatment of pain in chronic prostatitis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY World Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s00345-025-05575-8
Anthony Carona, David Jacobson, Charles Hildebolt, Kevin Rowland
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of alpha-adrenergic antagonists for the treatment of pain in chronic prostatitis.","authors":"Anthony Carona, David Jacobson, Charles Hildebolt, Kevin Rowland","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05575-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a debilitating condition affecting 2-10% of men globally. Its symptoms, including pelvic pain, urinary problems, and reduced quality of life, vary widely. Despite extensive research, a definitive treatment remains elusive. Alpha-adrenergic antagonists are frequently used to manage urinary symptoms, while analgesics are employed for pain. However, the long-term efficacy of alpha-adrenergic antagonists for pelvic pain requires further investigation. CP/CPPS places a significant burden on healthcare systems and the economy. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of alpha-adrenergic antagonists in reducing pain symptoms in men with CP/CPPS compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of alpha-adrenergic antagonists for the treatment of pain in CP/CPPS was conducted and captured all available studies (n = 680). After application of exclusion criteria, five studies were identified as suitable for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four papers consisting of five studies, containing a total of 578 participants, were evaluated. The combined effects found no difference in pain relief between treated and control subjects for the data from the five studies in the meta-analysis (P = 0.106), with the 95% CI for the random effects model containing a value of 0.00.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In adults with CP/CPPS, alpha-adrenergic antagonists were ineffective as monotherapy to treat pain. Further studies are needed to address possible confounding variables for alpha-adrenergic antagonist efficacy. These findings suggest that alpha-adrenergic antagonists as monotherapy are not effective for pain reduction in CP/CPPS and highlight the need for further research to explore combination therapies or other treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05575-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a debilitating condition affecting 2-10% of men globally. Its symptoms, including pelvic pain, urinary problems, and reduced quality of life, vary widely. Despite extensive research, a definitive treatment remains elusive. Alpha-adrenergic antagonists are frequently used to manage urinary symptoms, while analgesics are employed for pain. However, the long-term efficacy of alpha-adrenergic antagonists for pelvic pain requires further investigation. CP/CPPS places a significant burden on healthcare systems and the economy. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of alpha-adrenergic antagonists in reducing pain symptoms in men with CP/CPPS compared to placebo.

Methods: A systematic search of randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of alpha-adrenergic antagonists for the treatment of pain in CP/CPPS was conducted and captured all available studies (n = 680). After application of exclusion criteria, five studies were identified as suitable for inclusion.

Results: Four papers consisting of five studies, containing a total of 578 participants, were evaluated. The combined effects found no difference in pain relief between treated and control subjects for the data from the five studies in the meta-analysis (P = 0.106), with the 95% CI for the random effects model containing a value of 0.00.

Conclusion: In adults with CP/CPPS, alpha-adrenergic antagonists were ineffective as monotherapy to treat pain. Further studies are needed to address possible confounding variables for alpha-adrenergic antagonist efficacy. These findings suggest that alpha-adrenergic antagonists as monotherapy are not effective for pain reduction in CP/CPPS and highlight the need for further research to explore combination therapies or other treatment modalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统回顾和荟萃分析α -肾上腺素能拮抗剂治疗慢性前列腺炎疼痛。
背景:慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)是一种影响全球2-10%男性的衰弱性疾病。其症状包括盆腔疼痛、泌尿系统问题和生活质量下降,差异很大。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但最终的治疗方法仍然难以捉摸。肾上腺素能拮抗剂常用于治疗泌尿系统症状,而止痛剂用于治疗疼痛。然而,α -肾上腺素能拮抗剂治疗盆腔疼痛的长期疗效有待进一步研究。CP/CPPS给医疗保健系统和经济带来了沉重的负担。本系统综述旨在评价与安慰剂相比,α -肾上腺素能拮抗剂在减轻CP/CPPS患者疼痛症状方面的有效性。方法:系统检索随机、安慰剂对照试验,评估α -肾上腺素能拮抗剂治疗CP/CPPS疼痛的有效性,并收集所有可用的研究(n = 680)。应用排除标准后,确定了5项研究适合纳入。结果:四篇论文包括五项研究,共包含578名参与者。综合效应发现,在meta分析的5项研究数据中,治疗组和对照组的疼痛缓解没有差异(P = 0.106),随机效应模型的95% CI为0.00。结论:在CP/CPPS成人患者中,α -肾上腺素能拮抗剂作为单一疗法治疗疼痛无效。需要进一步的研究来解决α -肾上腺素能拮抗剂疗效的可能混淆变量。这些发现表明,α -肾上腺素能拮抗剂作为单一疗法对CP/CPPS的疼痛减轻无效,并强调需要进一步研究探索联合疗法或其他治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
期刊最新文献
The role of paclitaxel-coated balloons in treating ureteral or anastomotic strictures: current evidence and future directions from EAU endourology. Analysis of functional urological surgery trends 2013-2024 in England using the HES database. Global, regional, and national burden of urolithiasis, 1992-2021: analysis of data from the global burden of disease study 2021. Impact of a robotic-assisted transperineal biopsy platform on pathologic upgrading and downgrading at prostatectomy. Longitudinal urodynamic changes and UTI risk factors in neurogenic bladder patients using clean intermittent catheterization: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1