Application of a training program system centered on job competency in the standardized training of new nurses.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02970-9
Fenglian Luo, Jun Cai, Haixia Ma, Xia Wu, Yue Xia
{"title":"Application of a training program system centered on job competency in the standardized training of new nurses.","authors":"Fenglian Luo, Jun Cai, Haixia Ma, Xia Wu, Yue Xia","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02970-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the effectiveness of a job competency-centered training system for newly hired nurses during their induction training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The control group included 41 nurses who underwent traditional teaching models from 2020 to 2021. The observation group consisted of 39 nurses trained from 2022 to 2024, focusing on job competency. This training covered basic theoretical knowledge, operational skills, professional conduct, communication, emergency response, and comprehensive nursing care skills. Post-training evaluations included competency, theoretical and practical examination scores, Nursing-Mini-CEX excellence rates, patient satisfaction, and humanistic care abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group achieved higher scores across all assessment areas compared to the control group. Theoretical examination scores were (95.987 ± 2.129) vs. (94.756 ± 2.773), practical scores were (96.987 ± 1.254) vs. (95.902 ± 1.855), and comprehensive scores were (96.487 ± 1.234) vs. (95.329 ± 1.841). Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) scores were (8.795 ± 0.409) for the observation group and (8.439 ± 0.594) for the control group. In job competency dimensions, the observation group scored: professional quality (10), general work capability (34.718 ± 0.916), communication and coordination (13.949 ± 0.605), proactive management (13.974 ± 0.778), patient safety (14.128 ± 0.767), health education (8.564 ± 0.552), and overall competency (95.333 ± 1.420). Conversely, the control group scored: professional quality (10), general work capability (34.268 ± 0.708), communication and coordination (13.634 ± 0.733), proactive management (13.634 ± 0.733), patient safety (13.780 ± 0.725), health education (8.293 ± 0.599), and overall competency (93.610 ± 1.481). For humanistic care ability, the observation group had cognitive (66.41 ± 3.362), courage (65.923 ± 3.115), and patience dimensions (60.308 ± 3.686), totaling (192.641 ± 5.451). The control group's scores were cognitive (64.488 ± 3.543), courage (64.317 ± 3.446), and patience (57.902 ± 5.004), totaling (186.707 ± 8.143). Patient satisfaction rates were 100% in the observation group and 95.12% in the control group. Nurses trained under the competency-based model showed significant enhancements in job competency, patient satisfaction, and humanistic care compared to those trained under traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The job competency-centered induction training model significantly enhances new nurses' job competence, theoretical and practical assessment scores, humanistic care abilities, and patient satisfaction compared to traditional models.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"358"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02970-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the effectiveness of a job competency-centered training system for newly hired nurses during their induction training.

Methods: The control group included 41 nurses who underwent traditional teaching models from 2020 to 2021. The observation group consisted of 39 nurses trained from 2022 to 2024, focusing on job competency. This training covered basic theoretical knowledge, operational skills, professional conduct, communication, emergency response, and comprehensive nursing care skills. Post-training evaluations included competency, theoretical and practical examination scores, Nursing-Mini-CEX excellence rates, patient satisfaction, and humanistic care abilities.

Results: The observation group achieved higher scores across all assessment areas compared to the control group. Theoretical examination scores were (95.987 ± 2.129) vs. (94.756 ± 2.773), practical scores were (96.987 ± 1.254) vs. (95.902 ± 1.855), and comprehensive scores were (96.487 ± 1.234) vs. (95.329 ± 1.841). Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) scores were (8.795 ± 0.409) for the observation group and (8.439 ± 0.594) for the control group. In job competency dimensions, the observation group scored: professional quality (10), general work capability (34.718 ± 0.916), communication and coordination (13.949 ± 0.605), proactive management (13.974 ± 0.778), patient safety (14.128 ± 0.767), health education (8.564 ± 0.552), and overall competency (95.333 ± 1.420). Conversely, the control group scored: professional quality (10), general work capability (34.268 ± 0.708), communication and coordination (13.634 ± 0.733), proactive management (13.634 ± 0.733), patient safety (13.780 ± 0.725), health education (8.293 ± 0.599), and overall competency (93.610 ± 1.481). For humanistic care ability, the observation group had cognitive (66.41 ± 3.362), courage (65.923 ± 3.115), and patience dimensions (60.308 ± 3.686), totaling (192.641 ± 5.451). The control group's scores were cognitive (64.488 ± 3.543), courage (64.317 ± 3.446), and patience (57.902 ± 5.004), totaling (186.707 ± 8.143). Patient satisfaction rates were 100% in the observation group and 95.12% in the control group. Nurses trained under the competency-based model showed significant enhancements in job competency, patient satisfaction, and humanistic care compared to those trained under traditional methods.

Conclusion: The job competency-centered induction training model significantly enhances new nurses' job competence, theoretical and practical assessment scores, humanistic care abilities, and patient satisfaction compared to traditional models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新护士的标准化培训中应用以工作能力为中心的培训计划系统。
目的:探讨以岗位胜任力为中心的培训体系在新入职护士入职培训中的效果。方法:对照组41名护士,于2020 ~ 2021年采用传统教学模式。观察组为2022 - 2024年培训的39名护士,重点关注岗位胜任力。培训内容包括基本理论知识、操作技能、职业操守、沟通、应急反应和综合护理技能。培训后评估包括胜任力、理论和实践考试成绩、Nursing-Mini-CEX优秀率、患者满意度和人文关怀能力。结果:观察组在各评估领域的得分均高于对照组。理论考试得分为(95.987±2.129)比(94.756±2.773)分,实践考试得分为(96.987±1.254)比(95.902±1.855)分,综合考试得分为(96.487±1.234)比(95.329±1.841)分。观察组Mini-CEX评分为(8.795±0.409)分,对照组为(8.439±0.594)分。在工作胜任力维度上,观察组得分为:专业素质(10分)、一般工作能力(34.718±0.916分)、沟通协调能力(13.949±0.605分)、主动管理能力(13.974±0.778分)、患者安全(14.128±0.767分)、健康教育能力(8.564±0.552分)、综合胜任力(95.333±1.420分)。对照组的得分为:专业素质(10分)、一般工作能力(34.268±0.708分)、沟通协调能力(13.634±0.733分)、主动管理能力(13.634±0.733分)、患者安全(13.780±0.725分)、健康教育(8.293±0.599分)、综合能力(93.610±1.481分)。在人文关怀能力维度上,观察组患者认知(66.41±3.362)、勇气(65.923±3.115)、耐心(60.308±3.686),共(192.641±5.451)项。对照组患者认知(64.488±3.543)、勇气(64.317±3.446)、耐心(57.902±5.004)分,总分为(186.707±8.143)分。观察组患者满意率为100%,对照组为95.12%。与传统方法培训的护士相比,胜任力培训的护士在工作胜任力、患者满意度和人文关怀方面均有显著提高。结论:与传统模式相比,以工作能力为中心的入职培训模式显著提高了新护士的工作能力、理论和实践评估得分、人文关怀能力和患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Development of a multi-skill, haptic-supported virtual reality simulation for first-year nursing students: a pilot study. Correction: Artificial intelligence-assisted nursing care: a concept analysis using Walker and Avant approach. Humanization of nursing care in hospitalized patients with non-communicable diseases: a phenomenological qualitative study. Determination of contraceptive knowledge, attitude, and behavior among nursing students in Northern Cyprus: a cross-sectional study. Turkish neonatal nurses' knowledge regarding the enteral feeding in preterm infants: a descriptive, cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1