Lipoprotein(a) Measurement in Lipoprotein Apheresis: Time to Change?

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Journal of Clinical Apheresis Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1002/jca.70018
Carmen Corciulo, Beatrice Dal Pino, Francesco Sbrana, Federico Bigazzi
{"title":"Lipoprotein(a) Measurement in Lipoprotein Apheresis: Time to Change?","authors":"Carmen Corciulo,&nbsp;Beatrice Dal Pino,&nbsp;Francesco Sbrana,&nbsp;Federico Bigazzi","doi":"10.1002/jca.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The question of standardizing the measurement of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been discussed for many years, but the unavailability of automated methods insensitive to the structural heterogeneity of Lp(a) and the transition to a new unit of measurement have delayed this process. The aim of this study is to compare, in subjects undergoing regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment (31 subjects, mean age 62 ± 11 years, female 7/31), Lp(a) measurements performed using routine polyclonal antibodies with a method that recognizes a single copy of apo(a) per molecule. This pilot study for adopting an assay insensitive to apo(a) size polymorphism showed a good match with the traditional method: correlations between pre-LA and post-LA measures show an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.89 and 0.76, respectively. Despite the interpretative problem caused by adopting different units of measurement, we believe that moving to an assay insensitive to the dimensional variation of apo(a) represents a necessary change to standardize, improve, and extend the accuracy and diagnostic power of Lp(a).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of standardizing the measurement of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been discussed for many years, but the unavailability of automated methods insensitive to the structural heterogeneity of Lp(a) and the transition to a new unit of measurement have delayed this process. The aim of this study is to compare, in subjects undergoing regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment (31 subjects, mean age 62 ± 11 years, female 7/31), Lp(a) measurements performed using routine polyclonal antibodies with a method that recognizes a single copy of apo(a) per molecule. This pilot study for adopting an assay insensitive to apo(a) size polymorphism showed a good match with the traditional method: correlations between pre-LA and post-LA measures show an R2 of 0.89 and 0.76, respectively. Despite the interpretative problem caused by adopting different units of measurement, we believe that moving to an assay insensitive to the dimensional variation of apo(a) represents a necessary change to standardize, improve, and extend the accuracy and diagnostic power of Lp(a).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂蛋白分离术中的脂蛋白(a)测量:何时改变?
关于脂蛋白(a) [Lp(a)]测量标准化的问题已经讨论了很多年,但是无法获得对Lp(a)结构异质性不敏感的自动化方法以及向新的测量单位的过渡推迟了这一进程。本研究的目的是比较在接受常规脂蛋白分离(LA)治疗的受试者(31名受试者,平均年龄62±11岁,女性7/31)中,使用常规多克隆抗体进行的Lp(a)测量,该方法识别每个分子的单个载脂蛋白(a)拷贝。采用对载脂蛋白(a)大小多态性不敏感的检测方法的初步研究显示与传统方法吻合良好:la前和la后测量的相关系数分别为0.89和0.76。尽管采用不同的测量单位造成了解释性问题,但我们认为,转向对载脂蛋白(a)的尺寸变化不敏感的分析代表了标准化、改进和扩展Lp(a)的准确性和诊断能力的必要改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Isovolemic Hemodilution-Red Cell Exchange on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease: A Pilot Study. Issue Information Twenty-Four Cases of Severe ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Treated With Plasma Exchange: A Clinical Analysis and Long-Term Follow-Up Unusual Icteric Discoloration of Single Donor Platelets in Platelet Additive Solution With Container Staining: A Rare Observation Comparative Analysis of Responses From Five Popular Artificial Intelligence Chatbots to the Most Commonly Searched Keywords About Apheresis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1