Perineural dexamethasone added to peripheral nerve block in knee surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesiology intensive therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.5114/ait/196700
Dmitriy Viderman, Karina Tapinova, Anuar Aryngazin, Mina Aubakirova, Yerkin Abdildin
{"title":"Perineural dexamethasone added to peripheral nerve block in knee surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Dmitriy Viderman, Karina Tapinova, Anuar Aryngazin, Mina Aubakirova, Yerkin Abdildin","doi":"10.5114/ait/196700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of the study was to assess the analgesic effects of dexamethasone (DEX) added to peripheral nerve block in knee surgery. We searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The latest search was done on September 11, 2024. Search terms included knee surgery, regional anesthesia, and DEX. Data extraction, statistical analysis, and risk of bias assessment followed established protocols. Seven RCTs with 551 patients were included. In the DEX 4 mg group, no reduction of pain at rest was found. However, for the DEX 8 mg group, pain management at rest was more effective; the mean difference (MD) with 95% CI was -0.34 [-0.50, -0.18]. For pain with movement, the model favors the DEX 4 mg group (MD with 95% CI was -1.03 [-1.84, -0.22]). Only one study reported the differences in pain intensity scores with movement between the DEX 8 mg and control groups. For morphine consumption, the model did not reveal any reduction in the DEX 4 mg group (MD -0.68 [-1.87, 0.5]) or DEX 8 mg group (MD -10.44 [-23.92, 3.03]). Pain with movement may be reduced with a lower dose, and pain without movement with a higher dose of DEX.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"31-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait/196700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the analgesic effects of dexamethasone (DEX) added to peripheral nerve block in knee surgery. We searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The latest search was done on September 11, 2024. Search terms included knee surgery, regional anesthesia, and DEX. Data extraction, statistical analysis, and risk of bias assessment followed established protocols. Seven RCTs with 551 patients were included. In the DEX 4 mg group, no reduction of pain at rest was found. However, for the DEX 8 mg group, pain management at rest was more effective; the mean difference (MD) with 95% CI was -0.34 [-0.50, -0.18]. For pain with movement, the model favors the DEX 4 mg group (MD with 95% CI was -1.03 [-1.84, -0.22]). Only one study reported the differences in pain intensity scores with movement between the DEX 8 mg and control groups. For morphine consumption, the model did not reveal any reduction in the DEX 4 mg group (MD -0.68 [-1.87, 0.5]) or DEX 8 mg group (MD -10.44 [-23.92, 3.03]). Pain with movement may be reduced with a lower dose, and pain without movement with a higher dose of DEX.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节手术中加入周围神经阻滞的神经周围地塞米松:一项荟萃分析的系统综述。
本研究的目的是评估地塞米松(DEX)加入周围神经阻滞在膝关节手术中的镇痛效果。我们在PubMed和Cochrane系统评价数据库中检索了相关的随机对照试验(RCTs)。最近一次搜索是在2024年9月11日进行的。搜索词包括膝关节手术、区域麻醉和DEX。数据提取、统计分析和偏倚风险评估遵循既定方案。纳入7项随机对照试验,共551例患者。DEX 4 mg组未见静止疼痛减轻。然而,对于dex8 mg组,休息时的疼痛管理更有效;平均差异(MD), 95% CI为-0.34[-0.50,-0.18]。对于伴有运动的疼痛,模型倾向于DEX 4 mg组(MD, 95% CI为-1.03[-1.84,-0.22])。只有一项研究报告了dex8 mg组和对照组在运动时疼痛强度评分的差异。对于吗啡的摄入,模型未显示DEX 4 mg组(MD -0.68[-1.87, 0.5])或DEX 8 mg组(MD -10.44[-23.92, 3.03])有任何减少。低剂量的DEX可减轻活动疼痛,高剂量的DEX可减轻不活动疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of prespinal analgesic techniques for enhancing spinal anesthesia quality in fractured neck of femur: a randomized clinical trial. Association between NT-proBNP and ivabradine in patients after noncardiac surgery: a per-protocol analysis of the PREVENT-MINS study. Exploring Pandora's box: a review of thoracic compartment syndrome. Trends in regional anaesthesia: insights from Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy. Objective monitoring of acute pain and nociception in anaesthesia and intensive care: evidence and applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1