Impact of iso-dose levels on pre-treatment quality assurance in volumetric modulated arc therapy.

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s12194-025-00902-5
Sumanta Manna, Sanjib Gayen, Sonal Varshney
{"title":"Impact of iso-dose levels on pre-treatment quality assurance in volumetric modulated arc therapy.","authors":"Sumanta Manna, Sanjib Gayen, Sonal Varshney","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00902-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current standard of modern radiotherapy pre-treatment evaluation of dose distributions measured using gamma pass percentage is the predominant metric for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA). The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of the different dose levels for three different gamma criteria in various anatomical sites. Retrospectively selected 120 VMAT plans of the brain, head and neck, thorax, and pelvic sites were considered for this study. Quality assurance plans were created and measurements were done using PTW Octavius 4D phantom. Three different gamma criteria were used to evaluate different dose levels' volume gamma passing rates. The maximum gamma passing rate for all dose levels except 100% with a 3%/3 mm criterion was observed for the pelvis site. A significant variation in dose levels was observed with the 3%/2 mm gamma criteria for head and neck sites, particularly above the 85% dose level compared to other anatomical sites. Using 2%/2 mm gamma criteria, there was a rapid fall in the gamma passing rate and all the dose levels showed a significant variation among different sites. This study demonstrated significant variations in gamma passing rates across anatomical sites and dose levels, emphasizing the importance of tailored QA protocols. The findings underscore the need for site-specific action limits and highlight the sensitivity of stricter gamma criteria for detecting errors in complex treatment plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"505-513"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00902-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current standard of modern radiotherapy pre-treatment evaluation of dose distributions measured using gamma pass percentage is the predominant metric for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA). The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of the different dose levels for three different gamma criteria in various anatomical sites. Retrospectively selected 120 VMAT plans of the brain, head and neck, thorax, and pelvic sites were considered for this study. Quality assurance plans were created and measurements were done using PTW Octavius 4D phantom. Three different gamma criteria were used to evaluate different dose levels' volume gamma passing rates. The maximum gamma passing rate for all dose levels except 100% with a 3%/3 mm criterion was observed for the pelvis site. A significant variation in dose levels was observed with the 3%/2 mm gamma criteria for head and neck sites, particularly above the 85% dose level compared to other anatomical sites. Using 2%/2 mm gamma criteria, there was a rapid fall in the gamma passing rate and all the dose levels showed a significant variation among different sites. This study demonstrated significant variations in gamma passing rates across anatomical sites and dose levels, emphasizing the importance of tailored QA protocols. The findings underscore the need for site-specific action limits and highlight the sensitivity of stricter gamma criteria for detecting errors in complex treatment plans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等剂量水平对体积调节电弧治疗前质量保证的影响。
现代放射治疗前剂量分布评估的现行标准使用伽玛通过百分比测量是患者特异性质量保证(PSQA)的主要指标。本研究的目的是分析不同剂量水平对不同解剖部位的三种不同γ标准的影响。回顾性选择了120个脑、头颈、胸部和骨盆部位的VMAT图,用于本研究。制定了质量保证计划,并使用PTW Octavius 4D幻影进行了测量。采用三种不同的伽玛标准评价不同剂量水平的体积伽玛通过率。在骨盆部位,除了100%的3%/ 3mm标准外,所有剂量水平的最大伽马通过率都被观察到。以3%/ 2mm伽玛标准观察到头颈部部位的剂量水平有显著差异,特别是与其他解剖部位相比,高于85%的剂量水平。使用2%/ 2mm的伽马标准,伽马通过率迅速下降,所有剂量水平在不同部位表现出显著差异。该研究表明,不同解剖部位和剂量水平的伽马通过率存在显著差异,强调了定制QA方案的重要性。研究结果强调了对特定部位的作用限制的必要性,并强调了在复杂治疗计划中检测错误的更严格的伽玛标准的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
期刊最新文献
Encapsulated configuration of a flexible transparent adhesive bolus to improve surface conformity and skin safety in post-mastectomy radiation therapy. Development of a 3D-printed canine head phantom for veterinary radiotherapy. Contemporary strategies for dose optimization in pediatric congenital heart disease CT: size-specific acquisition and detector-level advances. Basic characteristics of do-it-yourself dosimeter in general radiography system. Comprehensive estimation of patient radiation exposure in hip joint surgery using a tissue-equivalent phantom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1