Synapses mediate the effects of different types of stress on working memory: a brain-inspired spiking neural network study.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fncel.2025.1534839
Chengcheng Du, Yinqian Sun, Jihang Wang, Qian Zhang, Yi Zeng
{"title":"Synapses mediate the effects of different types of stress on working memory: a brain-inspired spiking neural network study.","authors":"Chengcheng Du, Yinqian Sun, Jihang Wang, Qian Zhang, Yi Zeng","doi":"10.3389/fncel.2025.1534839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute stress results from sudden short-term events, and individuals need to quickly adjust their physiological and psychological to re-establish balance. Chronic stress, on the other hand, results in long-term physiological and psychological burdens due to the continued existence of stressors, making it difficult for individuals to recover and prone to pathological symptoms. Both types of stress can affect working memory and change cognitive function. In this study, we explored the impact of acute and chronic stress on synaptic modulation using a biologically inspired, data-driven rodent prefrontal neural network model. The model consists of a specific number of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that are connected through AMPA, NMDA, and GABA synapses. The study used a short-term recall to simulate working memory tasks and assess the ability of neuronal populations to maintain information over time. The results showed that acute stress can enhance working memory information retention by enhancing AMPA and NMDA synaptic currents. In contrast, chronic stress reduces dendritic spine density and weakens the regulatory effect of GABA currents on working memory tasks. In addition, this structural damage can be complemented by strong connections between excitatory neurons with the same selectivity. These findings provide a reference scheme for understanding the neural basis of working memory under different stress conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12432,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1534839"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2025.1534839","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute stress results from sudden short-term events, and individuals need to quickly adjust their physiological and psychological to re-establish balance. Chronic stress, on the other hand, results in long-term physiological and psychological burdens due to the continued existence of stressors, making it difficult for individuals to recover and prone to pathological symptoms. Both types of stress can affect working memory and change cognitive function. In this study, we explored the impact of acute and chronic stress on synaptic modulation using a biologically inspired, data-driven rodent prefrontal neural network model. The model consists of a specific number of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that are connected through AMPA, NMDA, and GABA synapses. The study used a short-term recall to simulate working memory tasks and assess the ability of neuronal populations to maintain information over time. The results showed that acute stress can enhance working memory information retention by enhancing AMPA and NMDA synaptic currents. In contrast, chronic stress reduces dendritic spine density and weakens the regulatory effect of GABA currents on working memory tasks. In addition, this structural damage can be complemented by strong connections between excitatory neurons with the same selectivity. These findings provide a reference scheme for understanding the neural basis of working memory under different stress conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突触调节不同类型的压力对工作记忆的影响:一项大脑激发的尖峰神经网络研究。
急性应激源于突发的短期事件,个体需要迅速调整自己的生理和心理以重新建立平衡。而慢性应激则是由于应激源的持续存在,使个体产生长期的生理和心理负担,难以恢复,容易出现病理性症状。这两种压力都会影响工作记忆,改变认知功能。在这项研究中,我们利用生物学启发、数据驱动的啮齿动物前额叶神经网络模型探索了急性和慢性应激对突触调节的影响。该模型由特定数量的兴奋性和抑制性神经元组成,这些神经元通过AMPA、NMDA和GABA突触连接。该研究使用短期回忆来模拟工作记忆任务,并评估神经元群随时间保持信息的能力。结果表明,急性应激可通过增强AMPA和NMDA突触电流增强工作记忆信息保留。相反,慢性应激降低树突棘密度,减弱GABA电流对工作记忆任务的调节作用。此外,这种结构损伤可以通过具有相同选择性的兴奋性神经元之间的强连接来补充。这些发现为理解不同应激条件下工作记忆的神经基础提供了参考方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
627
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the cellular mechanisms underlying cell function in the nervous system across all species. Specialty Chief Editors Egidio D‘Angelo at the University of Pavia and Christian Hansel at the University of Chicago are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
From mice to clinical relevance: humanizing neuroscience with human-based model systems. Correction: Histone deacetylase inhibitors are protective in acute but not in chronic models of ototoxicity. Contribution of proprioceptors in the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus and their surrounding astrocytes to acidic saline-induced chronic jaw muscle pain in rodents. Utilizing a culture system for horizontal cells to study neural circuit assembly in the developing mouse retina. "Mind the Gap"-enlarged perivascular spaces as a potential magnetic resonance imaging biomarker of impaired glymphatic clearance in brain disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1