External Validation of the Clinical Obstetric Comorbidity Index across a Diverse Health System.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1055/a-2572-1727
Adina R Kern-Goldberger, Sindhu K Srinivas, Michael O Harhay, Lisa D Levine
{"title":"External Validation of the Clinical Obstetric Comorbidity Index across a Diverse Health System.","authors":"Adina R Kern-Goldberger, Sindhu K Srinivas, Michael O Harhay, Lisa D Levine","doi":"10.1055/a-2572-1727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinically-modified obstetric comorbidity index (OB-CMI) is a comorbidity-based scoring system that has been validated to predict severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in a single tertiary, academic hospital using an internal SMM definition. We aimed to validate the OB-CMI for the prediction of SMM as defined by the CDC during delivery admissions across a diverse health system.This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating all deliveries in a large health system encompassing academic and community hospitals. Data from 2019 to 2021 were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) and validated with chart review. An OB-CMI score was calculated for each patient using established diagnosis codes and EHR data. The primary outcome was nontransfusion SMM (defined by the CDC) during the delivery admission. Patient characteristics were evaluated by the hospital, and hospital-specific receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and compared.In total, 42,130 deliveries were included with significant differences in all demographic, clinical, and obstetric characteristics across the hospitals including age, BMI, race/ethnicity, insurance type, preterm birth, and preeclampsia rates. Median OB-CMI score and rate of elevated OB-CMI score (≥6) were also significantly different. ROC curves for OB-CMI and SMM for each hospital are noted in the figure with an area under the curve range from 0.77 to 0.83, and no significant differences across hospitals (<i>p</i> = 0.32).In a large cohort of patients delivering across a diverse hospital system, the clinical OB-CMI score similarly predicted SMM despite differences in demographic and clinical characteristics among the hospitals. This validation of the OB-CMI supports the use of this scoring system in variegated clinical settings, which can inform widescale uptake and clinical integration of OB-CMI scoring to improve obstetric risk stratification. · The clinically-modified OB-CMI consistently predicted nontransfusion SMM across multiple hospitals.. · This OB-CMI can be used for obstetric risk stratification across different clinical settings.. · Future research should explore the impact of using the OB-CMI to mitigate risk in clinical practice..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"279-282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2572-1727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clinically-modified obstetric comorbidity index (OB-CMI) is a comorbidity-based scoring system that has been validated to predict severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in a single tertiary, academic hospital using an internal SMM definition. We aimed to validate the OB-CMI for the prediction of SMM as defined by the CDC during delivery admissions across a diverse health system.This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating all deliveries in a large health system encompassing academic and community hospitals. Data from 2019 to 2021 were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) and validated with chart review. An OB-CMI score was calculated for each patient using established diagnosis codes and EHR data. The primary outcome was nontransfusion SMM (defined by the CDC) during the delivery admission. Patient characteristics were evaluated by the hospital, and hospital-specific receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and compared.In total, 42,130 deliveries were included with significant differences in all demographic, clinical, and obstetric characteristics across the hospitals including age, BMI, race/ethnicity, insurance type, preterm birth, and preeclampsia rates. Median OB-CMI score and rate of elevated OB-CMI score (≥6) were also significantly different. ROC curves for OB-CMI and SMM for each hospital are noted in the figure with an area under the curve range from 0.77 to 0.83, and no significant differences across hospitals (p = 0.32).In a large cohort of patients delivering across a diverse hospital system, the clinical OB-CMI score similarly predicted SMM despite differences in demographic and clinical characteristics among the hospitals. This validation of the OB-CMI supports the use of this scoring system in variegated clinical settings, which can inform widescale uptake and clinical integration of OB-CMI scoring to improve obstetric risk stratification. · The clinically-modified OB-CMI consistently predicted nontransfusion SMM across multiple hospitals.. · This OB-CMI can be used for obstetric risk stratification across different clinical settings.. · Future research should explore the impact of using the OB-CMI to mitigate risk in clinical practice..

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床产科合并症指数在不同卫生系统的外部验证。
目的:经临床修改的产科合并症指数(OB-CMI)是一种基于合并症的评分系统,该系统已被验证可用于预测单一三级学术医院使用内部SMM定义的严重产妇发病率(SMM)。我们的目的是验证OB-CMI在不同卫生系统的分娩入院期间预测疾病预防控制中心定义的SMM。研究设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,评估包括学术医院和社区医院在内的大型卫生系统中的所有分娩情况。从电子健康记录(EHR)中提取2019-2021年的数据,并通过图表审查进行验证。使用已建立的诊断代码和EHR数据计算每位患者的OB-CMI评分。主要结局是分娩入院时的非输血SMM(由CDC定义)。由医院评估患者特征,构建医院特异性的接受者-操作者特征(ROC)曲线并进行比较。结果:42,130例分娩在各医院的所有人口统计学、临床和产科特征上存在显著差异,包括年龄、体重指数、种族/民族、保险类型、早产和先兆子痫发生率。(表)。OB-CMI评分中位数和OB-CMI评分升高率(≥6)也有显著差异。各医院OB-CMI和SMM的ROC曲线见图,曲线下面积(AUC)范围为0.77 - 0.83,各医院间无显著差异(p = 0.32)。结论:在不同医院系统的大量患者中,临床OB-CMI评分类似地预测了SMM,尽管医院之间的人口统计学和临床特征存在差异。OB-CMI的验证支持在多样化的临床环境中使用该评分系统,这可以为OB-CMI评分的广泛采用和临床整合提供信息,以改善产科风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Offspring Sex on Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Individuals with Pregestational Diabetes. Utility of Serial Cranial Ultrasound in Preterm Infants. Understanding the Impact of Patent Ductus Arteriosus and Treatment Strategies on Acute Kidney Injury in Preterm Infants. Health Care-Associated Infections following Major Neonatal Surgery in a Resource-Limited Setting: Risk Factors and Outcomes from Southern Tunisia. High Altitude and Duration of Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants: Multicenter Observational Cohort from Latin America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1