Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.

IF 0.6 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-09-03 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1159/000540702
Sofia Bizarro Ponte, Joana Oliveira, Andreia Rei, Paulo Salgueiro
{"title":"Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sofia Bizarro Ponte, Joana Oliveira, Andreia Rei, Paulo Salgueiro","doi":"10.1159/000540702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) in cirrhotic patients is similar to that of general population, varying between 21% and 79%. Managing this clinical condition in these patients is challenging, due to the need to differentiate between bleeding originating from hemorrhoids or anorectal varices, and the unique hemostatic balance of each patient, which can lead to a decompensation of liver function and subsequently increase the anesthetic risk. To date, there are no systematic reviews specifically addressing this topic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were retrieved from three electronic databases. Efficacy (symptomatic improvement, patient satisfaction, quality of life improvement, disease recurrence/need for surgery and/or hemorrhoidal prolapse reduction in anoscopy) and safety (reported adverse events) outcomes were evaluated. Data from each study were initially described individually, followed by a comparative analysis for procedures applied in multiple studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included - 1 randomized clinical trial (RCT), 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, and 2 case series. The considered techniques encompassed rubber band ligation (RBL), injection sclerotherapy (IS) using 3 agents - aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA), ethanolamine oleate 5% (EAO), or N-butyl-cyanoacrylate, hemorrhoidopexy, and emborrhoid technique. RBL showed great symptomatic improvement and patient satisfaction in 63% and 73% of patients, respectively, and in 90% was associated with one-grade prolapse reduction after only one session. The most frequently reported adverse events included pain (16%) and ulceration/fissure (1-17%). Concerning IS, symptomatic improvement was observed in all patients. Recurrence rates varied with the agent used (EAO: 13% at 12 months; N-butyl-cyanoacrylate: 40% at 12 months; ALTA: 18% at 5 years), and 86.7% of patients exhibited more than one-grade reduction after the initial session. The most frequent adverse event was pain (EAO: 63%; N-butyl-cyanoacrylate: 60%). Stapled hemorrhoidopexy resulted in symptomatic improvement in all patients, although associated with a recurrence rate of 25% within 4 months. With an emborrhoid technique, 80% of the patients showed clinical improvement at a 3-month follow-up, without significant adverse events, at the cost of a 40% recurrence rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All the treatment methods assessed in the included studies appear to be effective and safe in cirrhotic patients. This assumption challenges previous concerns regarding significant bleeding after office-based procedures like RBL in this population. Future research should prioritize RCT to thoroughly assess the management of HD in these patients, particularly addressing polidocanol foam sclerotherapy, a minimally invasive technique that has previously been shown to be more effective than RBL in the general population and in patients with bleeding disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":51838,"journal":{"name":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"32 2","pages":"95-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) in cirrhotic patients is similar to that of general population, varying between 21% and 79%. Managing this clinical condition in these patients is challenging, due to the need to differentiate between bleeding originating from hemorrhoids or anorectal varices, and the unique hemostatic balance of each patient, which can lead to a decompensation of liver function and subsequently increase the anesthetic risk. To date, there are no systematic reviews specifically addressing this topic.

Methods: This was a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were retrieved from three electronic databases. Efficacy (symptomatic improvement, patient satisfaction, quality of life improvement, disease recurrence/need for surgery and/or hemorrhoidal prolapse reduction in anoscopy) and safety (reported adverse events) outcomes were evaluated. Data from each study were initially described individually, followed by a comparative analysis for procedures applied in multiple studies.

Results: Six studies were included - 1 randomized clinical trial (RCT), 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, and 2 case series. The considered techniques encompassed rubber band ligation (RBL), injection sclerotherapy (IS) using 3 agents - aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA), ethanolamine oleate 5% (EAO), or N-butyl-cyanoacrylate, hemorrhoidopexy, and emborrhoid technique. RBL showed great symptomatic improvement and patient satisfaction in 63% and 73% of patients, respectively, and in 90% was associated with one-grade prolapse reduction after only one session. The most frequently reported adverse events included pain (16%) and ulceration/fissure (1-17%). Concerning IS, symptomatic improvement was observed in all patients. Recurrence rates varied with the agent used (EAO: 13% at 12 months; N-butyl-cyanoacrylate: 40% at 12 months; ALTA: 18% at 5 years), and 86.7% of patients exhibited more than one-grade reduction after the initial session. The most frequent adverse event was pain (EAO: 63%; N-butyl-cyanoacrylate: 60%). Stapled hemorrhoidopexy resulted in symptomatic improvement in all patients, although associated with a recurrence rate of 25% within 4 months. With an emborrhoid technique, 80% of the patients showed clinical improvement at a 3-month follow-up, without significant adverse events, at the cost of a 40% recurrence rate.

Conclusions: All the treatment methods assessed in the included studies appear to be effective and safe in cirrhotic patients. This assumption challenges previous concerns regarding significant bleeding after office-based procedures like RBL in this population. Future research should prioritize RCT to thoroughly assess the management of HD in these patients, particularly addressing polidocanol foam sclerotherapy, a minimally invasive technique that has previously been shown to be more effective than RBL in the general population and in patients with bleeding disorders.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝硬化患者的痔疮治疗:系统回顾
肝硬化患者的痔疮病(HD)发病率与一般人群相似,在21%至79%之间变化。管理这些患者的这种临床状况具有挑战性,因为需要区分痔疮或肛肠静脉曲张引起的出血,以及每个患者独特的止血平衡,这可能导致肝功能失代偿,随后增加麻醉风险。到目前为止,还没有专门针对这一主题的系统综述。方法:这是一项遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南的系统评价。研究从三个电子数据库中检索。评估疗效(症状改善、患者满意度、生活质量改善、疾病复发/手术需要和/或肛门镜检查中痔疮脱垂减少)和安全性(报告的不良事件)结果。最初分别对每项研究的数据进行了描述,然后对应用于多项研究的程序进行了比较分析。结果:共纳入6项研究:1项随机临床试验(RCT), 2项前瞻性队列研究,1项回顾性队列研究,2项病例系列研究。考虑的技术包括橡皮筋结扎(RBL),注射硬化疗法(IS),使用3种药物-硫酸铝钾和单宁酸(ALTA), 5%油酸乙醇胺(EAO)或n -丁基氰基丙烯酸酯,痔疮固定术和痔疮技术。RBL分别有63%和73%的患者表现出明显的症状改善和患者满意度,90%的患者在一次治疗后脱垂降低一级。最常见的不良事件包括疼痛(16%)和溃疡/裂(1-17%)。关于IS,所有患者的症状均有改善。复发率因所用药物而异(EAO: 12个月时为13%;氰基丙烯酸正丁酯:12个月时40%;ALTA: 18%(5年),86.7%的患者在初次治疗后表现出1级以上的降低。最常见的不良事件是疼痛(EAO: 63%;N-butyl-cyanoacrylate: 60%)。痔钉固定术使所有患者的症状得到改善,但在4个月内复发率为25%。使用痔疮技术,80%的患者在3个月的随访中表现出临床改善,没有明显的不良事件,代价是40%的复发率。结论:纳入的研究中评估的所有治疗方法对肝硬化患者似乎都是有效和安全的。这一假设挑战了先前对该人群在RBL等基于办公室的手术后出现严重出血的担忧。未来的研究应优先考虑RCT,以彻底评估这些患者对HD的管理,特别是针对polidocanol泡沫硬化疗法,这是一种微创技术,先前已被证明在普通人群和出血性疾病患者中比RBL更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
62
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology'' (formerly Jornal Português de Gastrenterologia), founded in 1994, is the official publication of Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia (Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology), Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (Portuguese Society of Digestive Endoscopy) and Associação Portuguesa para o Estudo do Fígado (Portuguese Association for the Study of the Liver). The journal publishes clinical and basic research articles on Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy, Hepatology and related topics. Review articles, clinical case studies, images, letters to the editor and other articles such as recommendations or papers on gastroenterology clinical practice are also considered. Only articles written in English are accepted.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Closure Techniques for Perforations, Leaks, and Fistulae: Review Article. Intestinal Subocclusion - An Unexpected Diagnosis in a Common Clinical Presentation: A Case Report. Psychological State Experienced by Gastroenterologists following Endoscopic Adverse Events: Insights from a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study. Preemptive Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Variceal Bleeding: A Real-World Study in a Tertiary Hospital. Ileocolic Intussusception Secondary to B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1