Association of age with extubation failure in neurocritical intensive care unit patients––Insight from an international prospective study named ENIO

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of critical care Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155067
Relin van Vliet , David M.P. van Meenen , Chiara Robba , Raphaël Cinotti , Karim Asehnoune , Robert D. Stevens , Denise Battaglini , Shaurya Taran , Mathieu van der Jagt , Fabio Silvio Taccone , Frederique Paulus , Marcus J. Schultz
{"title":"Association of age with extubation failure in neurocritical intensive care unit patients––Insight from an international prospective study named ENIO","authors":"Relin van Vliet ,&nbsp;David M.P. van Meenen ,&nbsp;Chiara Robba ,&nbsp;Raphaël Cinotti ,&nbsp;Karim Asehnoune ,&nbsp;Robert D. Stevens ,&nbsp;Denise Battaglini ,&nbsp;Shaurya Taran ,&nbsp;Mathieu van der Jagt ,&nbsp;Fabio Silvio Taccone ,&nbsp;Frederique Paulus ,&nbsp;Marcus J. Schultz","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the association of age with extubation failure in neurocritical care patients.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Posthoc analysis of the ‘Extubation strategies in Neuro–Intensive care unit patients and associations with Outcomes (ENIO) study’, an international prospective observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>ENIO was conducted in 73 centers in 18 countries from 2018 to 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>Neurocritical care patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 12 and receiving ventilation<!--> <!-->for at least 24 h were included. We categorized patients into four age groups based on age quartiles.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>This analysis included 1095 patients with a median age of 53 [35 to 65] years. Younger patients were more likely to be admitted with traumatic brain injury, whereas older patients more often had cerebral hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, central nervous infection, or brain malignancies. Extubation failure occurred in 209 (19 %) patients. In the unadjusted analysis, older patients had a higher risk of extubation failure (odds ratio (OR), 1.012 [95 %–confidence interval (CI) 1.004 to 1.021]; <em>P</em> = 0.006). However, after adjusting for confounding factors, the effect of age on extubation failure was no longer significant (OR, 1.008 [0.997 to 1.019]; <em>P</em> = 0.172).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this international cohort of intubated and ventilated neurocritical care patients, after adjusting for baseline covariates and for previously identified risk factors for extubation failure, age was not associated with extubation failure. Age may not be a factor to consider in extubation decisions for brain–injured patients.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>ENIO is registered at <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (study identifier NCT 03400904).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 155067"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125000541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the association of age with extubation failure in neurocritical care patients.

Design

Posthoc analysis of the ‘Extubation strategies in Neuro–Intensive care unit patients and associations with Outcomes (ENIO) study’, an international prospective observational study.

Setting

ENIO was conducted in 73 centers in 18 countries from 2018 to 2020.

Patients

Neurocritical care patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 12 and receiving ventilation for at least 24 h were included. We categorized patients into four age groups based on age quartiles.

Main results

This analysis included 1095 patients with a median age of 53 [35 to 65] years. Younger patients were more likely to be admitted with traumatic brain injury, whereas older patients more often had cerebral hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, central nervous infection, or brain malignancies. Extubation failure occurred in 209 (19 %) patients. In the unadjusted analysis, older patients had a higher risk of extubation failure (odds ratio (OR), 1.012 [95 %–confidence interval (CI) 1.004 to 1.021]; P = 0.006). However, after adjusting for confounding factors, the effect of age on extubation failure was no longer significant (OR, 1.008 [0.997 to 1.019]; P = 0.172).

Conclusions

In this international cohort of intubated and ventilated neurocritical care patients, after adjusting for baseline covariates and for previously identified risk factors for extubation failure, age was not associated with extubation failure. Age may not be a factor to consider in extubation decisions for brain–injured patients.

Registration

ENIO is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (study identifier NCT 03400904).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年龄与神经危重重症监护室患者拔管失败的关系——来自一项名为ENIO的国际前瞻性研究
目的探讨年龄与神经危重症患者拔管失败的关系。设计:一项国际前瞻性观察性研究“神经重症监护病房患者拔管策略及其与结果的关联(ENIO)研究”的后置分析。SettingENIO于2018年至2020年在18个国家的73个中心进行。纳入格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤12分且接受通气至少24小时的神经危重症患者。我们根据年龄四分位数将患者分为四个年龄组。本分析纳入1095例患者,中位年龄53岁[35 ~ 65]岁。年轻患者更容易因外伤性脑损伤入院,而老年患者更常因脑出血、缺血性中风、中枢神经感染或脑恶性肿瘤入院。209例(19%)患者拔管失败。在未经调整的分析中,老年患者拔管失败的风险更高(优势比(OR), 1.012[95%可信区间(CI) 1.004 ~ 1.021];p = 0.006)。然而,在调整混杂因素后,年龄对拔管失败的影响不再显著(OR, 1.008 [0.997 ~ 1.019];p = 0.172)。结论:在这个插管和通气的神经危重症患者的国际队列中,在调整了基线协变量和先前确定的拔管失败危险因素后,年龄与拔管失败无关。年龄可能不是脑损伤患者拔管决定的一个考虑因素。enio已在clinicaltrials.gov注册(研究标识号NCT 03400904)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
期刊最新文献
Immediate "sipping" vs. delayed oral fluid intake after extubation: A randomized controlled trial. Mixed methods evaluation of a digital tool to support the transfer of medication information from ICU to ward. How do experts classify sepsis cases for sepsis surveillance? Lessons learned from a Behavioural Artificial Intelligence Technology (BAIT) approach. Letter to the Editor: "Reversal of antithrombotics in the critically ill: An international online survey". Letter to the Editor: "Risk factors associated with acute kidney injury in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1